david smith, jr.'s definitions
It doesn't matter if you're not a Batman fan, or a comic book fan for that matter. This is one of those movies that everyone must view at least once in their lifetime. The Dark Knight is the Citizen Kane and Godfather of this generation.
by david smith, jr. July 30, 2008
Get the The Dark Knight mug.I love it when Steeler's fans say Super Bowl XL was not fixed. Check out these stats:
Ben Roethlisberger: 9/21 (42%) 123 yards 0 touchdowns 2 interceptions 22 passer rating
Roethlisberger holds the title of having the absolute worst quarterback performance in Super Bowl history. He was even worse than Terry Bradshaw (who was never that good, despite what the media says) in his performance against the LA Rams in Super Bowl XIV. Don't even mention the phantom touchdown he didn't get. He even admitted on national television that he did not get that touchdown.
Willie Parker: 10 carries/93 yards.
On the surface, this is good. But one of his carries was a 75 yard touchdown, so if we take that away, his stats would've been 18 yards on 9 carries, or 2 yards a carry, which is extremely shitty.
Jerome Bettis: 14 carries, 43 yards
I've always hated that overrated fat fuck, and it was a pleasure seeing the Seahawks defense stuff his fatass. He only managed 3 yards a carry. It's also important to mention that Detroit, his home town, hosted Super Bowl XL, and he retired after finally getting his long awaited Super Bowl ring. Is anyone finding this a little coincidental?
The only player on the entire Steeler's team that played well was Hines Ward (123 yards, 5 receptions). Even if the Seahawks won, he would still deserve the MVP (and I fucking hate Hines Ward).
Take away the refs (one of them being a Pittsburgh native), the Seahawks would've destroyed the Steelers, possibly the first shutout in Super Bowl history.
Ben Roethlisberger: 9/21 (42%) 123 yards 0 touchdowns 2 interceptions 22 passer rating
Roethlisberger holds the title of having the absolute worst quarterback performance in Super Bowl history. He was even worse than Terry Bradshaw (who was never that good, despite what the media says) in his performance against the LA Rams in Super Bowl XIV. Don't even mention the phantom touchdown he didn't get. He even admitted on national television that he did not get that touchdown.
Willie Parker: 10 carries/93 yards.
On the surface, this is good. But one of his carries was a 75 yard touchdown, so if we take that away, his stats would've been 18 yards on 9 carries, or 2 yards a carry, which is extremely shitty.
Jerome Bettis: 14 carries, 43 yards
I've always hated that overrated fat fuck, and it was a pleasure seeing the Seahawks defense stuff his fatass. He only managed 3 yards a carry. It's also important to mention that Detroit, his home town, hosted Super Bowl XL, and he retired after finally getting his long awaited Super Bowl ring. Is anyone finding this a little coincidental?
The only player on the entire Steeler's team that played well was Hines Ward (123 yards, 5 receptions). Even if the Seahawks won, he would still deserve the MVP (and I fucking hate Hines Ward).
Take away the refs (one of them being a Pittsburgh native), the Seahawks would've destroyed the Steelers, possibly the first shutout in Super Bowl history.
For a full analysis of Super Bowl XL, please go to: http://www.lunaranomalies.com/XL-officiating.htm
by david smith, jr. January 17, 2009
Get the Super Bowl XL mug.Peyton Manning is the most overrated and overhyoed player...in the postseason.
Seriously, how did he get the MVP with these stats: 25/38 (65%, solid), 247 yards (average 6.5 yards a pass, bad), one touchdown (considering he's Peyton fucking Manning, you'd expect more, hell his brother had more touchdowns in his Super Bowl appearance, and Eli is terrible!), one interception, which equates into an 81.7. Normally, that's seen a just meh, but this is Peyton Manning we're talking about, so there's more weight.
Dominic Rhodes ran for 113 yards on 21 carries (5.3 yards a carry, on the Bears defense!) and touchdown, yet he didn't get the MVP?
Seriously, how did he get the MVP with these stats: 25/38 (65%, solid), 247 yards (average 6.5 yards a pass, bad), one touchdown (considering he's Peyton fucking Manning, you'd expect more, hell his brother had more touchdowns in his Super Bowl appearance, and Eli is terrible!), one interception, which equates into an 81.7. Normally, that's seen a just meh, but this is Peyton Manning we're talking about, so there's more weight.
Dominic Rhodes ran for 113 yards on 21 carries (5.3 yards a carry, on the Bears defense!) and touchdown, yet he didn't get the MVP?
Don't get me wrong, I was glad Peyton got his ring, since he deserved it. But his victory isn't as good as the media says.
Don't forget, he was playing against an incredibly overrated Bears team that was led by Rex Grossman. If you gave any team two weeks to prepare against that, they're going to crush them.
Overall rating for Super Bowl XLI: 3/10.
Pros:
-Peyton gets his ring
-Grossman gets raped
Cons:
-Peyton is one of, if not the, most undeserving MVP in Super Bowl history.
-Rain made the game sloppy.
-06-07 Bears are one of the worst teams to make the Super Bowl.
Don't forget, he was playing against an incredibly overrated Bears team that was led by Rex Grossman. If you gave any team two weeks to prepare against that, they're going to crush them.
Overall rating for Super Bowl XLI: 3/10.
Pros:
-Peyton gets his ring
-Grossman gets raped
Cons:
-Peyton is one of, if not the, most undeserving MVP in Super Bowl history.
-Rain made the game sloppy.
-06-07 Bears are one of the worst teams to make the Super Bowl.
by david smith, jr. January 29, 2009
Get the Super Bowl XLI mug.Favre, his fans, and the media can eat their shit now.
Aaron Rodgers: 341/536 (63.6%), 4,308 yards (7.53 yards), longest 71, 28 touchdowns, 13 interceptions, sacked 34 times, 93.8 passer rating.
Notes: The Packers defense was terrible this year, their o-line not performing well, Ryan Grant struggled, and Greg Jennings/Donald Driver are nowhere near as good as Laveranues Coles and Jerricho Cotchery.
Brett Favre: 343/522 (65.7%), 3,472 (6.65 yards), longest 56, 22 touchdowns, 22 interceptions, sacked 30 times, 81 passer rating.
Notes: Granted Favre had a better completion percentage, his total and average passing yards is noticeably lower than Rodgers (and Favre had a better wide receivers unit). Favre had less touchdowns than Rodgers and more interceptions.
Packers Nation, stop blaming Rodgers for the poor season. If the Packers improve their defense in the offseason, they're going to be the team to watch out for.
Aaron Rodgers: 341/536 (63.6%), 4,308 yards (7.53 yards), longest 71, 28 touchdowns, 13 interceptions, sacked 34 times, 93.8 passer rating.
Notes: The Packers defense was terrible this year, their o-line not performing well, Ryan Grant struggled, and Greg Jennings/Donald Driver are nowhere near as good as Laveranues Coles and Jerricho Cotchery.
Brett Favre: 343/522 (65.7%), 3,472 (6.65 yards), longest 56, 22 touchdowns, 22 interceptions, sacked 30 times, 81 passer rating.
Notes: Granted Favre had a better completion percentage, his total and average passing yards is noticeably lower than Rodgers (and Favre had a better wide receivers unit). Favre had less touchdowns than Rodgers and more interceptions.
Packers Nation, stop blaming Rodgers for the poor season. If the Packers improve their defense in the offseason, they're going to be the team to watch out for.
by david smith, jr. February 5, 2009
Get the Aaron Rodgers mug.