"Hey man, wanna hit the club tonight?"
"Sure, is tom coming?"
"yeah why?"
"I've been trying to avoid him, he's my bro in law"
"aw that sucks"
"Sure, is tom coming?"
"yeah why?"
"I've been trying to avoid him, he's my bro in law"
"aw that sucks"
by Lemon Addict July 29, 2017
The application of scrutiny towards any statement which claims to know a general or specific consensus without citing polls or metadata. Identification of an appeal to vapid congruence.
Don’t know the specifics of the case, but the general consensus seems to be that the internet mob overplayed their hand.
Consensus of who? Perhaps it's time for the Law of the Nameless. The thing is, this is playing out in a United States court.
Consensus of who? Perhaps it's time for the Law of the Nameless. The thing is, this is playing out in a United States court.
by ØMVЯ November 11, 2021
An idea similar in concept to Murphy’s Law which states “Anything that can be taken out of context, will be taken out of context”
Guy #1: “I love Dick (1999)”
Guy #2: “lmao you love Dick”
Guy #1: “I do, but I am also now a victim of Done’s Law
Guy #2: “lmao you love Dick”
Guy #1: “I do, but I am also now a victim of Done’s Law
by Soulja Boy MD May 24, 2024
(epigraph) AKA “Holden’s Law” is when bad timing, a lack of patience, or a combination of the two result in a conflict of which dealer to buy from.
The most common example of William Holden’s Law is When your regular guy hasn’t gotten back to you in like, an hour, so you text your other guy you reach out to only when your regular is out of town, and you know his stuffs not as good, but your desperate as fuck so you say “sure”.
They respond instantly and say “come on through”, but as soon as your on the way out the door, your regular homie says “I’ll be home in 5, come on by”.
They respond instantly and say “come on through”, but as soon as your on the way out the door, your regular homie says “I’ll be home in 5, come on by”.
by PootMcToots October 16, 2021
Similar to Godwin's Law, as an online discussion grows longer, the probability of the discussion descending into ad hominem attacks and nonsense fuelled by apparent hatred or dislike of someone's comment approaches .
That is, if an online discussion (regardless of topic or scope) goes on long enough, sooner or later someone will begin making insults or start yelling about Hillary Clinton/Trump/Russia/shills or similar in order to distract and lead to forum-slide.
Coined on reddit in 2018 and named after a reddit user with the same name, Cencorme's Law originally referred specifically to subreddit discussions. It is now applied to any threaded online discussion, such as Internet forums, chat rooms, and comment threads, as well as to speeches, articles, and other rhetoric occurs.
When such an event occurs, the person guilty of invoking Cencorme's Law has effectively forfeited the argument.
That is, if an online discussion (regardless of topic or scope) goes on long enough, sooner or later someone will begin making insults or start yelling about Hillary Clinton/Trump/Russia/shills or similar in order to distract and lead to forum-slide.
Coined on reddit in 2018 and named after a reddit user with the same name, Cencorme's Law originally referred specifically to subreddit discussions. It is now applied to any threaded online discussion, such as Internet forums, chat rooms, and comment threads, as well as to speeches, articles, and other rhetoric occurs.
When such an event occurs, the person guilty of invoking Cencorme's Law has effectively forfeited the argument.
redditor a: "I really disliked EA's latest game release"
redditor b: "Blame the Trump and Russians for that. They worked together to influence the developers..."
redditor a: "Classic case of Cencorme's Law"
redditor b: "Blame the Trump and Russians for that. They worked together to influence the developers..."
redditor a: "Classic case of Cencorme's Law"
by GrimPeeper April 03, 2018
As a discussion gets longer, the probability of a jew mentioning the ww2, hitler, or the holocaust in an arguement increases.
Guy: The fuck? You trying to swindle me?
Jew: OY VEY ANTISEMITE! THIS IS JUST LIKE THE HOLOCAUST WHEN 6000 ULTRILLION JEWS DIED.
Guy: Shut the fuck up dude, just give me my money back.
Guy 2: Just another case of Jews Law good sir.
Jew: OY VEY ANTISEMITE! THIS IS JUST LIKE THE HOLOCAUST WHEN 6000 ULTRILLION JEWS DIED.
Guy: Shut the fuck up dude, just give me my money back.
Guy 2: Just another case of Jews Law good sir.
My child-in-law is a good person.
by Rwopazaq November 24, 2019