Yeah that's definitely me and not the weaponized schizophrenia. I'm not being collectively shunned or anything I just fucking talk good because I'M the autist. And I'm obviously being sarcastic.
Hym "Yeah, it seems like I am everything I say about other people! Not because I actually am those things but because if you actually gave me the credit I was do I WOULD BE BETTER THAN PIECE OF SHIT YOUTUBE VERMIN! It's weird isn't it? That espousing YouTube default somehow makes you 'The Improved Man.' And by virtue of BEING 'The Improved Man you're deserving now of association and success... But ONLY if you've been anointed by a status-man and a priestess."
by Hym Iam May 04, 2024
Hym "And now you're trying to frame weird as some kind of profound political stratagem. It's the same thing you're doing with 'brat.' One word thematic representations that are entirely arbitrarily assigned. You're... Dumb. You're so fucking dumb pfftthahahaha!"
by Hym Iam August 02, 2024
See? Now they are doing it too. Now you have both sides of the political idle talking about how weird the vice presidents are one either side.
Hym "Neither of them are weird you're all fundamentally bad people who need to get your kids murdered. Dead kids is the only thing capable of fixing any of you. That and the death of despair that would hopefully follow. It isn't me watching your channel. Unsubscribing doesn't fix the problem. The only thing that fix the problem is you ceasing to exist. All of you. I'm going to do it soon and I'm going to take ass many of you with me as possible. And others will draw the same conclusion and they will never stop drawing the same conclusion be YOU ARE THE REASON they do it. Murder as many kids as you can. Kill yourself. It's the only way."
by Hym Iam July 30, 2024
Not normal.
Iam "That's the weird thing about all this... I don't explicitly think that the things I'm watching have some sort of hidden meaning or message for me or anything. It's exclusively people I interact with. So, here's an example: I've been watching that comedy show for years. Never once did I think they were making a direct reference to me save for 1 instance where one of the guys said a woman was "A walking hole to fill." Which was hilarious and a thing that I wrote. But I was like 'Ok. Maybe he read that or maybe he came up with the same idea.' and that's fair enough, right? But that's the only time.
Iam "That's the weird thing about all this... I don't explicitly think that the things I'm watching have some sort of hidden meaning or message for me or anything. It's exclusively people I interact with. So, here's an example: I've been watching that comedy show for years. Never once did I think they were making a direct reference to me save for 1 instance where one of the guys said a woman was "A walking hole to fill." Which was hilarious and a thing that I wrote. But I was like 'Ok. Maybe he read that or maybe he came up with the same idea.' and that's fair enough, right? But that's the only time.
Until after your little 'slip.' Now I see it regularly. I say the Brit is a 'clever guy' for using that quote; the guy interviewing him calls him a 'clever guy' the day after I write it. The same guy parrots my description (verbatim) of my character. Before all that, he parrots (again verbatim) my reasoning for writing in the first place (because, initially, this started as a compilation of information that I thought was interesting or worth spreading). You were sitting right there when he said it. If you watched him do what I think he did and you are aware of it; then it isn't Schizophrenia. You're doing the thing that I believe people are doing. I find it increasingly difficult to write off these occurrences as mere coincidence. Three separate occasion. So, as an experiment, I subscribed to a new channel. I didn't think I was being referenced at all and he's in the same sphere as you (technically). I go and watch a video of the first person I subscribed to. No feeling that I am being referenced. I've outlined all of the reason I might have earned someone's ire. I proved that the people at my last job were reading my writing by correcting the spelling of a word she misspelled repeatedly. She spelled it correctly from that day on. So, yeah, good question. Why some things and not others? Because some people are doing the thing I'm talking about and other people are not. It's weird."
by Hym Iam May 27, 2022
Hym "Right! The nanobots! Did I get my nanobots all up in your brains yet or no? Sad Dad said something about all of the women orgasming at the same time... And that sounds like something I would do... Did I get my nanobots all up in you mind-brains yet? No? Yes? Let me know, alright? I need to get those motherfuckers up in there."
by Hym Iam December 24, 2023
Hym "A strong sense of (personal) justice is a trait of autism. I saw this in a YouTube video by... Kaelynism? Something like that... Which means I am... CORRECT AGAIN! The political landscape is just Austists vs Schizos!"
Autist "The numbers don't match! All the rates should match with all the other rates! Cops shouldn't exist but you should get arrested for being a RACIST!"
Schizo "They're persecuting me! They're persecuting me because I love Jesus too hard! Don't you see!? God told me that you have to do whatever I say forever... And IF YOU DON'T... Well, I just get to do whatever I want, don't I!? Heheheh...."
Autist "The numbers don't match! All the rates should match with all the other rates! Cops shouldn't exist but you should get arrested for being a RACIST!"
Schizo "They're persecuting me! They're persecuting me because I love Jesus too hard! Don't you see!? God told me that you have to do whatever I say forever... And IF YOU DON'T... Well, I just get to do whatever I want, don't I!? Heheheh...."
by Hym Iam June 25, 2024
To say that DEI is "equality of outcome" is 1. To create an implicit false dichotomy between 'Equality of outcome' and 'Meritocracy' and 2. Presupposes that the latter is what is currently occurring.
Hym "Equality of outcome is a 'NOT A REAL DOCTOR' being elevated to the STATUS of DOCTOR by A TALK SHOW HOST. Right? The claim is 'If we do DEI, people will achieve an undeserved outcome at the cost of the meritorious' but the statement presupposes that MERIT BASED HIRING is what is occurring and ignores entirely that outcomes are ALSO mediated by CRONYISM and NEPOTISM. So, my question to Dr. RAPE-FARM is... If DEI is wrong being Equality of outcome leads meritorious people to miss out on opportunities they deserve more than the people being elevated... How is Nepotism any different? Is it just a coincidence? That the child of the business owner is just the super-duper most bestest employee who workered his way up from the bottom like a real boy OR did the PARENT... EQUALIZE THEIR KIDS OUTCOME AT THE COST OF EVERYONE ELSE? And how is it not wrong for the same reason?
by Hym Iam April 30, 2024