Skip to main content

Fluid Multi-Domain Symbolic Intelligence

Fluid Multi-Domain Symbolic Intelligence, or FMSI, is a cognitive capability and self-regulatory framework that enables an individual to transition fluidly, coherently, and intentionally between symbolic systems—while preserving internal logic, role integrity, and operational control. FMSI also refers to a personalized internal system used to impose structure, hierarchy, and coherence on internal processes during periods of instability or transformation.
Fluid Multi-Domain Symbolic Intelligence, or FMSI, is a process that is universal to all human beings, but unique in it's configuration to each depending on the user personalized input over time.

Example: Person A and Person B are saying the same thing but they do not understand the symbolic significance of their own individual FMSI. Person A is overlaying his FMSI on top of Person B's FMSI; and vice versa. Person A and Person B are arguing even though they actually agree.
Fluid Multi-Domain Symbolic Intelligence mug front
Get the Fluid Multi-Domain Symbolic Intelligence mug.
See more merch

Artificial Generic Intelligence 

The level of artificial intelligence humans in the present moment think AI should be able to achieve in the future based only on current needs, expectations, and imagination. It’s basically a moving baseline of “AI smart enough” that will always look outdated in hindsight. It's not what AI actually can do, but what we, stuck in the present, assume it should do one day.

In 2025, people might say a “generic intelligent” AI should be able to wash dishes, write essays, drive cars, and do taxes.

In 2050, those same expectations might sound dumb, because maybe no one even has dishes, homework, or taxes anymore.
Back in the 1800s, artificial generic intelligence would’ve been an AI that milks cows and writes letters for you. Now that’s writing essay and doing taxes, in future would there even be any need of essays.

Director of American Intelligence 

The easiest job in the world.
Why do you laugh when we introduce you to the Minister of National Defence of Canada? We did not even smile when you introduced us to the Minister of Justice of the Russian Federation or the Director of American Intelligence.

Hard Problem of Intelligence

The dilemma of defining and locating the "smoke" of genuine smarts. We can measure performance (IQ, skills, adaptability), but can't pinpoint the fundamental "fire" that produces it. Is intelligence a single, general thing (the g factor), or a bag of tricks? Can it exist without consciousness? If we create an AI that outperforms humans in every task, have we created intelligence, or just an elaborate, hollow simulation? It's the problem of separating the appearance of smart behavior from the elusive, essential quality of understanding that presumably underlies it.
Example: "The chess computer beat the grandmaster, but faced with a collapsed aisle in a grocery store, it's useless. The hard problem of intelligence is figuring out if true smarts is that narrow excellence, or the general, common-sense adaptability to navigate a messy world that the computer utterly lacks." Hard Problem of Intelligence

Hard Problem of Plant Intelligence

Similar to cognition, but focused on adaptive problem-solving. The hard problem is distinguishing between evolved, automated biochemical responses and genuine, flexible intelligence. When a plant shapes its growth to outcompete a neighbor, is it executing a brilliant strategic move, or is it just a biological robot running immutable code written by natural selection? The line is blurred, forcing us to ask if "intelligence" requires an ability to learn anew within a lifetime, or if eons of genetic "learning" can produce something that qualifies.
*Example: "The tree's roots detected a water pipe leak 30 feet away and grew toward it. The hard problem of plant intelligence: Is that a clever solution to a novel problem, showing real-time smarts, or just a lucky coincidence of its always-grow-toward-moisture programming hitting the jackpot?"*

Dynamic-Complex Systems Intelligence

The quantifiable manifestation of problem-solving ability in a complex system. Researchers might measure it by the speed and robustness with which a system returns to function after a perturbation, or by its ability to generate novel solutions (like new metabolic pathways in an ecosystem under stress). It frames intelligence as an emergent service provided by the system's architecture and its capacity for dynamic reorganization.
Example: "The smart grid's dynamic-complex systems intelligence was tested during a major storm. Instead of just failing, it reconfigured flow pathways, isolated damaged segments, and even drew power from electric vehicles plugged into houses—a collective, automatic ingenuity that kept the lights on in the most unexpected ways."

Dynamic-Complex Intelligence

The capacity of a decentralized, adaptive system to solve problems and achieve goals in a variable environment. This intelligence is measured by resilience, adaptability, and the efficiency of its information-energy trade-offs. It's not an IQ score for an individual, but a measure of how well a hive, a city's traffic flow, or an online community can navigate challenges and innovate. The intelligence is in the network's structure and its dynamic rules of engagement.
Example: "The open-source software project exhibited dynamic-complex intelligence. With no boss, thousands of contributors self-organized, debugged code through evolutionary competition, and adapted to new operating systems faster than any corporate behemoth. Its intelligence was a property of its connected, meritocratic chaos."