A Social Justice Couch Potato (SJCP) is a Social Justice Warrior (SJW) that does absolutely nothing about the social injustices they dislike. Most SJW's are actually SJCP's.
"I'm such an Social Justice Warrior."
"No, all you do is sit there and complain. You're more of an Social Justice Couch Potato . . . "
"No, all you do is sit there and complain. You're more of an Social Justice Couch Potato . . . "
by Social Justice Couch Potato July 27, 2020
Get the Social Justice Couch Potato mug.Ben - Did you see the CIA just disclosed the Russians are behind directed energy attacks against official Americans in Havana and elsewhere?
Harold - Dude, we don’t use the term CIA anymore! It’s the “Langley Foundation for Social Betterment”
Ben - Dude, you’re wack.
Harold - Dude, we don’t use the term CIA anymore! It’s the “Langley Foundation for Social Betterment”
Ben - Dude, you’re wack.
by Mil3druid4 July 19, 2021
Get the Langley Foundation for Social Betterment mug.A derogatory term used to define an obnoxious person (usually associated with the radical left) that pushes their ideology /opnions and/or beliefs and/or lashes out at fellow human beings in an aggressive and controlling manner concerning almost anything that they personally don't agree with usually validating their emotions by them simply being present above rationality not taking into account another persons humanity commonly disregarding a fellow person as a valid human being simply by their expressed viewpoints. A scientifically defined and paradoxically occuring phenomenon in the mindset of people acting like "SJW" is the core idea that they have a valid opinion about certain changes in society that must be followed even tough not using the ability to change themselves coming forth out of selfishness, arrogance, spite for the succesfull and a bad mental hygiene. All in all a crusade type of mentallity that tends to show that they fight for what they think are the dispossessed while not fully realising their own disposition, pretending to be a dispossessed or labeling everyone that doesn't agree with their viewpoints as a (right wing) biggot and/or opressor to justify their own right in doing so. Eventough the term is linked to the radical left it is does not exclude the existence of "SJW" on the radical right thereby it seems the labelling of someone as an "SJW" comes forth more out of a radical interaction with fellow people rather than a political ideology.
-A:"How could you not have voted for Trump? You are the reason why America is going to shit!"
-B:"This person is a typical example of a Radical Right wing "SJW (social Justice Warrior)"."
-A: "Joe Rogan expressed some viewpoints that i don't agree with in a certain soundbit of one of his episodes, what a biggot, he should be cancelled in full!"
-B:"Typical example of a radical left wing "SJW (Social Justice Warrior)"."
-B:"This person is a typical example of a Radical Right wing "SJW (social Justice Warrior)"."
-A: "Joe Rogan expressed some viewpoints that i don't agree with in a certain soundbit of one of his episodes, what a biggot, he should be cancelled in full!"
-B:"Typical example of a radical left wing "SJW (Social Justice Warrior)"."
by No Side Reflection February 2, 2022
Get the SJW (Social Justice Warrior) mug.A conservative who backs the enactment of invasive, usually expensive laws which allow for the government to regulate or micromanage the behavior, relationships or identity of private citizens, or to prohibit government recognition of certain of these traits, based upon the need to "preserve" said individual's idealized "natural" or "godly" order for society (or to create social programs - usually of the "feel good" type - pursuant to such ideals of a "Moral Majority").
Usually a conservative who uses a religious case or justification for why the government must pass legislation (or engage in international conflicts, such as the "War on Drugs") in order to play "moral police" with the citizenry or world.
Such conservatives' self-described credentials as "conservative" are often questioned or sometimes rejected by fiscal conservatives and right-libertarians (including the Grover Norquist anti-tax types) because of such programs take up fiscal resources for potentially never-ending or unwinnable wars. Of course, when culture wars are being fought both in the US and abroad by non-government entities (such as churches), the fiscal conservatives and libertarians are often quiet and compliant for as long as *government* money is not being directed to such wars; the richer of the BGSCs (e.g., Pat Robertson) have free license to carry out such wars.
Usually a conservative who uses a religious case or justification for why the government must pass legislation (or engage in international conflicts, such as the "War on Drugs") in order to play "moral police" with the citizenry or world.
Such conservatives' self-described credentials as "conservative" are often questioned or sometimes rejected by fiscal conservatives and right-libertarians (including the Grover Norquist anti-tax types) because of such programs take up fiscal resources for potentially never-ending or unwinnable wars. Of course, when culture wars are being fought both in the US and abroad by non-government entities (such as churches), the fiscal conservatives and libertarians are often quiet and compliant for as long as *government* money is not being directed to such wars; the richer of the BGSCs (e.g., Pat Robertson) have free license to carry out such wars.
"The social conservative leaders who advocate using government to achieve their aims always push the GOP to embrace big government whenever the GOP takes power. Here's how it works:
1. Republicans gain control based on promises of limited government.
2. We get a few years of somewhat limited government, especially if the president is a Democrat.
3. We then watch the biggest statists in America -- big government social conservatives -- demand that the federal government "do something" about every perceived social ill in America.
4. We then watch the GOP respond to social con threats by becoming 100% statist. Every time the GOP gains ascendancy, it eventually decides it ought to use the power of the federal government to force "conservative" (in quotes because big government is never conservative) goals. It assumes that other conservatives will just toe the line (like the OP suggests).
5. Voters then kick the GOP out of power.
6. We then watch the GOP at least pretend to believe in small government (many in the coalition will simply wish to limit power of Dems, thus forming an accidental coalition).
7. Repeat"
-- Rich Muny, BigGovernment.com (Breitbart-owned outlet)
1. Republicans gain control based on promises of limited government.
2. We get a few years of somewhat limited government, especially if the president is a Democrat.
3. We then watch the biggest statists in America -- big government social conservatives -- demand that the federal government "do something" about every perceived social ill in America.
4. We then watch the GOP respond to social con threats by becoming 100% statist. Every time the GOP gains ascendancy, it eventually decides it ought to use the power of the federal government to force "conservative" (in quotes because big government is never conservative) goals. It assumes that other conservatives will just toe the line (like the OP suggests).
5. Voters then kick the GOP out of power.
6. We then watch the GOP at least pretend to believe in small government (many in the coalition will simply wish to limit power of Dems, thus forming an accidental coalition).
7. Repeat"
-- Rich Muny, BigGovernment.com (Breitbart-owned outlet)
by RayneVanDunem November 26, 2010
Get the big government social conservative mug.One who is uncontrollably awkward in social situations. This person, in normal everyday life, may seem rather normal, but when thrown into a social situation, the person is suddenly petrified, unable to speak or act in any way that is not completely uncomfortable for all who bear witness. This syndrome is sometimes hereditary, though typically develops in preteen years and lasts through adulthood. Not to be confused with an actual mental handicap.
"The strangest thing has been happening to me lately," said Shauna. "I'll be completely fine one moment, and when I enter a social situation, I suddenly can't act or speak in any way that is not completely uncomfortable and humiliating."
It's not a mental illness, I think you have been struck by the SAS (Social Awkwardness Syndrome)!" Said Susan. "It affects one in every three adults, and targets those who work in corporate settings, especially stock exchanges.
It's not a mental illness, I think you have been struck by the SAS (Social Awkwardness Syndrome)!" Said Susan. "It affects one in every three adults, and targets those who work in corporate settings, especially stock exchanges.
by zoewondrpup March 11, 2011
Get the SAS (Social Awkwardness Syndrome) mug.If friends spend more then 60 minutes unable to decide what to do, they must default to sexual experimentation
the Defination is pretty clear... rule social b 99.1 is to be used when friends cannot decide what to do for 60 minutes or more.
by Sky Claw September 2, 2009
Get the rule social b 99.1 mug.The criminal elements of BLM, especially the youths, are neither genetically criminal by nature nor totally socially functional. They come from families that victims of the social disorganization theory
by Sexydimma March 8, 2021
Get the Social disorganization theory mug.