Every year, the
London Times ranks the best colleges in the world. In the most recent edition of the Times Higher Education Supplement, UCLA was ranked number 26 in the world. Cal was ranked number 2 in the world. Stanford was ranked number 7. Where do you think USC was ranked in the world?
USC was ranked number 180 in the world by the
London Times! I guess your entrance requirements aren't helping you much.
US News had UCLA ranked at number 25, Cal ranked at number 21, and USC ranked at number 30 for this year. That's because they consider the amount of
money alumni give to each
school. Of course private schools like USC
will have inflated rankings in the US News guide. And even with that, UCLA is ranked higher in the US News list.
Let's see here...UCLA-26, USC-180...USC better in academics? Please!
It's a known fact that UCLA looks at more than just your scores when selecting students. Ask anybody who's been turned down by the
school. You need extracurricular activities as well as high gpa and SAT scores.
And to the morons at SC who say they don't pay $30,000 a year, if you're getting loans, you
will be paying for it. Unless you get grants or scholarships, you
will be paying that community college in the ghetto sooner or later. Fight on for higher fees at a much lesser
school!
According to the
London Times, UCLA is number 26 in the world academically. And USC is 180. Wow.
Maybe USC needs to make the entrance requirements
even tougher.
