by Keqing March 7, 2021

Someone who distrusts vaccines because "you never know what they put in them" but will gladly smoke cigarettes and eat enough junk food that will make their body beg for an amputation.
Anti-vaxxer: Hmm, I dunno about the COVID vaccine. I mean, who knows what sort of chemicals they put in that stuff? *shovels McDonald's into mouth* Not to mention the government uses it to microchip you. Who would ever want to be tracked like that? Whoops, I'm getting a call on my iPhone.
by That thing in your eye March 24, 2023

A very small portion of the anti-furry 'cult' that is actually knowledgable unlike the 7-11 olds and the adults that won't grow up out there, AKA the general anti-furry 'community'. These people don't dislike furries in general, except for the ones actually reasonable to hate (eg. P3dos, Corn artists, Toxic people, Fetishizers, and more). Even if they hate them, they don't usually raid/nuke or spy on furry servers, nor do they shove it up the furry's face or do anything to the extreme level about it.
person: look it's an anti-furry
rational anti-furry: no no you misunderstood, i only hate the weird people
person: oh yeah lemme guess, the furry members of lgbtq+?
rational anti-furry: no
person: the femboys or tomgirls?
rational anti-furry: no
rational anti-furry: i'm just talking about the weird ppl that be toxic and make graphic content of it and stuff
person: *realizes* ohhh i understand now
rational anti-furry: :)
rational anti-furry: no no you misunderstood, i only hate the weird people
person: oh yeah lemme guess, the furry members of lgbtq+?
rational anti-furry: no
person: the femboys or tomgirls?
rational anti-furry: no
rational anti-furry: i'm just talking about the weird ppl that be toxic and make graphic content of it and stuff
person: *realizes* ohhh i understand now
rational anti-furry: :)
by anonymous94536 January 18, 2024

When someone claims to be fishing for reactions and gets a reaction however is denied the fish due to them actually believing what they said. A fish will only be rewarded to fisher if the content used is controversial and something they don't actually believe is true.
Therefore the fishee has rights to an appeal if they believe the fisher was using their statement to form a true debate or argument but later claimed a fish after a reaction was received.
Therefore the fishee has rights to an appeal if they believe the fisher was using their statement to form a true debate or argument but later claimed a fish after a reaction was received.
For example, Jordan was anti-fishing on many public forums regarding the Australian cricket team's ball tampering plot. But because the stance he took was a stance he believed in, all reactions he received were not counted as successful fishes.
by Mvpease May 17, 2018

by eggiegod June 10, 2021

Person 1: I don't really want kids.
Karen: Not wanting kids is anti-biology, anti-natalist, and absolutely horrible! You should be ashamed!
Person 1: ...
Karen: Not wanting kids is anti-biology, anti-natalist, and absolutely horrible! You should be ashamed!
Person 1: ...
by pizzazz dude October 4, 2019

by A cool Guy9329 May 19, 2023
