A metascientific framework, often drawing on Marxist terminology, that examines the ideological, cultural, and discursive formations that arise from and legitimize the material
infrastructure of science. The superstructure of science includes the belief systems, values, narratives, and ideologies that science produces and that in turn shape how science is
understood and practiced—the idea of scientific progress, the myth of the lone genius, the ideology of value-free inquiry, the narrative of science as salvation, the cultural authority of experts, the distinction between science and pseudoscience as a boundary-making practice. It also includes the ways scientific knowledge is represented in popular culture, education, and policy—the stories we tell about science that shape what science means and who gets to
participate. Examining the superstructure reveals that science is not just a knowledge-producing machine but a cultural formation, producing meaning and legitimacy alongside facts, and that this cultural dimension shapes scientific practice as surely as funding or equipment.
Example: "His superstructure of science analysis showed how the 'scientific method' taught in schools is largely a myth—a simplified story that legitimizes science by making it seem
systematic and
objective, while hiding the messy, creative, social reality of actual
scientific practice."