1. U.inversity of

2. perhaps the most overated football team of all time, that escaped being destroyed by LSU (the real 2003 NATIONAL CHAMPS, greatest school for parties, academics and sports) in 2003 and escaped being beat by Auburn (school of douches) in 2004

3. school of generally consisting of whores and skanks that feed off of their parents money

4. an all round shithole located in L.A.
USC is know throughout the land for sucking cock and being the WORLD'S BIGGEST DOUCHES.
by USC BLOWS ASS August 08, 2005
University of Spoiled Children
yeah, that's guy's a DK, he's going to USC.
by la unica July 05, 2005
see ripoff

When it comes to colleges, being private usually means being better. This is not the case when it comes to USC, which has lower academic rankings in comparison to both UCLA and Cal. With USC, being private simply means that it costs more.

Some people call USC the "university of spoiled children." This is wrong. USC students are ripped off. In comparison, UCLA students pay a fraction of the price USC charges and they get to go to a school with better academic rankings with better faculty in a much better neighborhood. Who's spoiled again? UCLA students are.

I feel sorry for Trojans. I really do. I hope you can find a way to justify USC stealing all that money from you.
Unless you want to play football, go to UCLA. Don't fall victim to the ripoff machine at USC. It will just make you bitter and delusional.
by ARealSpoiledChild March 12, 2005
USC is no longer the University of Second Choice. They are just the Ugly Sluts College now. The only thing to be proud of at SC is OJ Simpson, drive by shootings, an overpriced... umm, well, it's not exactly education, and lots and lots of ugly kids. Football... that's the only positive aspect. Cheer for them if you wanna dress up in ketchup and mustard.
You can't spell SUCK without USC.
by Eaz October 14, 2005
USC is the University of South Carolina...yes the original USC. everyone knows that u gotta have the cock before you got the trojan....go gamecocks
USC rocks! go gamecocks!
by gamecock girl! March 15, 2005
Every year, the London Times ranks the best colleges in the world. In the most recent edition of the Times Higher Education Supplement, UCLA was ranked number 26 in the world. Cal was ranked number 2 in the world. Stanford was ranked number 7. Where do you think USC was ranked in the world?

USC was ranked number 180 in the world by the London Times! I guess your entrance requirements aren't helping you much.

US News had UCLA ranked at number 25, Cal ranked at number 21, and USC ranked at number 30 for this year. That's because they consider the amount of money alumni give to each school. Of course private schools like USC will have inflated rankings in the US News guide. And even with that, UCLA is ranked higher in the US News list.

Let's see here...UCLA-26, USC-180...USC better in academics? Please!

It's a known fact that UCLA looks at more than just your scores when selecting students. Ask anybody who's been turned down by the school. You need extracurricular activities as well as high gpa and SAT scores.

And to the moron who talked about not paying $30,000 a year, if you are getting that money in loans, you will be paying it sooner or later. Maybe they didn't teach you that in South Central. I hope the Trojan alumni give you a nice job.
Do you see the London Times college rankings? UCLA was ranked 26 and USC was ranked 180. I thought USC was a good school. Oh well.
by Trojankiller December 22, 2004
Free Daily Email

Type your email address below to get our free Urban Word of the Day every morning!

Emails are sent from We'll never spam you.