Electoral Bias

The systematic distortion in an electoral system where certain groups, geographies, or ideologies are structurally over- or under-represented due to rules like gerrymandering, first-past-the-post voting, the electoral college, or voter ID laws. It's not about random error, but about engineered advantage. The bias is baked into the map, the ballot, and the rules of counting, ensuring that the translation of votes into power is never a clean, neutral process.

Example: In a country where rural votes are weighted more heavily than urban votes, a party can win a majority of parliamentary seats with a minority of the total national popular vote. This isn't an accident; it's the result of Electoral Bias designed into the system's constitution to privilege one demographic over another.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026

Political Biases

The full spectrum of unconscious and conscious prejudices that shape how individuals and groups perceive political information, actors, and policies. This includes partisan bias (favoring your party), ideological bias (filtering facts through a left/right lens), outgroup bias (distrusting the opposing side), and politician bias (assuming all politicians are corrupt). These biases ensure we are not rational political actors, but tribal, emotional ones.

Political Biases Example: A voter dismisses a glowing jobs report because it was released by an administration from the opposing party, accusing them of "cooking the books." The same voter would hail an identical report from their own party as proof of economic genius. This is raw Political Bias in action—the same fact is judged not on its merit, but on its source.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026

Reality Bias

The arrogant epistemological stance that one's own perception or model of the world is an unmediated, objective grasp of "reality," and that anyone who disagrees is either stupid, insane, or evil. It denies the interpretive, constructed, and theory-laden nature of all human understanding. In arguments, it manifests as the definitive declaration, "That's just the way it is," shutting down dialogue about differing experiences or interpretations.

Example: A wealthy CEO states, "If you're poor, it's because you didn't work hard. That's reality." This Reality Bias frames a specific, ideologically loaded belief about meritocracy as an incontrovertible law of nature, dismissing systemic barriers, luck, and inequality as irrelevant fantasies.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026

Biases of Wiki

The systematic editorial skews inherent to Wikipedia and similar wikis, stemming not from malicious intent but from the inherent characteristics of its volunteer base and collaborative process. Key biases include: systemic bias (over-representation of topics popular among young, tech-savvy, English-speaking Western males), citation bias (over-reliance on sources that are digital and in English), conflict-of-interest bias (covert editing by PR firms and political operatives), and consensus bias (controversial truths that challenge established narratives are often edited out in favor of bland, "settled" accounts that won't provoke edit wars). Wikipedia's biases are the map of the world, drawn by a specific, non-representative cartographers' guild.

Example: The Wikipedia article for a major video game franchise is detailed, meticulously sourced, and updated hourly. The article for a crucial Indigenous agricultural technique, equally significant to human culture, is a stub or non-existent. This reflects the Biases of Wiki: the contributor base writes passionately about its hobbies, while crucial indigenous knowledge languishes due to a lack of editors from that community.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026

Cognitive Biases of Encyclopedia

The subconscious prejudices of the individual experts, editors, and fact-checkers who compile traditional encyclopedias. These include professional domain bias (a historian might over-emphasize political history over social history), cultural blind spots, and unconscious allegiance to disciplinary paradigms. These personal biases are harder to spot and challenge than on a wiki, as they are buried under the veneer of singular, anonymous authority.

Cognitive Biases of Encyclopedia Example: The editor overseeing the "Psychology" section of an encyclopedia, trained in strict behaviorism, minimizes the contributions of psychoanalysis or humanistic psychology, framing them as historical curiosities. This Cognitive Bias of Encyclopedia shapes the reader's entire understanding of the field, presenting one school of thought as the definitive narrative.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026

NPOV Bias

The specific skew introduced by Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy when applied rigidly or naively. This bias manifests as false balance (giving equal weight to fringe and mainstream views, e.g., climate science vs. denialism), neutering of moral judgment (describing atrocities in the passive voice of "alleged" or "reported" events), and centrism bias (framing the midpoint between two partisan positions as inherently "neutral," even if one position is evidence-based and the other is not). NPOV can become a bias for the bland, the established, and the non-committal.

Example: A Wikipedia article on a tobacco company describes its history of marketing to children as "actions which have been criticized by public health advocates," while also noting the company's "contributions to economic growth." This NPOV Bias uses balanced language to obscure a moral reality, laundering reprehensible acts through the rhetoric of neutrality.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026

NPOV Cognitive Bias

The mental error committed by Wikipedia editors who believe that by stripping language of overt emotion and attributing all claims, they have achieved personal objectivity. It is the cognitive bias of believing you have no bias because you are following the NPOV rulebook. This blinds editors to their own ideological assumptions about what constitutes a "reliable source" or a "significant" viewpoint worthy of inclusion.

Example: An editor meticulously ensures every statement about socialism is attributed to a critic or a proponent, believing this makes the article neutral. However, their NPOV Cognitive Bias prevents them from seeing that their selection of which critiques and which defenses to include is itself driven by their own liberal-capitalist worldview, shaping the narrative within a frame they mistake for a blank slate.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026