Quistis
Get the Quistis mug.
cameron quiseng
the sweetest guy in the WORLD and from the band allstar weekend and plays bass and his smile can mean 1,000 words and he dosent break hearts.he loves the song in DA club by 50 cent and his faviourte animal is a giraffe and loves his animals he is currently on tour with Selena Gomez and the scene.he loves children once he wanted to steal some because they were soo cutee :)
person 1:do you know who cameron quiseng is
person 2: yeah hes the sweetest guy ever and when he looks you in the eyes its like hes looking into your heart.
person 1:hes gonna be my husband some day i cant wait :)
person 2: yeah hes the sweetest guy ever and when he looks you in the eyes its like hes looking into your heart.
person 1:hes gonna be my husband some day i cant wait :)
cameron quiseng by redbabe August 2, 2011
Quistastic
Comparable to Quistis in terms of Quistisness. Generally used for females or actions/art of great elegance or other Quitis like attributes.
She is indeed Quistastic.
Quistastic by Jose Hurtado October 24, 2004
quist
quist by quisting af January 28, 2021
Joe Quist Handshake
When a man sees another man sleeping and pulls down his pants and puts his ass next to the sleeping man's face. Then another person takes a picture of this and sends it to everyone.
Joe Quist Handshake by SamuelLJacksonDoppleganger January 24, 2011
quis est beneficium
Latin, "where is the benefit?" A type of logical fallacy in which one claims one didn't do something bad because it was not in one's interests to do so. An example would be, "Why would I steal from the cash register? It's going to hurt the business if I do, and then I might lose my job."
The argument is usually used on behalf of someone else: for example, Ludo Martens (1995) argues that Stalin could not possibly have massacred millions of Russians because he needed them to fight WW2; Fogel & Engermann claimed* that American slavery was not very bad because it was in the best interests of slaveowners to have content slaves.
The argument is a fallacy because it assumes that all relevant motives of the actor are well-established, and lead away from the act. It does not account for motives like personal hatred, shame, fear, spite, ideology, and so on.
________________________
* In *Time on the Cross* (1971); the book was conclusively debunked by David & Stampp, *Reckoning with Slavery* (1976).
The argument is usually used on behalf of someone else: for example, Ludo Martens (1995) argues that Stalin could not possibly have massacred millions of Russians because he needed them to fight WW2; Fogel & Engermann claimed* that American slavery was not very bad because it was in the best interests of slaveowners to have content slaves.
The argument is a fallacy because it assumes that all relevant motives of the actor are well-established, and lead away from the act. It does not account for motives like personal hatred, shame, fear, spite, ideology, and so on.
________________________
* In *Time on the Cross* (1971); the book was conclusively debunked by David & Stampp, *Reckoning with Slavery* (1976).
One frequently encounters *quis est beneficium?* arguments among Holocaust deniers of all stripes. Among such worthies it is claimed that Hitler/Stalin/Enver Pasha could not possibly have wanted to massacre all those millions because it was a nuisance to try.
quis est beneficium by Abu Yahya February 14, 2009