Forrealla

Real as hell.

Friend 1: "We should go put the boat in, fish, and drink some beer."
Friend 2: "Forrealla."

by YourPalDrewdle March 31, 2024

Formal Chomp

A femboy British person who likes boykissers, usually identifies as a furry, loves being trans and has a obsession with the lgbtq community. If you ever call anyone this they are probably the worst person in existence, for more, search up the phrase "TVWoman X Formal Chomp

That guy is so annoying, such a Formal Chomp

by johnlebiden May 3, 2024

formal title

If you have a formal title you're probably a very formal person who works hard to get anything

Damn look how formal that guy is he must have a formal title

by gyatt gobbler May 15, 2024

floréal

floréal is a cute french boy. he is the sweetest, the smartest and kindest person ever. he likes russia, stocks and gold.
floréal looks like a greek god with his muscular figure and gorgeous curly hair. his mesmerizing eyes will stuck in your brain for days.

OMG, floréal just sent me another cute message!! he is sooo adorable ^^

by miss_hell June 28, 2024

Formal slut

A girl or boy ( usually a chick) that goes to lots of formals for male validation. Either they have lots of male friends or they just want the attention.

Jack - “Holy fuck that Sarah chick is a formal slut she’s been to 4 this year”

John - “ yeh bro she’s done them all too”

by Soz x July 3, 2024

Formal Meta-Fallacies

Meta-errors related to the realm of formal logic and deductive reasoning. This involves incorrectly asserting that an argument's formal structure is invalid when it is valid, or valid when it is invalid. It can also include the mistake of treating a formally valid but utterly unrealistic syllogism as a serious argument, or dismissing a formally invalid argument whose conclusion nonetheless happens to be true based on other evidence. It's pedantry or confusion at the level of logical syntax.

Formal Meta-Fallacies Example: Someone presents a logically valid deductive argument: "All cats are reptiles. Fluffy is a cat. Therefore, Fluffy is a reptile." A critic, missing the point about the false premise, attacks it by saying, "That's affirming the consequent!" This is a Formal Meta-Fallacy—they've incorrectly identified the formal structure. The argument is actually valid but unsound due to the false first premise.

by Dumu The Void February 4, 2026

Formal Philosophy

The branch of philosophy that applies the tools of formal logic and mathematics to traditional philosophical questions, producing arguments that are either airtight or reveal that the question was nonsense to begin with. Formal philosophers ask not just "what is truth?" but "what are the logical conditions under which a statement can be considered true?" and then write 200 pages of symbols that answer the question so precisely that no one can understand the answer. It's philosophy for people who found regular philosophy too vague and decided to fix that by making it incomprehensible.

Example: "He read a paper in formal philosophy that used modal logic to prove that God either exists necessarily or cannot exist at all. He understood the symbols, followed the proof, and concluded that the argument was logically valid. He then realized he had no idea whether God actually existed, which was where he'd started, but now with more symbols."

by Abzugal February 14, 2026