A game played with the traditional board game "guess who" but with slightly different rules. The difference is that a given question can only be asked once over a period of multiple games (usually for the whole weekend, or however long you're trapped in the cabin with nothing to do except play guess who, but possibly forever!).
If someone asks a repeat question, they lose.
Since the number of objective, declarative questions is rather finite, the later stages of No-Repeat Guess Who are similar to subjective guess who.
Questions are identified by their meaning - you can't change the word order, or add a trivial extra phrase, to ask what is essentially the same question twice.
If someone asks a repeat question, they lose.
Since the number of objective, declarative questions is rather finite, the later stages of No-Repeat Guess Who are similar to subjective guess who.
Questions are identified by their meaning - you can't change the word order, or add a trivial extra phrase, to ask what is essentially the same question twice.
by firebus July 22, 2010
Get the No-Repeat Guess Whomug. This is a social game popularized by TikTok with two versions:
Version 1 (Original):
1. In a small group, one player closes their eyes.
2. Using hand gestures, everyone else settles on a number between 1 to 10, representing the secret rating.
3. The player with their eyes closed opens their eyes and gives each player a category.
4. Players provide an answer from the category that represents the secret rating.
5. The player with their eyes closed tries to guess the secret rating.
Version 2:
1. In a small group or with at least 2 people, one person thinks of a number between 1 to 10.
2. Without saying the number out loud. Everyone else takes turns giving the rating holder a category.
3. The number holder provides an answer that closely matches the secret rating.
4. Players get ready to guess the secret rating based on the answers provided.
5. The winners are those who guess the number correctly.
Version 2 is often more fun as everyone gets involved in guessing the number. Version 1 can be more passive with a less exciting end.
Version 1 (Original):
1. In a small group, one player closes their eyes.
2. Using hand gestures, everyone else settles on a number between 1 to 10, representing the secret rating.
3. The player with their eyes closed opens their eyes and gives each player a category.
4. Players provide an answer from the category that represents the secret rating.
5. The player with their eyes closed tries to guess the secret rating.
Version 2:
1. In a small group or with at least 2 people, one person thinks of a number between 1 to 10.
2. Without saying the number out loud. Everyone else takes turns giving the rating holder a category.
3. The number holder provides an answer that closely matches the secret rating.
4. Players get ready to guess the secret rating based on the answers provided.
5. The winners are those who guess the number correctly.
Version 2 is often more fun as everyone gets involved in guessing the number. Version 1 can be more passive with a less exciting end.
by pseudonameAlias December 30, 2023
Get the Secret rating guessing gamemug. Hym "Aw, shit guys, I guess it's, crabz season. I guess I'll have to go around. The tidal wave of crabz is crossing the fucking street so I guess I'll take a fucking detour. That or I'm the asshole running over crabz. Fuck crabz. They should throw me a fucking parade for running over those little cock-suckers. You're welcome."
by Hym Iam September 22, 2023
Get the Aw, shit guys, I guess it's, crabz season. I guess I'll have to go around.mug. by Jacob Law February 11, 2022
Get the Cameron Guessmug. I mean, you have clearly committed yourself to devaluing what I've done.
Hym "Saying 'If that's the case, you can do that immediately. There's a company named this and it does that and you can use that to do this.' And even Jordan Peterson statement about AI being unable to perceive if just a combination of statements I made. Specially 'The religion is nested in an interpretive practice that allows you to read your own morality into the text' and 'We don't think in words. We think in amorphous abstraction. Which is why we use the wrong words sometimes. Or how we can say the same thing in multiple languages.' These are observations I'm making.
Hym "Saying 'If that's the case, you can do that immediately. There's a company named this and it does that and you can use that to do this.' And even Jordan Peterson statement about AI being unable to perceive if just a combination of statements I made. Specially 'The religion is nested in an interpretive practice that allows you to read your own morality into the text' and 'We don't think in words. We think in amorphous abstraction. Which is why we use the wrong words sometimes. Or how we can say the same thing in multiple languages.' These are observations I'm making.
That isn't a guess. And Jordan didn't even know that what he was saying wasn't true because he is just stealing ideas from a greater mind. The idea to build these massive data sets is inference I'm making from what I know about how we go about building technology. You don't like that I trivialized the retard's success so you are doing it to me... Except the retards success is the result of the arbitrary decision of someone selecting preferentially because she likes fat cocks and mine is the result of having a 1 out of 8 billion intellect. You wanted to teach somebody a lesson and ACCIDENTALLY got a bunch of kids murdered. The danger was real. You aren't or shouldn't be in a position to tell a better, more accomplished mind how it ought to think. And you are directly responsible for those kids getting murdered. You tried to hoist me on my own petard and you overshot it and it landed right in the middle of a classroom in Texas. Stop defending that fucking cripple. He doesn't matter and neither do you. He's molested too many little girls to matter and you have gotten too many children killed. Wait... YOU live in Texas... Don't you Matt Dillahunty? Did you read this and decide that you world be the savior and mind-rape people into being more progressive and then get a bunch of kids murdered?"
by Hym Iam April 5, 2025
Get the Guessmug. <.7.9.7.6.>Angel Hellstrom Jose Robles I Root Out Answers Out Of Guesses, What Am I? Angel Jose Robles, ALso Know As, Hellstrom Imaweli Tanna: A Strategist<.7.9.7.6.>
<.7.9.7.6.>Angel Hellstrom Jose Robles I Root Out Answers Out Of Guesses, What Am I? Angel Jose Robles, ALso Know As, Hellstrom Imaweli Tanna: A Strategist<.7.9.7.6.>
by TheGeneralGenitalsPranksterian May 10, 2025
Get the <.7.9.7.6.>Angel Hellstrom Jose Robles I Root Out Answers Out Of Guesses, What Am I? Angel Jose Robles, ALso Know As, Hellstrom Imaweli Tanna: A Strategist<.7.9.7.6.>mug. If the recipient asks, "What?", after receiving this question, there is a risk that the giver of the question will respond with, "Chicken butt". In the event that this occurs, the recipient will be shunned by their peers for being so careless.
by GoofyGoober10 January 23, 2025
Get the Guess what?mug.