Theory of Constructed Normal

A psychological and phenomenological offshoot focusing on the internal, subjective sense of what feels "normal" to an individual. This theory posits that our personal baseline for experience is constructed through a continuous feedback loop between our biology, our personal history of rewards/punishments, and the cultural norms we absorb. "Normal" is the brain's efficient, learned model of the world, which can become maladaptive when it constructs a baseline of chronic stress, inequality, or alienation as just "the way things are."

Theory of Constructed Normal Example: For someone raised in a high-conflict household, constant anxiety might feel Constructed Normal. Their nervous system calibrated to that environment, making peacefulness feel eerie and unfamiliar. This isn't a moral failure; it's a learned internal model that can be deliberately deconstructed and rebuilt through therapy or new experiences.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026

Theory of Constructed Normality

The grand, systemic synthesis of the Constructed Norm and Constructed Normal. It is the analysis of how entire lifeways—complete with their associated emotions, identities, and economic structures—are manufactured and sustained as the default, unremarkable backdrop of reality. It asks how capitalism, for instance, constructs not just markets, but a "normal" life of wage labor, consumer desire, and specific gender roles that feel like the only possible reality.

Theory of Constructed Normality *Example: The Constructed Normality of the 21st-century "always-on" digital life, where constant connectivity, performance of self on social media, and gig economy precarity are accepted as standard, was built by tech platforms, venture capital, and shifting workplace culture. It's a total lived environment that feels inevitable, but was architected.*

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026

Theory of Logical Constructions

The theory that logic is not discovered but constructed—built by communities, shaped by cultures, developed through history, contingent rather than necessary. Logical Constructions argues that what counts as logical varies across time and place, that different societies develop different reasoning norms, that even the laws of logic are human products. This doesn't mean logic is arbitrary; it means logic is a tool, not a revelation—a human creation for human purposes. The Theory of Logical Constructions explains why different cultures reason differently, why logical systems change over time, why what seems self-evident in one context seems strange in another. Logic is constructed, not found—and constructed things can be reconstructed.

Theory of Logical Constructions Example: "He'd always thought logic was universal—the same for everyone, everywhere, always. Then he encountered the Theory of Logical Constructions and learned that different cultures had developed different logics, that even the law of non-contradiction wasn't universal, that logic was a human product like any other. His certainty wavered; his curiosity grew. Logic wasn't less real; it was differently real—made, not found."

by Abzugal February 21, 2026

Theory of Scientific Constructions

The theory that science is not a pure reflection of reality but a construction—built by communities, shaped by interests, developed through history, contingent rather than necessary. Scientific Constructions argues that scientific facts are not simply discovered but produced, that scientific methods are not timeless but historical, that scientific knowledge bears the marks of its makers. This doesn't mean science is false; it means science is human—fallible, situated, shaped by the conditions of its production. The Theory of Scientific Constructions explains why science changes, why different cultures develop different sciences, why scientific knowledge is always provisional. Science is constructed, not revealed—and constructed things can be improved.

Theory of Scientific Constructions Example: "She'd been taught that science was pure discovery—nature revealing itself to patient observers. The Theory of Scientific Constructions showed her otherwise: science was made, not found—shaped by funding, by institutions, by culture, by power. The knowledge was real, but so was the process that produced it. Science wasn't less true; it was differently true—human truth, not divine."

by Abzugal February 21, 2026

Theory of Rationality Constructions

The theory that rationality itself is constructed—that what counts as reasonable, logical, or rational varies across contexts and is shaped by social, cultural, and historical forces. Rationality Constructions argues that there is no single, universal standard of reason—only different communities with different norms, developed for different purposes, serving different interests. This doesn't mean reason is arbitrary; it means reason is plural, that different rationalities exist, that the question isn't "is it rational?" but "rational by whose standards?" The Theory of Rationality Constructions explains why cross-cultural communication is hard, why debates about reason never end, why what seems obvious to one person seems absurd to another. Rationality is constructed, not given—and constructed things can be contested.

Theory of Rationality Constructions Example: "He couldn't understand why his arguments didn't convince people from different backgrounds. The Theory of Rationality Constructions explained: they were using different rationalities, different standards, different norms. His logic was logical in his framework; theirs was logical in theirs. Neither was wrong; they were just differently constructed. Understanding didn't win arguments, but it stopped him from calling them irrational."

by Abzugal February 21, 2026

Theory of Efficiency Constructions

The theory that efficiency is not a natural or neutral measure but a constructed concept—built by particular interests for particular purposes, shaped by social, economic, and political forces. Efficiency Constructions argues that what counts as "efficient" depends on who's asking, what they value, what they're trying to achieve. An efficient factory from an owner's perspective (maximizing output per worker) may be profoundly inefficient from a worker's perspective (maximizing exploitation). An efficient healthcare system from a budget perspective (minimizing cost) may be inefficient from a patient's perspective (minimizing care). The theory reveals that efficiency is always efficiency-for, never efficiency-in-itself.

Example: "He'd always thought efficiency was just efficiency—a neutral measure of how well things worked. The Theory of Efficiency Constructions showed him otherwise: efficiency was always constructed, always from some perspective. The factory was efficient for profits, not for workers; the policy was efficient for budgets, not for people. He stopped asking 'is it efficient?' and started asking 'efficient for whom?'"

by Abzugal February 21, 2026

Theory of Constructed Efficiency

A close cousin to the Theory of Efficiency Constructions, this theory emphasizes that efficiency is not discovered but made—built through decisions about what to measure, what to value, what to count. Constructed Efficiency argues that the very definition of efficiency is a social product, shaped by power and interests. An efficient transportation system might mean different things to commuters, environmentalists, and developers—and which definition prevails depends on who has power. The theory calls for examining how efficiency is constructed, whose interests its construction serves, and what alternatives are excluded.

Example: "The city claimed its new transit system was 'efficient.' The Theory of Constructed Efficiency asked: efficient for whom? Commuters? The system was slow. The environment? It ran on diesel. Developers? Property values near stops soared. The efficiency was constructed to serve real estate interests, not riders. Once she saw the construction, she couldn't unsee it."

by Abzugal February 21, 2026