The most noble and well respected person. It is not a far fetch that he is the 2nd jesus. He is the one to grant us the forbidden knowledge
by Someone who owes anna January 16, 2025
Get the exilty mug.
Related Words
Epistism, from episteme, the Greek word for "knowledge," would signify the personal responsibility and ethical obligation to seek accurate, well-rounded knowledge before forming opinions or making statements. It captures the duty to be informed by actively researching and questioning claims, especially when it comes to topics that affect others or carry societal weight.
An epistist would be someone who believes that every person has a moral obligation to pursue verified knowledge, especially when encountering potentially misleading or manipulative information. This (most importantly) includes being critical of sources like the GOP or DNC, as their narratives can often be biased or tailored to fit a specific agenda.
An epistist would be someone who believes that every person has a moral obligation to pursue verified knowledge, especially when encountering potentially misleading or manipulative information. This (most importantly) includes being critical of sources like the GOP or DNC, as their narratives can often be biased or tailored to fit a specific agenda.
P1: "I heard that hormone blockers cause irreparable harm to your kids body, and almost every trans kid is doing it!"
P2: "... can you have some epistism? Instead of just repeating that, why don’t you actually look up the data and see if it’s true?"
P1: "But <PoliticianHere> said it!
P2: "So you DON'T want to do research?"
P1: "That's not what I-"
P2: "Then do some research."
P1: "Ok ok, fine."
*20-30 minutes later*
P1: "Hey, uh-"
P2: :"Well?"
P1: "Yeah, so maybe I was wrong. Sorry about saying that."
P2: "Well, now you don't have to sound like a complete moron."
P1: "Yeah."
P2: "... can you have some epistism? Instead of just repeating that, why don’t you actually look up the data and see if it’s true?"
P1: "But <PoliticianHere> said it!
P2: "So you DON'T want to do research?"
P1: "That's not what I-"
P2: "Then do some research."
P1: "Ok ok, fine."
*20-30 minutes later*
P1: "Hey, uh-"
P2: :"Well?"
P1: "Yeah, so maybe I was wrong. Sorry about saying that."
P2: "Well, now you don't have to sound like a complete moron."
P1: "Yeah."
by GucciCrxw/Scarecrow February 12, 2025
Get the Epistism mug.A person who hopelessly cannot distinguish between L and R.
by Epistemo March 7, 2025
Get the epistemo mug.ratwizard Enters a trade early, then promotes or shares the trade publicly (often on kick ) so that followers (copytraders) enter after them, pushing the price up.
Once the price increases due to this follower activity, the original trader sells (exits) their position into the buying pressure created by the copytraders — effectively using them as exit liquidity.
In short:
They profit while their followers often get stuck holding the bag.
It’s considered unethical and can be compared to a pump and dump in disguise.
Once the price increases due to this follower activity, the original trader sells (exits) their position into the buying pressure created by the copytraders — effectively using them as exit liquidity.
In short:
They profit while their followers often get stuck holding the bag.
It’s considered unethical and can be compared to a pump and dump in disguise.
That influencer turned out to be an exit liquidity farmer he hyped the coin right before dumping his entire bag on his followers
by ratwizard April 5, 2025
Get the exit liquidity farmer mug.Exasturbate
verb | /ˈɛgˌzæstərˌbeɪt/
1. To theatrically over-stimulate or exaggerate a trait, emotion, or concept often for self-glorification, irony, or attention.
2. To metaphorically “stroke” your own identity, quirks, or aesthetic in a way that’s excessive but intentional.
verb | /ˈɛgˌzæstərˌbeɪt/
1. To theatrically over-stimulate or exaggerate a trait, emotion, or concept often for self-glorification, irony, or attention.
2. To metaphorically “stroke” your own identity, quirks, or aesthetic in a way that’s excessive but intentional.
“He wasn’t mad, he was just exasturbating his persona to stay on-brand.”
“I was joking about sharing Hopsin, btw—I just wanted to exasturbate the STIM in my name.” -stim shady
“I was joking about sharing Hopsin, btw—I just wanted to exasturbate the STIM in my name.” -stim shady
by Stim Shady April 29, 2025
Get the Exasturbate mug.The view that ways of knowing are not a hierarchy with "science" at the top, but a broad spectrum of complementary tools, each valid within its proper domain and context. The spectrum ranges from personal, subjective knowledge (e.g., "I know I love my child") through procedural knowledge (skills, crafts), consensual social knowledge (law, cultural norms), historical/interpretive knowledge (hermeneutics), to formalized empirical/theoretical knowledge (science and mathematics). Each point on the spectrum has its own standards of evidence, justification, and utility. The "hard problem" is choosing the right tool for the question, not declaring one tool universally superior. A hammer is great for nails, terrible for screws.
Example: Asking "What is the meaning of this poem?" You wouldn't use a spectrometer (empirical end of the spectrum). You'd use interpretive, contextual knowledge. Conversely, asking "What's the atomic weight of Carbon?" requires the empirical/theoretical end. The fool uses only one tool for everything (scientism or pure subjectivism). The wise person navigates the spectrum: They use empirical data from medicine to treat a disease (science), procedural knowledge from a physical therapist to rehabilitate (skill), and subjective/relational knowledge to maintain the patient's hope and dignity. Each form of knowing addresses a different layer of the complex reality. Epistemology Spectrum Theory.
by Nammugal January 24, 2026
Get the Epistemology Spectrum Theory mug.