Having had interactions with the criminal justice system as a defendant.
by dudeloony November 1, 2020
Get the justice-involvedmug. by Niknast769 September 10, 2025
Get the Social Justicemug. Social justice is double speak for justifying socialism. The true meanings of words are hidden so well by the socialists that the casual observer has little reason to question them. So convinced of the meaning of social justice, social justice warriors will resort to the use of force in their quest for justice(?).
by 2B+ September 2, 2022
Get the social justicemug. Justice is a huge dickhead she will do anything for a friend or boyfriend. She likes to assume that people are talking about her and her has no friends! If you know a justice DO NOT be friends with her!!!! If you are friends with her all I’m going to say is good luck!
by Fhudhehfhdh March 13, 2019
Get the Justicemug. Kev bae don’t go out by yourself justice is there
Mari I won’t baby
Justice hey ma
Mari ahhhhh justiceeee
Mari I won’t baby
Justice hey ma
Mari ahhhhh justiceeee
by Sexydudenamejustice March 6, 2025
Get the Justicemug. In the adversarial system of UK law, England and Wales, an examining justice is a form of lay judge who presides over the Magistrates Court. They are highly trained and powerful individuals, hand picked by the Lord Justice of the United Kingdom who presides over both summary and either-way offences in the criminal courts as well as family, youth and civil courts.
They have powers of administering unlimited fines, penalties, custodial sentences of up to 12 months, court orders and other warrants such as §135 of the mental health act, or §1 of the Magistrates Court act at their own discretion, either internally or externally to the courtroom.
An examining magistrate will initiate a single justice procedure to sentence a serious offender instead of sitting in a panel. They blur the lines between district judges.
They have powers to authorise wiretaps, sentence at will, commit to the crown court and authorise private investigations. An examining magistrate may also prosecute at their private capacity.
They have powers of administering unlimited fines, penalties, custodial sentences of up to 12 months, court orders and other warrants such as §135 of the mental health act, or §1 of the Magistrates Court act at their own discretion, either internally or externally to the courtroom.
An examining magistrate will initiate a single justice procedure to sentence a serious offender instead of sitting in a panel. They blur the lines between district judges.
They have powers to authorise wiretaps, sentence at will, commit to the crown court and authorise private investigations. An examining magistrate may also prosecute at their private capacity.
by Lutonlegal February 17, 2025
Get the Examining Justicemug. Nassim’s Sword of Social Justice (aka D’Sousa’s Razor)
Identified by Nassim Nicholas Taleb in the Medium article: The Merchandising of Virtue" - May 27, 2017
"Kids with rich parents talk about “white privilege” at such privileged colleges as Amherst –but in one instance, one of them could not answer D’Souza’s simple and logical suggestion: ‘Why don’t you go to the registrar’s office and give your privileged spot to a minority student who was next in line?’
Hence the principle:
If your private life conflicts with your intellectual opinion, it cancels your intellectual ideas, not your private life.
and
If your private actions do not generalise then you cannot have general ideas.
This is not strictly about ethics, but information transfer. If a car salesman tries to sell you a Detroit car while driving a Honda, he is signalling that it may have a problem."
The video Taleb is referencing is:
SO SATISFYING: Dinesh D'Souza absolutely shreds SJW over "white privilege" - Young America's Foundation
Published 09 Jun 2018. Recorded at Amherst College.
If you hold an intellectual ideal, but your real world actions do not reflect or enforce this ideal. Then your actions cancel out this ideological stance. You cannot say to the words "I am a vegan" and claim the moral virtue for such an identity, but occasionally eat chicken. The act of eating the chicken cancels out any moral or ideological virtue or superiority claimed by being vegan.
Identified by Nassim Nicholas Taleb in the Medium article: The Merchandising of Virtue" - May 27, 2017
"Kids with rich parents talk about “white privilege” at such privileged colleges as Amherst –but in one instance, one of them could not answer D’Souza’s simple and logical suggestion: ‘Why don’t you go to the registrar’s office and give your privileged spot to a minority student who was next in line?’
Hence the principle:
If your private life conflicts with your intellectual opinion, it cancels your intellectual ideas, not your private life.
and
If your private actions do not generalise then you cannot have general ideas.
This is not strictly about ethics, but information transfer. If a car salesman tries to sell you a Detroit car while driving a Honda, he is signalling that it may have a problem."
The video Taleb is referencing is:
SO SATISFYING: Dinesh D'Souza absolutely shreds SJW over "white privilege" - Young America's Foundation
Published 09 Jun 2018. Recorded at Amherst College.
If you hold an intellectual ideal, but your real world actions do not reflect or enforce this ideal. Then your actions cancel out this ideological stance. You cannot say to the words "I am a vegan" and claim the moral virtue for such an identity, but occasionally eat chicken. The act of eating the chicken cancels out any moral or ideological virtue or superiority claimed by being vegan.
Student: "We have numbers that demonstrate precisely how much wealth was stolen, and that's money that in some way could be given back."
D'Sousa: "You're willing to have social justice with other people's pay, but you're not willing to pay.
So that's the problem. And that's the problem with the progressivism that marches behind social justice, while protecting its own privileges. You know, how you said, we all have to survive, really, you have to be at Amherst to survive?
You don't have to be at Amherst to survive, you have to be at Amherst to benefit.
You have to be at Amherst because you're getting opportunities at this college that many other people are not getting.
So if you say you believe in equal opportunity, you're a hypocrite because you are taking advantage of opportunities unavailable to others. But for you this hypocrisy is fully justified because you are militating on behalf of the poor. But if it's if you're against privilege - this college is privilege. So there's a glaring hypocrisy, and you will never turn your moral mirror on yourself to say, What am I doing about it?
That's my point. For you - society should act before you do - to enforce your moral code.”
____________
Person A: “I’m a vegan but I occasionally have some chicken.”
Person B: “By the logic of Nassim's Sword of Social Justice - the act of eating the chicken cancels out your vegan claim, regardless of what you say about yourself.”
D'Sousa: "You're willing to have social justice with other people's pay, but you're not willing to pay.
So that's the problem. And that's the problem with the progressivism that marches behind social justice, while protecting its own privileges. You know, how you said, we all have to survive, really, you have to be at Amherst to survive?
You don't have to be at Amherst to survive, you have to be at Amherst to benefit.
You have to be at Amherst because you're getting opportunities at this college that many other people are not getting.
So if you say you believe in equal opportunity, you're a hypocrite because you are taking advantage of opportunities unavailable to others. But for you this hypocrisy is fully justified because you are militating on behalf of the poor. But if it's if you're against privilege - this college is privilege. So there's a glaring hypocrisy, and you will never turn your moral mirror on yourself to say, What am I doing about it?
That's my point. For you - society should act before you do - to enforce your moral code.”
____________
Person A: “I’m a vegan but I occasionally have some chicken.”
Person B: “By the logic of Nassim's Sword of Social Justice - the act of eating the chicken cancels out your vegan claim, regardless of what you say about yourself.”
by bewdew December 9, 2023
Get the Nassim's Sword of Social Justicemug.