1) Lets compare macintosh to an airline:

All the stewards, captains, baggage handlers, and ticket agents look and act exactly the same. Every time you ask questions about details, you are gently but firmly told that you don't need to know, don't want to know, and everything will be done for you without your ever having to know, so just shut up.

2) Here are some comments on one of the entries speaking in defence of macs:

"You may have used Macs at some point in your lifetime, doesn't mean you know everything about them. Stop spreading BS."

I probably know more than you, even though I use Windows:

Most software that is developed for Macintosh (other than the {shitty} OS itself) is written using Microsoft Visual C++ Cross-Platform Development Edition. Guess what? VC++CPE runs on WINDOWS ONLY! In other words, macintosh is the WORST choice for programmers/developers such as myself. kthx

""Adobe abandoned them" Yes, that's why they still actively develop Mac apps. What a steel trap mind you've got!!"

They still develop Mac apps, true, but guess what they use to develop them? Microsoft Visual C++ Cross-platform Development edition! (see what I mentioned about VC++ above)

"" that cant run any good programs." Macs started the desktop publishing revolution, were the first computers to run Excel natively, were the first computers to run Photoshop natively ... the list goes on and on."

But can they run command-line tools like most other OS's like Windows, Linux, etc??????????? NO. Granted using a GUI (Graphical User Interface) program is easier but command-line programs tend to be faster, smaller, less runtimes, etc. And if you weren't a complete retard then you wouldnt have any problem whatsoever using a command-line tool/program.

"D. They aren't paperweights. I'm using a Mac right now damnit. Anyone with HALF A FUCKING BRAIN knows that Macs are useful. Your little Windows mags even use Macs in their art department. Mhm, that's right."
Hmm... you know what was probably used to develop the Macintosh painting thing or w/e its called? microsoft visual c++ cross-platform development edition. (See what I mentioned about that earlier in this entry.) Get that fact into your thick skull, k?
To sum it up,

Windows > Macintosh
All other OS's > Macintosh

1. An expensive chunk of shiny metal and plastic.
2. An expensive paperweight
You paid $3000 for a Macintosh? I built a PC for $800 that can kick its ass and it STILL looks better.
by mikm June 11, 2005
Macintosh was made by someone who thought they were very cool, but unfortunately made a pretty crap OS that cant run any good programs.
-Dosent work properly
by peeeee March 19, 2005
a piece of shit computer that is not compatible with most games.
lol look at john trying to download that mmorpg on a macintosh/mac its not compatabe, what a fool
by josh bernard November 04, 2006
an alternative os which is less compatable than my calculator.
my mac ;loving freind cant even name 10 good free programs
its like a supercar, it can go at 400km/h but only on 0.5% of the world
by Kip June 05, 2005
A branded, overpriced PC for self-absorbed children.
I feel like paying triple the price for half the performance in my new computer. Also, I can barely operate one. Guess I'll get a Macintosh!
by Shittyhorse May 26, 2011
Computers for people who do not understand computing.

An expensive brand of computers with proprietary hardware and software, which is incompatible with almost everything that is not made by Apple.

Apple's marketing relies heavily on claiming superiority over non Apple computers.
A macintosh is not the Ferrari of the computer world, it is the lamborghini.

Sure its pretty and stupidly expensive, but it can't perform at the track like a real performance car (computer).
by Jackofallfades September 14, 2010
A very controversial platform introduced by Apple back in '85. Some love it, most hate it. The general consensus is that you can't do ANYTHING with them. I'll admit outright that a factory shipped apple computer lacks the ability to run games. But for those who don't play games, it's not a loss. And the platforms secure Unix core and lack of popularity make it a rare target for hackers and viruses. Not to mention that the previous PowerPC based generations were true monsters. The RISC based computers were oh so easy to program. And reached real world results that are hard to achieve on the x86 platform. Needless to say, my respect for that platform dropped exponentially since the advent of Intel based Macs. But the simple intuitive GUI makes up for the hardware drawback. It's Unix roots hold several advantages over other Os's on the market. If anything, the lack of a registry and no Dll's are the Unix system's biggest forte. All I can say, is that I've been using my 68k based Mac Plus, PowerPC based Powerbook 1400c, Power Mac G4 and Powerbook G4 happily for years. I do own a PC, but it's pretty pokey sometimes and has to be whiped clean every year. When I need a huge library of programs, than i'll whip out my Hp Mini, for something zippy and simple, my Macintoshs reign supreme. It's all a matter of what you want to do.
PowerPC Macintosh computers= Fast, simple.

x86= Far more common, overly complex, once used Netburst, and that's bad enough.
by Medicus April 27, 2010
Free Daily Email

Type your email address below to get our free Urban Word of the Day every morning!

Emails are sent from daily@urbandictionary.com. We'll never spam you.