The best president the United States has ever had. Was victim to countless attack by granola eating, birkenstock wearing, greatful dead listening hippy liberal douche bags. A TRUE AMERICAN. He is the shit.
by Iraq War Vet November 14, 2008
by Joseph Dean May 4, 2006
The 43rd president of the United States of America, and despite a very negative approval rating, is a good man and a great president. George Bush handled, within months of his inauguraion, the most terrible terrorist attack on the U.S. ever, and at the time his handling of this tragedy gave him the highest approval rate of any president. And since then no terrorists have been successful on U.S. soil.
He successfully ivaded Iraq and took Saddam Hussein out of power. Anyone who says the war is bad is ignorant, for they believe only the media, who only looks for the bad things about the war, and the Democrats, cause Bush isn't one. He graduated Yale, he cant be dumb then, bet you couldn't, and I et if any one of you had to talk to the country, you speaking would be ten times worse than his. And for the haters out there, if Al Gore was president, there'd be attacks by the day... but there would be less pollution, so we'd all be dead, but the earth is spic and span...right. And Kerry wouldn't have been able to decide anything.
He successfully ivaded Iraq and took Saddam Hussein out of power. Anyone who says the war is bad is ignorant, for they believe only the media, who only looks for the bad things about the war, and the Democrats, cause Bush isn't one. He graduated Yale, he cant be dumb then, bet you couldn't, and I et if any one of you had to talk to the country, you speaking would be ten times worse than his. And for the haters out there, if Al Gore was president, there'd be attacks by the day... but there would be less pollution, so we'd all be dead, but the earth is spic and span...right. And Kerry wouldn't have been able to decide anything.
by Jay Liarge July 16, 2007
The man and former President of the United States whose election in 2000 saved the country from a terrible evil known as "Al Gore" and again saved the country 4 years later from another evil similar to the first, this time called "John Kerry". Unfortunately people frequently fail to recognize what would've happened under the direction of any of the alternatives.
"I'm so glad George W. Bush was elected and not Al Gore or John Kerry"
"Yeah, for sure, crisis averted!"
"Yeah, for sure, crisis averted!"
by megaman.exe October 23, 2012
The Smartest Man Alive! Simply the greatest human being anyone has ever known; a gentleman, and a scholar. George W. Bush is a shining example of sheer excellence and comes second to none in his outstanding presidential skills! A man to be envied...
Please, try not to laugh... Just show this to your friends...
Please, try not to laugh... Just show this to your friends...
I wish I was as smart as George W. Bush.
George W. Bush is amazing.
I will never be as smart as George W. Bush!
Can we elect George W. Bush for the next 100 years?!
George W. Bush is amazing.
I will never be as smart as George W. Bush!
Can we elect George W. Bush for the next 100 years?!
by SarcasticPlastic July 11, 2008
George W. Bush may not be the best U.S. President, but he has done a very good job with the tough situations that he has been faced with. In the beginning of his first term as President, Bush was faced with the terrorist attacks on September 11th, 2001. This was the most deadly surprise attack on U.S. soil in U.S. history. No other President has faced such a devastating act of terrorism. After 9/11, George W. Bush initiated an operation which successfully overthrew the Taliban (a terrorist oraganization ruling Afghanistan). Later, Bush decided to go to war with Iraq and the ruthless tyrant Saddam Hussein. Hussein was known to have committed genocide on his own people because of their cultural background. A common misconception is that the Iraq War is based on oil. This is a hollow lie however. The war is a war on terrorism. The Iraq War is being fought to protect our great country and our way of life as well as other freedom-loving democracies throughout the world. Leaders like Saddam Hussein and the terrorist organizations seeking refuge in Iraq are a threat to our freedom and our way of life. Another misconception is that the troops in Iraq are suffering massive casualties and do not want to be there. The main reason for people believing this is because of the negative coverage of the war by the vastly liberal media. These media outlets never cover the stories of triumph and accomplishment by our troops.... we only hear about the deaths and injuries. The fact is though, that the war in Iraq has had the least amount of casualties of any major war in U.S. history. If you stop listening to the news anchors and listen to someone who is currently over in Iraq you will hear a completely different story. The troops in Iraq want to be there because they know how important the war on terrorism is in protecting our country and our future. They are proud to serve their country, and it only hurts them when they see the media at home portraying their job in such a pessimistic manor.
George W. Bush may not be a perfect President, but he is a great leader. The U.S. is much safer now than it was before George W. Bush was elected President.
Being a good U.S. citizen, I ask everyone who reads this to support our troops in Iraq. You do not have to agree with all of these opinions, but in a time of war strong countries stick together, they do not fight amongst themselves. Or in the words of Abraham Lincoln "A house divided against itself cannot stand".
George W. Bush may not be a perfect President, but he is a great leader. The U.S. is much safer now than it was before George W. Bush was elected President.
Being a good U.S. citizen, I ask everyone who reads this to support our troops in Iraq. You do not have to agree with all of these opinions, but in a time of war strong countries stick together, they do not fight amongst themselves. Or in the words of Abraham Lincoln "A house divided against itself cannot stand".
by rhyno_OSU July 7, 2006
Since Bush, Sr., every U.S. President has vowed to get rid of Saddam. Why, then did it take us so long to actually get the task accomplished? Well the answer actually lies in several factors. First of all Saddam continued to make threats which were never taken seriously until after 9/11. Until then it was belived that Saddam was a threat, but because there had never really been any devastating occurences Saddam was not at the top of the priority list of any president other than Bush, Jr.. Once 9/11 happened, however, every threat that was recieved was immediately taken seriously, including those that were made by Saddam. Therefore if any other president had been in office when 9/11 happened then it would have been he who eventually took out Saddam, not Bush, Jr.
despite a deteriorating budget circumstance, the president and congressional republicans have actively worked this year t make things worse and further widen future deficts. The centerpiece of this year's deficit was the president's proposal for a new round of tax cuts that, like the 2001 tax cuts, provided some relief for middle class families but targeted the bulk of the benifits to the wealthiest taxpayers.
by Scarry Pothead December 28, 2005