The Indian Internet theory is an online conspiracy theory that asserts that the Internet now consists mainly of Indian population activity and automatically generated content that is manipulated by Indian-based curation algorithm, marginalizing organic human activity.
Based on the worldwide population statistics there are 1.4 billion population of India excluding descendants from India and people that speak the language from that country. Over 53% of the world has access to the internet, China has the great firewall, USA has their own self-interest, and the most populous countries include Indonesia, Pakistan, Congo, Brazil, Bangladesh, Russia, Mexico, and so on barely spoke English or have access to internet, meanwhile India has the most population of English speakers.
This corresponds with the idea that you will bound to stumble on accounts made and operated based in India especially in posts with subjects of sports (they will sneak something about cricket), religion, and white fitness bikini models.
Based on the worldwide population statistics there are 1.4 billion population of India excluding descendants from India and people that speak the language from that country. Over 53% of the world has access to the internet, China has the great firewall, USA has their own self-interest, and the most populous countries include Indonesia, Pakistan, Congo, Brazil, Bangladesh, Russia, Mexico, and so on barely spoke English or have access to internet, meanwhile India has the most population of English speakers.
This corresponds with the idea that you will bound to stumble on accounts made and operated based in India especially in posts with subjects of sports (they will sneak something about cricket), religion, and white fitness bikini models.
Those aren't Russian & Israeli Bot accounts, those are just Kumar, Pradesh, and Rajesh they are part of The Indian Internet Theory
by Ibonarious Eshak February 11, 2024
Get the The Indian Internet Theory mug.The Indian Internet theory is an online conspiracy theory that asserts that the Internet now consists mainly of Indian people activity and Indian generated content that is manipulated by Indian population preferences, marginalizing organic human activity.
The population of India reaches 1.4 billion people and out of these people they have the most English speakers along with governmental efforts to introduce modern Internet to rural areas, but this does not equate to a quality increase of human resources which takes time. China as the 2nd most populous country limits their interaction with the worldwide internet due to the Great Chinese Firewall, USA has their own self-interest for online interactions, and the rest of the countries which includes Indonesia, Pakistan, Congo, Bangladesh, Brazil, Mexico, and so on barely spoke English or have access to Internet.
This corresponds well with the idea that most accounts were operated in India, examples of this can be observed in posts with topics ranging from sports (they will sneak cricket for some reason), politics (they will defend Israel), religion (something about Shiva or Ram), and bikini fitness models.
The population of India reaches 1.4 billion people and out of these people they have the most English speakers along with governmental efforts to introduce modern Internet to rural areas, but this does not equate to a quality increase of human resources which takes time. China as the 2nd most populous country limits their interaction with the worldwide internet due to the Great Chinese Firewall, USA has their own self-interest for online interactions, and the rest of the countries which includes Indonesia, Pakistan, Congo, Bangladesh, Brazil, Mexico, and so on barely spoke English or have access to Internet.
This corresponds well with the idea that most accounts were operated in India, examples of this can be observed in posts with topics ranging from sports (they will sneak cricket for some reason), politics (they will defend Israel), religion (something about Shiva or Ram), and bikini fitness models.
Those are not Russian bots, that's just Rajesh, Kumar, and Pradesh they are a part of the Indian Internet Theory!
by Ibonarious Eshak February 11, 2024
Get the The Indian Internet Theory mug.by GucciGotch February 13, 2024
Get the Animal Theory mug.In terms of dating, the Brad Pitt Rule suggests that if you're uncertain about whether to pursue a romantic interest or go on a date with someone, imagine if Brad Pitt asked you out instead. If the thought of going on a date with the person in question doesn't excite you as much as the thought of going on a date with Brad Pitt would, then it might indicate that the romantic interest isn't as strong or compatible as it could be. Essentially, it's a way to evaluate your level of attraction and interest in a potential romantic partner.
Like if a woman imposes some arbitrary time frame, move on. Seth’s Brad Pitt theory suggests She’s definitely fucking Brad on a first date.
by Slamdiesel February 15, 2024
Get the Seth’s Brad Pitt theory mug.1) The jobs that AI (the latest generation of computing technology) will largely be isolated to many of the same jobs the previous generation of computers created, facilitated or enabled, and the technology will allow the workers left in a given job to do the work of 10, decimating the demand for any specific set of skills under the previous technical paradigm. The upshot is that - for a time - jobs which are not dependent on computers (e.g. carpenters, police, paramedics, doctors, refuse workers, power linesmen) will be less impacted by the rollout of ML and AI. And while, say, AI may beget only 10% of the previous need for architects using computers to draft, there will remain a need for program managers, prompt engineers, developers, mathematicians and system engineers needed to centrally manage AI and ML systems. 2) Eventually technology will advance the point that corporations push to have androids perform the remaining jobs that only humans could perform (e.g. carpenters, police, paramedics, doctors, refuse workers, power linesmen)and regions will need to have that debate on whether technology and commerce are the more important that human-centricity and a moralized human populace. Put forth by marketer, Zackery West (FlashPointLabs) on February 8th, 2024.
"I'm a mailman, so, according to West's Theory Of Isolated Economic Decimation, my job delivering mail should be fine as the Postal Service grows more efficient at correctly finding addresses to route dead letters to, and scheduling delivery drivers."
by Zack West February 18, 2024
Get the West's Theory Of Isolated Economic Decimation mug.Summary: AI will specifically destroy jobs created by computers in the first place, preserving 'offline' jobs, while minimally impacting work quality, and preserving gross productivity.
1) The jobs that AI destroys will largely be isolated to many of the same jobs the computers created, facilitated or enabled, 2) The more that workers in a given field were reliant upon computers, the lower the percentage of them will be required to accomplish the same output after AI is deployed; this reduction in demand for workers could be up to 90% in some market segments. 3) When this happens, work quality only suffers slightly; 4) When this happens, productivity is not reduced, and some companies may scale-up fewer workers to surpass previous productivity levels.
The take-away is that jobs that were largely or entirely not dependent on computers (or which predate computer) will be less impacted by the rollout of ML and AI. These jobs include carpenters, police, paramedics, doctors, refuse workers, power linesmen.
This will remain true until corporations push culture if not laws to have androids perform those remaining jobs left to humans (e.g. carpenters, police, paramedics, doctors, refuse workers, power linesmen). At that point, society will debate whether productivity is more important that anthropocentrism and protecting a moralized, industrious, human populations.
Put forth by Zackery West, marketer, in 2024.
reworded and resubmitted
1) The jobs that AI destroys will largely be isolated to many of the same jobs the computers created, facilitated or enabled, 2) The more that workers in a given field were reliant upon computers, the lower the percentage of them will be required to accomplish the same output after AI is deployed; this reduction in demand for workers could be up to 90% in some market segments. 3) When this happens, work quality only suffers slightly; 4) When this happens, productivity is not reduced, and some companies may scale-up fewer workers to surpass previous productivity levels.
The take-away is that jobs that were largely or entirely not dependent on computers (or which predate computer) will be less impacted by the rollout of ML and AI. These jobs include carpenters, police, paramedics, doctors, refuse workers, power linesmen.
This will remain true until corporations push culture if not laws to have androids perform those remaining jobs left to humans (e.g. carpenters, police, paramedics, doctors, refuse workers, power linesmen). At that point, society will debate whether productivity is more important that anthropocentrism and protecting a moralized, industrious, human populations.
Put forth by Zackery West, marketer, in 2024.
reworded and resubmitted
"I'm a USPS door delivery mailman, so, according to West's Theory Of Specific Economic Destruction, my job delivering mail should be fine even if the Postal Service grows more efficient at correctly routing addresses and scheduling delivery drivers."
by Zack West February 18, 2024
Get the West's Theory Of Specific Economic Destruction mug.Not to be confused with the study.
When you come up with a theory for a subjects that shares or identifies similar aspects, of which imply another theory. This theory confirms another, in logic with what’s been expressed, whether directly or indirectly.
Symbolic in relation. Hint of mutuality. Sarcasm marked.
When you come up with a theory for a subjects that shares or identifies similar aspects, of which imply another theory. This theory confirms another, in logic with what’s been expressed, whether directly or indirectly.
Symbolic in relation. Hint of mutuality. Sarcasm marked.
Larry - “The time doesn’t shoot too far out as he loops further, I think he gets killed in the end.”
Tom- “That would make sense why blood stains appear later in the loops as he keeps looping further. Cool confirmation theory.”
Larry-“Stfu Tom! That’s not gonna happen.”
Tom- “That would make sense why blood stains appear later in the loops as he keeps looping further. Cool confirmation theory.”
Larry-“Stfu Tom! That’s not gonna happen.”
by 1ksoss February 22, 2024
Get the Confirmation theory mug.