by MarkMorava October 03, 2016
by Big Ben Whrit January 18, 2018
Psoriasis. It's a skin disease that is definitely no fun. Your arms tend to like somewhat similar to salami.
by DerekMoMerek February 01, 2008
A tattoo that sucks.
by goddamn3000 March 14, 2023
A phrase describing the direct correlation between the number / eccentricity of attractive tattoos and the emotional instability and un-datability of a hot person.
by WordOfTheDay83 January 19, 2023
a popular, yet highly condemned, body aesthetic personal choice, which people use to show off, express their creativity, deal with traumatic events, or fix temporary whims and boredom.
basics: a needle goes into your skin repeatedly, to make a tear and get non-toxic (desired) ink inside. ideally, you do this tattoo thing once, then you move on to another patch of skin, unlike with botox (toxic) or other skin procedures (radio/high frequency, microneedling, peelings, etc.) that work on the basis of they destroy your skin and/or other cells and you need to use up some telomeres and eventually stem cells to heal yourself, procedures that you end up doing over and over in your life. yes, to look better, and yes, you heal, and yes, right now humans don't reach the maximum potential of their genetic lifespan anyway to feel a reduction, and miss those stem cells, so why not? better to focus on protecting your heart, and donating to research for cancer, and other bad things.
if done in truly sanitary conditions, tattoos are not that bad for the body, unless there's something off with the ink, or you choose to remove the tattoo, breaking the ink apart into small-small toxic particles that will then all get absorbed into the bloodstream. health hazard! good luck kidneys! and not only. so choose wisely. ideally you should not have it removed.
wouldn't it be nice instead to have this ink be nutrients for the body, so that you kinda get a vitamin boots when you wanna change things up?
basics: a needle goes into your skin repeatedly, to make a tear and get non-toxic (desired) ink inside. ideally, you do this tattoo thing once, then you move on to another patch of skin, unlike with botox (toxic) or other skin procedures (radio/high frequency, microneedling, peelings, etc.) that work on the basis of they destroy your skin and/or other cells and you need to use up some telomeres and eventually stem cells to heal yourself, procedures that you end up doing over and over in your life. yes, to look better, and yes, you heal, and yes, right now humans don't reach the maximum potential of their genetic lifespan anyway to feel a reduction, and miss those stem cells, so why not? better to focus on protecting your heart, and donating to research for cancer, and other bad things.
if done in truly sanitary conditions, tattoos are not that bad for the body, unless there's something off with the ink, or you choose to remove the tattoo, breaking the ink apart into small-small toxic particles that will then all get absorbed into the bloodstream. health hazard! good luck kidneys! and not only. so choose wisely. ideally you should not have it removed.
wouldn't it be nice instead to have this ink be nutrients for the body, so that you kinda get a vitamin boots when you wanna change things up?
naysayer: tattoos are bad, but i use a derma roller to keep my skin looking young and fresh.
Doug: i smell a bit of a hypocrite here.
Doug: i smell a bit of a hypocrite here.
by wokeup2this July 10, 2022
Tattoos might have indicated a person's toughness in the past, but those days are long gone. Nowadays, so many people get tattoos that they don't indicate anything. Pussies get tattoos like many other people do these days. You got people nowadays who get tattoos just to look tough or to look like somebody they know, or to look like a bunch of other people with the same tattoo.
He/she got a tattoo(s) to try and get more respect than they did as a kid, back when he/she was a fuckin dork.
by Solid Mantis September 12, 2019