Theory of Constructed Hegemony

The concept, from Gramsci, that a ruling class maintains power not just through force, but by constructing the cultural and ideological "common sense" of an era. Hegemony is built when the dominant group's worldview—its values, beliefs, and social structures—becomes so normalized in media, schools, and everyday life that it's seen as the natural, inevitable order, not as one constructed arrangement among many. Consent is manufactured by making the constructed feel like the given.

*Example: "The idea that working a 9-5 for a corporation is the 'normal' path to a good life is a triumph of constructed hegemony. It wasn't always so. Through 20th-century media, education, and suburbia, this specific life model was built as the default dream. The Theory of Constructed Hegemony shows how questioning it feels like questioning reality itself, because the construction is so complete it hides its own seams."*

by Abzu Land January 31, 2026

Theory of the Hegemony of Scientific Paradigms

An examination of how, once a paradigm wins, it establishes total intellectual dominance, becoming the invisible, unquestioned foundation for all "serious" work in a field. This hegemony is maintained through textbooks, grant funding, journal editorial boards, and university hiring, which all reinforce the paradigm's basic assumptions. To challenge the hegemony is to risk being labeled a crank, even if your critique is valid.

Theory of the Hegemony of Scientific Paradigms Example: The near-total Hegemony of the Big Bang theory in cosmology for decades meant that alternative theories like the Steady State model were excluded from major conferences and funding. Proposing alternatives was career suicide, a perfect example of how a reigning paradigm polices its borders and maintains intellectual monopoly power.

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026

Theory of Scientific Hegemony

The most pervasive form of control, where the scientific worldview becomes the dominant, "common sense" framework for understanding reality itself. It’s when scientific authority extends beyond the lab to shape culture, ethics, and politics, making alternative ways of knowing (e.g., spiritual, artistic, traditional) seem pre-modern or invalid.

Theory of Scientific Hegemony *Example: The mantra "Follow the Science!" during a public health crisis. While well-intentioned, it can establish a scientific hegemony where complex political trade-offs (liberty vs. security) or ethical choices are framed as purely technical problems with a single scientific solution. This sidelines democratic debate and frames dissent as "anti-science," consolidating authority in expert institutions.

by Dumu The Void February 7, 2026

Spheres of Hegemony Theory

An extension of Gramscian hegemony, mapping how dominance is secured not just through coercion but through intellectual and moral leadership across multiple social spheres. A ruling bloc achieves hegemony when its worldview becomes common sense in the educational sphere, its economic arrangements seem natural in the labor sphere, its values saturate the cultural sphere, and its political options exhaust the electoral sphere. Hegemony is power that has become invisible because it has colonized the taken-for-granted assumptions of every sphere.

Spheres of Hegemony Theory Example: Neoliberal hegemony manifests across spheres: in the economic sphere, privatization is "efficiency"; in the educational sphere, students are "customers"; in the cultural sphere, self-optimization is a moral duty; in the political sphere, deregulation is the only "realistic" option. No one needs to force these ideas; they are the water everyone swims in. Spheres of Hegemony Theory analyzes how a single logic saturates diverse domains until alternatives become literally unimaginable.

by Dumu The Void February 11, 2026

Theory of Logical Hegemony

The critical theory proposing that dominant groups maintain power not just through force or economics, but through control over what counts as "logical" in the first place. According to this theory, the rules of logic aren't universal and neutral—they're tools of hegemony, designed to privilege certain ways of thinking while marginalizing others. Western logic (non-contradiction, excluded middle, linear reasoning) becomes the standard against which all other reasoning is judged, making indigenous epistemologies, feminine modes of thought, and non-Western philosophies appear "illogical" simply because they operate by different rules. The theory of logical hegemony explains why "that doesn't make sense" often really means "that doesn't fit my cultural framework," and why marginalized groups are constantly forced to translate their experiences into dominant logical forms to be heard.

Example: "She invoked the theory of logical hegemony when her professor dismissed indigenous knowledge as 'unscientific.' 'You're not evaluating their logic,' she said. 'You're imposing yours. The hegemony of Western rationality decides what counts as knowledge, and everything else gets called myth.' The professor said she was being relativistic. She said he was being hegemonic. Neither convinced the other, but she felt better for naming it."

by Dumu The Void February 15, 2026