Psychiatric Moralism

A form of moralism where psychiatric diagnoses and categories are used to judge, condemn, and exclude those whose behavior or beliefs deviate from approved norms. The psychiatric moralist treats mental illness not as suffering to be alleviated but as moral failing to be condemned, using diagnostic labels as weapons rather than tools for care. Political dissenters are "crazy," social deviants are "disordered," those who won't conform are "mentally ill." The moralism lies in using the authority of psychiatry to pathologize difference, treating those who don't fit as sick rather than simply different, and deploying diagnostic language as a form of social control rather than healing.

Example: "He dismissed her completely different worldview as 'delusional'—not a clinical judgment, just a way of saying she was wrong. Psychiatric Moralism: using the language of illness to avoid engaging with difference."

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal March 14, 2026

Psychological Puritanism

A purity culture within communities that treat psychological frameworks as the exclusive lens for understanding human experience, where proper psychological thinking becomes a test of virtue and belonging. Psychological puritanism demands that true members analyze all human phenomena through approved psychological concepts, treat alternative frameworks (social, political, economic) as insufficiently deep, and police the boundaries of acceptable psychological discourse relentlessly. Members are judged by their psychological sophistication, their correct use of terminology, their willingness to find psychological explanations for everything. The result is a community that claims to understand human beings while systematically ignoring everything about humans that isn't psychology.

Example: "She tried to discuss structural inequality, but the group kept redirecting to 'childhood trauma' and 'attachment styles'—Psychological Puritanism, where every problem must be psychological to be real."

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal March 14, 2026

Psychiatric Puritanism

A purity culture within communities that elevate psychiatric diagnosis as the primary framework for understanding human difference and distress, where proper diagnostic thinking becomes a test of virtue and belonging. Psychiatric puritanism demands that true members understand all human variation through diagnostic categories, treat non-psychiatric frameworks as naive or unscientific, and maintain the purity of diagnostic boundaries against contamination by alternative approaches. Members compete to demonstrate their diagnostic sophistication, their ability to spot pathology everywhere, their commitment to the medical model against all challenges. The result is a community that claims to help the suffering while pathologizing all human variation and dismissing any approach that doesn't fit diagnostic categories.

Example: "They diagnosed everyone who disagreed with them—not clinically, just as a way of dismissing difference. Psychiatric Puritanism: using the language of diagnosis to police the boundaries of acceptable humanity."

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal March 14, 2026

Psycho-Orthodoxy

The established, institutionalized set of beliefs that dominate mainstream psychology—the often-unexamined assumptions about how to study mind, what counts as psychological knowledge, what methods are valid, and what theories are acceptable. Psycho-orthodoxy includes commitments: that quantitative methods are superior, that laboratory experiments reveal psychological truth, that statistical significance matters more than effect size, that Western populations represent humanity, that individual behavior is the right level of analysis, that psychological findings are universal, that replication crises are methodological rather than theoretical. Like all orthodoxies, it provides a framework for psychological research, but it functions as gatekeeping—determining what research is published, what theories are taught, who gets tenure, and what questions are worth asking. Psycho-orthodoxy shapes not just what we know about mind but what we think it's possible to know, making certain approaches feel scientific and others "soft" or "unscientific."

Example: "Her qualitative research on lived experience was rejected as 'not real psychology'—psycho-orthodoxy, where method defines the field rather than questions. The orthodoxy's power is making its preferences feel like standards."

by Dumu The Void March 17, 2026

Psychological Orthodoxy

The established, institutionalized set of beliefs about human nature that dominate psychological discourse and popular understanding—the often-unexamined assumptions about how people work, what drives behavior, what mental health means, and how change happens. Psychological orthodoxy includes commitments: that the individual is the unit of analysis, that early experience determines adult outcomes, that mental disorders are individual pathologies, that therapy should focus on individual change, that psychological categories (personality, intelligence, disorder) name real things, that Western psychological concepts are universal. Like all orthodoxies, it provides frameworks for understanding self and other, but it functions as ideology—making particular conceptions of personhood seem natural and universal, obscuring how psychological categories are culturally and historically specific, and delegitimizing alternative understandings (collectivist, spiritual, structural). Psychological orthodoxy determines what counts as "healthy" vs "pathological," what explanations are "insightful" vs "superficial," and who counts as "psychologically minded" vs "naive."

Example: "He explained social problems in terms of individual psychology—as if inequality were a matter of personal growth. Psychological orthodoxy had made the individual feel like the only level of analysis."

by Dumu The Void March 17, 2026

Psychiatric Orthodoxy

The established, institutionalized set of beliefs and practices that define mainstream psychiatry—the often-unexamined assumptions about mental illness, diagnosis, treatment, and the role of psychiatry in society. Psychiatric orthodoxy includes commitments: that mental disorders are brain disorders, that diagnosis is objective, that DSM categories name real diseases, that medication is often the best treatment, that psychiatric authority is legitimate, that the current psychiatric system is basically sound, that critics are anti-science or anti-treatment. Like all orthodoxies, it provides frameworks for understanding and treating mental distress, but it functions as institutional power—determining who gets diagnosed with what, what treatments are covered, who counts as mentally ill, and what alternatives are marginalized. Psychiatric orthodoxy shapes not just how we treat mental distress but what we think mental distress is, making particular conceptions of illness seem natural and alternatives (social, psychological, spiritual) seem insufficient.

Example: "She suggested that some distress might be social rather than medical—and was accused of denying mental illness. Psychiatric orthodoxy had made its framework feel like the only way to take suffering seriously."

by Dumu The Void March 17, 2026

Psychoeugenics

A speculative concept referring to the application of eugenic principles to psychology and mental health—the idea of selecting, engineering, or eliminating psychological traits deemed undesirable. Psychoeugenics encompasses historical practices (forced sterilization of people diagnosed with mental illness) and hypothetical futures (genetic selection for "emotional stability," neural engineering for "normal" personality, elimination of neurodivergence). The term connects contemporary mental health discourse to the dark history of eugenics, asking whether the drive to eliminate mental illness can be separated from the drive to eliminate mentally ill people. Critics argue that psychoeugenics repeats eugenic logic by treating psychological variation as defect, framing elimination as treatment, and assuming there is one "healthy" way to be human.

Example: "The campaign to eliminate 'depression genes' through embryo selection was called psychoeugenics—not because it was about curing illness, but because it assumed some people shouldn't exist."

by Abzugal March 22, 2026