1: A suggestion that is delivered with encouragement.
2: An idea that does not truly exist and is an excuse for trying to politely state that someone could easily do better, or that they are awful at whatever the constructive compliment is aimed at.
3: Something one makes up in Home Economics because your group is crap at their cooking assignment and only you seem to know it, saying that they can do much better in a politer way than saying "Dude, are you really this bad? You can fucking do better."
See constructive criticism and compliment.
2: An idea that does not truly exist and is an excuse for trying to politely state that someone could easily do better, or that they are awful at whatever the constructive compliment is aimed at.
3: Something one makes up in Home Economics because your group is crap at their cooking assignment and only you seem to know it, saying that they can do much better in a politer way than saying "Dude, are you really this bad? You can fucking do better."
See constructive criticism and compliment.
Person No. 1: "Hey Person, how about you do this? You're doing well now but I think that would make it a lot better."
Person No. 2: "Constructive compliment
Person No. 2: "Constructive compliment
by Gr_y_Jay January 25, 2022
by Zeeeebruh May 13, 2019
The so-called "robert construction" is a slang for a specific type of an organisation system which is applicable for box-shaped pieces of furniture with doors or drawers for storing miscellaneous items. The essence of "robert construction" is literally the items to be placed in a way that they will most probably fall down on your forehead at the moment that you try to reach some of the items or simply at the time of opening the door itself. In a more metaphorically way it would be called twisted tetris.
Oh my, I've tried to take a coffee cup from the cabinet yesterday morning and it was such a robert construction there that today I'm watching "The Simpson's" from the hospital with a broken nose and a huge bump on my forehead!
by Foxy Wild December 09, 2020
by CrayonEater4259 May 25, 2023
When an individual gives critisism of a piece of work in a way, which directly describe the part of the work they found inadequate or unpleasant usually backed up with arguments/their reasoning for why they found it so.
This form of critisism is often meant as a genuine help for the original creator of the work to improve in the future, though it is up to the person receiving the critisism to reflect on and see if they agree with it.
An individual who becomes enraged when receiving constructive criticism is reffered to as a "Dick"
This form of critisism is often meant as a genuine help for the original creator of the work to improve in the future, though it is up to the person receiving the critisism to reflect on and see if they agree with it.
An individual who becomes enraged when receiving constructive criticism is reffered to as a "Dick"
Boy I sure am happy that someone gave me constructive criticism that I can use to reflect on my work and improve on it in the future, instead of just saying "bro this shit is fucking ass".
I should be very thankful they took the time to actually write constructive criticism that might help me gain a different perspective and see flaws in my own work, which I might have overlooked due to personal bias for my own work, instead of writing "bro this shit is fucking ass".
I really am lucky to not have my head so high up my own ass, that I am able to look at this constructive criticism and gain some valuable insight that I would not have been able to if they just wrote "BRO THIS SHIT IS FUCKING ASS".
I should be very thankful they took the time to actually write constructive criticism that might help me gain a different perspective and see flaws in my own work, which I might have overlooked due to personal bias for my own work, instead of writing "bro this shit is fucking ass".
I really am lucky to not have my head so high up my own ass, that I am able to look at this constructive criticism and gain some valuable insight that I would not have been able to if they just wrote "BRO THIS SHIT IS FUCKING ASS".
by Tipsy Hyena April 14, 2024
People who work a blue collar life that are always lifting up heavy things and exerting strength through there body at work. These people may look super scrawny but can lift some heavy shit defying the odds.
by Bignutsnodust September 07, 2022
Constructive Kidnapping: A term denoting a situation where an individual is unlawfully detained and relocated under the pretext of legal authority, through manipulation of legal processes or evidence, rather than direct physical abduction. This typically involves law enforcement officers who deliberately fabricate evidence or create false narratives to establish probable cause for an unlawful arrest and movement. It's characterized by the use of legal systems to achieve the effect of traditional kidnapping — the unauthorized restriction of an individual's freedom. Such incidents are often meticulously planned and documented, designed to bolster the appearance of legitimacy and legal justification, particularly if the victim reacts defensively.
Example:
In Oakland, CA, LaJuana A. Reid's encounter with constructive kidnapping began unfolding 45 days after she filed a complaint about illegal cannabis activity. Officer John Romero, in a clear violation of MOR 398.96, meticulously constructed a false narrative against her during this period. Fifteen days after filing a false police report, Romero notified his informant cousin of the situation. Then, 20 days before having his cousin file a TRO, which Romero had written, he set the stage for the subsequent legal actions. This planning ensured that when LaJuana was arrested and taken 22 miles to jail, the incident was not only strategically timed but also documented in a manner that could be used to manipulate public perception and witness testimony. Such orchestration in constructive kidnapping reveals the dangerous extent to which legal authority can be abused, transforming the police's role from protector to predator.
In Oakland, CA, LaJuana A. Reid's encounter with constructive kidnapping began unfolding 45 days after she filed a complaint about illegal cannabis activity. Officer John Romero, in a clear violation of MOR 398.96, meticulously constructed a false narrative against her during this period. Fifteen days after filing a false police report, Romero notified his informant cousin of the situation. Then, 20 days before having his cousin file a TRO, which Romero had written, he set the stage for the subsequent legal actions. This planning ensured that when LaJuana was arrested and taken 22 miles to jail, the incident was not only strategically timed but also documented in a manner that could be used to manipulate public perception and witness testimony. Such orchestration in constructive kidnapping reveals the dangerous extent to which legal authority can be abused, transforming the police's role from protector to predator.
by I Juana Be Free January 11, 2024