Fallacy of Objective Reality

The fallacy of assuming that one's own perception of reality is simply "objective reality," and that anyone who disagrees is either mistaken, deluded, or lying. This fallacy collapses the distinction between appearance and reality, treating one's own perspective as the perspective. It's the epistemological version of the objectivity bias: not just believing you're right, but believing that rightness is not a matter of perspective at all—that you have direct access to the way things really are. The Fallacy of Objective Reality is beloved of those who have never encountered a worldview different from their own, or who have encountered it and found it threatening. It makes dialogue impossible because disagreement becomes not difference but error, not alternative but falsehood.

Example: "He didn't think his political views were views—they were just 'reality.' When she presented a different perspective, he didn't engage; he explained why she was wrong to see what she saw. The Fallacy of Objective Reality meant that her experience, her evidence, her reasoning—all were invalid because they didn't match his 'reality.' She gave up arguing; he declared victory."

by Dumu The Void February 20, 2026

Bias of Arbitrary Objectivity

A bias where an individual declares their own perspective to be objective while dismissing all others as biased—without any justification for why their perspective deserves the "objective" label. The bias is arbitrary because the criteria for objectivity shift to always favor the biased party: what's "objective" is whatever they believe, whatever their side says, whatever serves their interests. This bias is the foundation of punditry, of editorializing, of the confident assertion that "I'm not political, I just believe in common sense" (where common sense means my opinions). The Bias of Arbitrary Objectivity allows its holder to feel rational while being utterly unreflective, to claim neutrality while being deeply partisan. It's the bias that denies it's a bias, which is what makes it so effective and so dangerous.

Example: "He introduced himself as 'just giving the facts, no bias.' Then he spent an hour presenting one side of every issue, dismissing opposing views as 'ideological.' The Bias of Arbitrary Objectivity meant he never had to examine his own assumptions—they weren't assumptions, they were just 'reality.' When challenged, he didn't defend his views; he defended his right to be the arbiter of what counts as objective. The bias was invisible to him, which is how it worked."

by Dumu The Void February 20, 2026

Evidence Objectivity Bias

A variation of objectivity bias where something only counts as evidence if the person making the judgment says it's evidence. "That's not evidence because I say so." The bias replaces objective standards of evidence with personal fiat, making the individual the sole arbiter of what counts as proof. Evidence Objectivity Bias is what allows conspiracy theorists to dismiss mountains of data while accepting a single tweet as proof. It's what allows bad-faith arguers to demand evidence, then reject it, then demand different evidence, then reject that—because the real standard is not evidence but agreement. If you agree with me, your evidence counts; if you don't, it doesn't. The bias is the "because I said so" of epistemology, the final refuge of those who have no arguments left.

Example: "She provided study after study showing vaccine safety. He dismissed each one with Evidence Objectivity Bias: 'That's not real evidence.' When she asked what would count, he said 'I'll know it when I see it.' He never saw it. The bias had made him the sole judge of what counts as proof—and his judgment was that nothing that disagreed with him could ever count. Evidence wasn't the issue; control was."

by Dumu The Void February 20, 2026

Logical Objectivity Bias

A variation of objectivity bias where something only counts as logical if the person making the judgment says it's logical. "That's not logical because I say so." The bias replaces logical standards with personal authority, making the individual the arbiter of reason itself. Logical Objectivity Bias is what allows people to reject valid arguments as "illogical" while accepting obvious fallacies from their own side. It's what makes debate impossible because the standards shift constantly—what's logical is whatever supports my position; what's illogical is whatever challenges it. The bias is the ultimate expression of epistemic narcissism: not just believing you're right, but believing you're the definition of rightness.

Example: "He presented a perfectly valid syllogism. She responded with Logical Objectivity Bias: 'That's not logical.' No explanation, no reasoning—just declaration. When he asked what made it illogical, she said 'It just is.' The bias had made her the sole judge of logic, and her judgment was that anything she disagreed with was automatically unreasonable. Reason wasn't the issue; authority was."

by Dumu The Void February 20, 2026

Objective Truth Bias

A variation of truth bias where one assumes that their truth is not just true but objectively true—true independent of any perspective, any context, any observer. Objective Truth Bias is the belief that one has access to the view from nowhere, the God's-eye perspective, the way things really are. It's the bias of those who think they're not biased, who think their judgments are pure reflections of reality. Objective Truth Bias is the favorite bias of scientists who forget they're human, of philosophers who think they've escaped history, of everyone who has ever said "just the facts" as if facts weren't interpreted.

Example: "He presented his analysis as 'just the objective truth.' Objective Truth Bias meant he never had to examine his assumptions, his context, his perspective. His truth wasn't a truth; it was the truth. When she pointed out that other reasonable people saw things differently, he dismissed them as biased. The irony was invisible to him, which is how it worked."

by Abzugal February 21, 2026

Objective Factuality Bias

The bias where one assumes that their facts are not just factual but objectively factual—true from any perspective, in any context, for any observer. Objective Factuality Bias is factuality bias combined with objectivity bias: the belief that one's facts are not just selected and framed but are simply the way things are. It's the bias of those who think their news source is "just the news," their data is "just the data," their evidence is "just the evidence"—while everyone else's is biased. Objective Factuality Bias is the favorite bias of pundits, of propagandists, of everyone who has ever presented a partisan view as simple reality.

Example: "His news source was 'objective'; everyone else's was 'biased.' Objective Factuality Bias meant he never had to question his own sources, his own framing, his own selections. His facts were just facts; others' facts were propaganda. The double standard was invisible to him, which is how it maintained his certainty."

by Abzugal February 21, 2026

Objectivity Perspectivism

The application of perspectivism to objectivity—the view that objectivity is not achieved by escaping perspective but by multiplying perspectives, by seeing from many angles, by incorporating multiple standpoints. Objectivity Perspectivism argues that the traditional ideal of objectivity—the view from nowhere—is not only impossible but undesirable. Real objectivity comes from acknowledging your perspective, understanding its limits, and seeking out other perspectives to correct and enrich your own. Objectivity Perspectivism is the philosophy of strong objectivity, of situated knowledge, of the recognition that the best truth is the one that has been seen from the most angles.

Example: "She used to think objectivity meant having no perspective. Objectivity Perspectivism showed her otherwise: objectivity meant having many perspectives, holding them together, letting them correct each other. Her view was partial; so was everyone's. The goal wasn't to escape partiality but to assemble as many partial views as possible into something richer. Objectivity wasn't absence; it was abundance."

by Abzugal February 21, 2026