Irish men get drunk and play with their junk

Irish men.

1: how is toby?

2: ah yk irish men get drunk and play with their junk!
1: ahh alr i got u

by NauticalOcean February 4, 2024

Irish men get drunk and play with their junk

Irish men.

1: how is toby?

2: ah yk irish men get drunk and play with their junk!
1: ahh alr i got u

by NauticalOcean February 4, 2024

slob kabob drunk

When an individual consumes enough alcohol that their natural resistance to slob on just anyone's kabob is diminished to the point of slobbing in some kabob by the end of the night, this happens most likely with a stranger they will never see again. Knowing names is optional.

I couldn't believe that Gwynn was at the company Christmas party slob kabob drunk, and she vanished with those twins from accounting with mustaches.

by The real W November 21, 2023

National Get Drunk Day

June 16th of every year is national get drunk day.

you better be drunk tonight it’s national get drunk day.

by holidayman25 June 13, 2024

Hard Problem of Debunking

The self-defeating irony that vigorously debunking a false or pseudoscientific claim can actually strengthen belief in it among its adherents. This happens through mechanisms like the backfire effect (where contradictory evidence causes people to double down), the perception of persecution (debunkers are seen as part of the conspiracy), and the reinforcement of community identity (outsider attacks increase in-group solidarity). The hard problem is that using reason and evidence against a belief system that rejects standard epistemology is like using a water gun to put out a grease fire—it just spreads the flames. The debunker's toolkit (logic, data, authority) is seen by believers as the very tools of the deception.

Example: You meticulously compile scientific studies, satellite photos, and pilot testimonies to debunk Flat Earth theory to a believer. They dismiss it all: the studies are by NASA shills, the photos are CGI, the pilots are in on it. Your effort is seen as proof of how deep the "globe conspiracy" goes. The hard problem: You cannot debunk a claim from outside a person's epistemic framework. Your facts are just more "fake news" to be filtered out. The more you fight the fantasy, the more real it feels to them, turning you into a villain in their narrative and cementing their belief. Hard Problem of Debunking.

by Enkigal January 24, 2026

Hard Problem of Debunking

The meta-problem that arises when rigorous debunking itself fuels the belief it tries to extinguish. A thorough debunking can be interpreted by believers as proof of the cover-up, making the debunker a pawn of the conspiracy. The very act of marshaling evidence and authority can backfire, because the debunker is operating within the "official" paradigm that the believer rejects. This creates a closed, unfalsifiable loop where disproof is seen as the strongest proof.

Example: "I showed him the FAA reports and engineer interviews debunking the chemtrail theory. He smiled and said, 'Of course they'd say that. You just proved how deep it goes.' That's the hard problem of debunking: my evidence wasn't refuted; it was simply re-categorized as part of the conspiracy, making me its unwitting agent."

by AbzuInExile January 31, 2026

Moving the Debunkpost

The act of shifting the required standard for debunking after a debunking attempt has met the previous standard. It ensures the core belief remains perpetually "not yet debunked."

Moving the Debunkpost Example:
"Debunk my psychic claim by showing a flaw in this experiment."
You flaw the experiment.
"That was just one protocol. Debunk it by explaining all psychic phenomena throughout history."
They've moved the debunkpost, changing the requirement from a specific test to an impossible historical proof.

by Dumu The Void February 9, 2026