Skip to main content

Graham's Million 

An number thats graham's number to the power of 1 million.
Person 1: Whats your favourite number?

Person 2: Graham's Million.

Rats-A-Million 

A phrase for when things don't go your way
Alissa: oh no the house is on fire!

Jaycub: RATS-A-MILLION
Rats-A-Million by Jacobo47 April 5, 2025

100-200 million dollars

"I bet you 100 million- No, 200 million dollars that THAT nigga... Does. Not. Create AI" ~ Jay Z
Hym "Hehehahahahahaha! Pay up! 100-200 million dollars. I bet you a billion dollars to a bucket of dogshit that THAT is what that lawsuit is about."

pancreas nide 89,2 million

Mustard Mango 67 but my version. Pancreas because I'm a Garten of Banban fan, Nide because you can say it after saying "cya" in a game to make "cyanide" (a heavy poison) and 89,2 million (stands for 89212032) which is a referance to the Roblox game "gondola ride into 89212032 ounces of nuclear waste". Can use it to annoy people. If they don't know what it means, just tell them to go on Urban Dictionary and look it up.
me: "pancreas nide 89,2 million!"
best friend: "I will send a raytheon intercontinental ballistic missile to your exact home address"

Fallacy of Absolute Deprivation (also "Communism Killed Millions" Fallacy)

A form of fallacy that cites the absolute number of deaths attributed to communist regimes—typically the Soviet Union, China, or Cambodia—as an argument against any form of socialism or communist thought, while ignoring context, comparative analysis, or the question of what those numbers actually mean. The fallacy works by presenting large numbers as self-evident condemnation, as if the scale alone settled the matter. It ignores that all modern states have killed millions—colonialism, capitalism, imperialism, democracy—and that the question is not whether atrocities occurred but what caused them, whether they were inherent to the system or contingent, and what the alternatives were. The Fallacy of Absolute Deprivation is beloved of cold warriors and those who prefer moral simplicity to historical complexity. It reduces genocide to a statistic and uses that statistic to foreclose thought.
Fallacy of Absolute Deprivation (also "Communism Killed Millions" Fallacy) Example: "He ended every discussion of socialism with the same numbers: 'Stalin killed millions. Mao killed millions. Pol Pot killed millions.' The Fallacy of Absolute Deprivation meant he never had to engage with arguments about healthcare, wages, or working conditions. The numbers did all his work for him—never mind context, never mind comparison, never mind that capitalism had killed its millions too. Absolute numbers, absolutely weaponized."

Fallacy of Isolated Deprivation (also "Communism Killed Millions" Fallacy)

A fallacy that isolates the deaths attributed to communist regimes from their historical context, treating them as if they occurred in a vacuum rather than amid civil war, foreign intervention, industrialization, and the collapse of old orders. The fallacy presents communist atrocities as sui generis, uniquely evil, while ignoring that comparable or greater suffering occurred under colonialism, imperialism, and capitalism—often at the same times, in the same places, by the same actors. Isolating deprivation allows the fallacy-user to condemn one system while absolving others, to treat communism as uniquely murderous while forgetting the millions killed by Western powers. It's history as selective memory, atrocity as political weapon.
Fallacy of Isolated Deprivation (also "Communism Killed Millions" Fallacy) Example: "He listed the deaths under Mao without mentioning that they occurred during a brutal civil war, after decades of foreign occupation, amid the most rapid industrialization in history. The Fallacy of Isolated Deprivation had stripped away all context, leaving only numbers—numbers that could be used to condemn, never to understand. His listeners were left with horror without history, which is exactly what he wanted."