A phrase describing the direct correlation between the number / eccentricity of attractive tattoos and the emotional instability and un-datability of a hot person.
by WordOfTheDay83 January 20, 2023
M- dot tattoo is a tattoo competitors choose to get if they want, after they have completed an iron man triathlon in Hawaii. if you get it before you complete the 1500 entry race your a poser
by uriospaniard November 06, 2010
a tattoo that is self-referential, introspective and is a comment on the very nature of a tattoo itself, in a way also becoming existentialist. inspired by a meta joke.
a tattoo that says "skin deep" could be a meta tattoo because the tattoo references itself by being literally skin deep. while to somebody else, it could be a reminder to have a thick skin and not take things to heart.
by Mr_MortalGod January 03, 2024
It is the WORST mobile broadband USB stick. It even illegally used Tonino Lamborghini's name to advertise this piece of sh*t. It's advertisements are deceptive. Don't use it, otherwise you'll regret it!
Guy 1: Awww! My Internet is slow again...
Guy 2: Dude! Are you using Globe Tattoo?!
Guy 1: Yeah...
Guy 2: Then throw that piece of trash and get a REAL broadband!
Guy 2: Dude! Are you using Globe Tattoo?!
Guy 1: Yeah...
Guy 2: Then throw that piece of trash and get a REAL broadband!
by THE_IDENTIFIER December 03, 2011
When you offer to show someone the "lion tattoo" you pull your pants down, bend over, and show them your butthole.
Me- Hey broseph, have can I show you my Lion tattoo?
Broseph- Heck yeah man! Show me!
Me- *pulls down pants*
Broseph- Aww gross, man!!!
Broseph- Heck yeah man! Show me!
Me- *pulls down pants*
Broseph- Aww gross, man!!!
by Southern Chef January 19, 2012
A tattoo that looks amateurish, is poor quality, or appears to have been received while in prison and is commonly seen on white trash.
by Blaksnot Thundercheeks September 18, 2015
a popular, yet highly condemned, body aesthetic personal choice, which people use to show off, express their creativity, deal with traumatic events, or fix temporary whims and boredom.
basics: a needle goes into your skin repeatedly, to make a tear and get non-toxic (desired) ink inside. ideally, you do this tattoo thing once, then you move on to another patch of skin, unlike with botox (toxic) or other skin procedures (radio/high frequency, microneedling, peelings, etc.) that work on the basis of they destroy your skin and/or other cells and you need to use up some telomeres and eventually stem cells to heal yourself, procedures that you end up doing over and over in your life. yes, to look better, and yes, you heal, and yes, right now humans don't reach the maximum potential of their genetic lifespan anyway to feel a reduction, and miss those stem cells, so why not? better to focus on protecting your heart, and donating to research for cancer, and other bad things.
if done in truly sanitary conditions, tattoos are not that bad for the body, unless there's something off with the ink, or you choose to remove the tattoo, breaking the ink apart into small-small toxic particles that will then all get absorbed into the bloodstream. health hazard! good luck kidneys! and not only. so choose wisely. ideally you should not have it removed.
wouldn't it be nice instead to have this ink be nutrients for the body, so that you kinda get a vitamin boots when you wanna change things up?
basics: a needle goes into your skin repeatedly, to make a tear and get non-toxic (desired) ink inside. ideally, you do this tattoo thing once, then you move on to another patch of skin, unlike with botox (toxic) or other skin procedures (radio/high frequency, microneedling, peelings, etc.) that work on the basis of they destroy your skin and/or other cells and you need to use up some telomeres and eventually stem cells to heal yourself, procedures that you end up doing over and over in your life. yes, to look better, and yes, you heal, and yes, right now humans don't reach the maximum potential of their genetic lifespan anyway to feel a reduction, and miss those stem cells, so why not? better to focus on protecting your heart, and donating to research for cancer, and other bad things.
if done in truly sanitary conditions, tattoos are not that bad for the body, unless there's something off with the ink, or you choose to remove the tattoo, breaking the ink apart into small-small toxic particles that will then all get absorbed into the bloodstream. health hazard! good luck kidneys! and not only. so choose wisely. ideally you should not have it removed.
wouldn't it be nice instead to have this ink be nutrients for the body, so that you kinda get a vitamin boots when you wanna change things up?
naysayer: tattoos are bad, but i use a derma roller to keep my skin looking young and fresh.
Doug: i smell a bit of a hypocrite here.
Doug: i smell a bit of a hypocrite here.
by wokeup2this July 10, 2022