Definitions by Hym Iam
Demi Minor
Hym "Interesting fact of the day! (And this one's for Megyn) Demi Minor, DIDN'T ACTUALLY RAPE ANYONE. Demi Minor was in a consensual relationship with one of the other inmates. THEN, a 2nd inmate USED THE THREAT OF VIOLENCE against the 1st inmate (who was in a relationship with Demi) to coerce Demi into having relations with her. So what happened was: THE TRANS WOMAN WAS RAPED BY THE NOT-TRANS WOMAN! THAT'S WHAT HAPPENED THERE! The only people who are getting raped in women's prison by not-guards... Are the TRANS-WOMEN! The TRANS got raped by the NOT trans. That's what happened there."
Demi Minor by Hym Iam September 24, 2023
Risk
William Christopherson "Why aren't men walking in to that wall!? It's almost like... Their avoiding the risk commonly associated with walking to walls... 🤔 Hmmm.... What could it POSSIBLY be!?"
Hym "I mean... There's not a door there. The selection criteria is what determines whether or not there's a door and there's not a door there for 80% of the people. What you're doing is tantamount to trying to figure out a way to get men to walk into a wall repeatedly in the hopes that quantum mechanics will kick in and eventually and allow them to pass through the wall. Like... They're not that stupid. No one is that stupid."
Hym "I mean... There's not a door there. The selection criteria is what determines whether or not there's a door and there's not a door there for 80% of the people. What you're doing is tantamount to trying to figure out a way to get men to walk into a wall repeatedly in the hopes that quantum mechanics will kick in and eventually and allow them to pass through the wall. Like... They're not that stupid. No one is that stupid."
Rat king
No Cody, you idiot, he's referring to an ACTUAL EXPERIMENT done with rats (Studying social hierarchies across time) where THAT actually happened. I can't remember the name of the experiment but the IS, in fact, a thing that happened and was done to rats. You can probably find the experiment on YouTube. That's where I saw it.
Theology
Yeah, that's a pretty egregious conflation of ontology and theology.
Hym "Yeah, see... My problem with theology is that it posits the assertion that life is a morality test designed by a guy... Who gave us the answers TO the test... And now all we have to do is use the answers he gave us... TO the test HE GAVE US... So that it doesn't have to burn us forever... For not using the correct answers... That he gave us 2000 years ago... In an act of DIRECT DIALOGUE...
Hym "Yeah, see... My problem with theology is that it posits the assertion that life is a morality test designed by a guy... Who gave us the answers TO the test... And now all we have to do is use the answers he gave us... TO the test HE GAVE US... So that it doesn't have to burn us forever... For not using the correct answers... That he gave us 2000 years ago... In an act of DIRECT DIALOGUE...
With a guy who died 2000 years ago... And this guy is the last and ONLY guy to have ever spoken to it... But I also shouldn't worry about it... Because I am inherently guilty... While SIMULTANEOUSLY preemptively forgiven... And that means NOT that I won't be burned forever... But that it wasn't going to forgive the inherent guilt (at first)... But NOW it IS going to do that... So, I WAS going to burn forever initially... But it changed it's mind... And now... As long as I just shut up and use the test answers I was given... It won't burn me forever... Instead of the thing it was GOING to burn me forever for... Initially... The inherent guilt I mean... Which is not a thing I ACTUALLY DID... But a thing some dumb bitch who doesn't do what she's told did... And her doing THAT is somehow cosmicly makes ME guilty of the thing SHE did... But not anymore because we murdered the test-guy... Which is what we were supposed to do... As part of the test... And I also have to do weird breeding rituals... And the guy gets to murder me once and how well I receive it determines whether or not I'm burned alive forever. It deliberately wastes .0000-01 of an eternity that you will never get back and then it sends a semi-sentient teeth torpedo at you and shreds the flesh from your skeleton. And this is what I should both serve and worship. That's your theology."
Strawman
That isn't my claim though is it? My claim a that you're a women-worshipping fat fucking hairy dungeon gnome who's resigned himself to inferiority so readily that even the prospect that women aren't walking, sentient fucking virtue detectors is an unacceptable affront to the life to which you've resigned yourself. No amount of effort is going to make you better than me and any more effort than I currently expend would make ME Andrew Tate. And you fucking hate him too. Fuck all the women. Use the fact that you're able to fuck all of the women... To exploit the women... BY exploiting the incels. They deserve it for giving him their money. But you don't want to have to be inferior to HIM while simultaneously DESPERATELY DEMANDING I accept equality or even inferiority to a fucking retard. So what do you do? Whip out your no true scottsman fallacy 'You shouldn't want to be like Andrew tate. You should want to be like ME! They guy who relishes at the prospect of being inferior to a retard.' So you can roll around with all of the other undesirables and lie to yourself. 'At least I don't have to be worse than Hym! Even if I was I'd just make some shit up like I do with Tate.' Your only redeeming quality some amorphous, unqualifiable, contribution that amounts to little more than laundering you receive AS CHARITY, TO A DIFFERENT CHARITY. And even if you COULD quantify it, and you COULD make it more concrete, it would STILL add up to LESS than HIS contribution.
Hym "That's a strawman. And, BEYOND that, HIS contribution is a peripheral element of MY FUCKING CONTRIBUTION. It's Record of Ragnarok. You'd rather die than have humanity be saved by Jack the Ripper. Not that I am at all like Jack the ripper but I'm sure you get the point. It's pathetic. It so important for you to reinforce the notion that those who are unsuccessful with women are deserve the hate they get. 'Everyone I hate deserves the hate they receive and I'm the self-appointed arbiter of who people are not allowed to hate.' Women don't ever deserve the hate they receive. Incels do. Why? 'Because women validate me sometimes and if it doesn't make me special I don't have anyone to be better than.' No matter how meager or remedial your existence, you entire life is just one long sigh of relief that you don't have to be the piss-freak. And bulding relationships doesn't translate to success with women. Potential success with women is just the golden carrot hung out to motivate the unclean to work hard and be friendly to women. Perpetual false hope for some offered by a flippant and indifferent God."