a very dedicated person who works their ass off to capture the school year in 300 pages. someone who should be respected bc he or she can and will put bad pictures of you in the yearbook if you give him or her any shit about last years yearbook or if he or she just hates you.
by deshawna July 6, 2006
Internet users of questionable intelligence, who have the habit of rejecting completely legitimate definitions while accepting nonsense.
I signed up to be one of the urbandictionary editors but quickly ignored the job when I felt my IQ dropping by the second.
by MC Fred July 13, 2006
A person on Instagram who claims to be an editor but doesn’t add any transitions, effects, colorings, or any retouching of the sort to their clips. Their edits get thousands of views and are very overrated compared to edits that people have actually put effort into. You will most likely see them editing Mia Wallace from Pulp Fiction or Cher Horowitz from Clueless. They won’t edit photos because it would be obvious it’s a slideshow. They are basically the “I’m not like the other girls” of editing.
“I am not a slideshow editor! I just like to make my edits simple! Anyways, what song should I use for my Mia Wallace edit, ‘You Know How We Do It’ or “Chamber of Reflections’?”
by moldytoast September 27, 2019
The annoying plebs probably stuck at home with coronavirus on Urban Dictionary that WILL NOT ACCEPT MY SUBMISSIONS.
Volunteer Editors: Oh look, a perfectly good urban dictionary submission that is 10x better than half of the words on this website.
Volunteer Editors: *click no*
Me: WHYYYYYY
Volunteer Editors: *click no*
Me: WHYYYYYY
by nnnnnnnn8 April 7, 2020
1) A troup of anonymous dodo birds with the IQ of 3, who always reject the proper definitions, and let the abbusive and ignorant definitions be put onto the website.
2) Total bird-brained people who keep rejecting my definitions.
3) This definition would probably be rejected by them, as well
4) Constantly keep their mouse arrow hoovered on top of any definition, to immediatley reject it.
2) Total bird-brained people who keep rejecting my definitions.
3) This definition would probably be rejected by them, as well
4) Constantly keep their mouse arrow hoovered on top of any definition, to immediatley reject it.
by Hjselfieco January 28, 2015
1) A group of more-or-less anonymous people who are pretty much the only line of defense for this site to prevent it from being totally abused. They are pretty much the only thing between you and about 50 million explicit, pornographic, abusive, misogynistic, racist, or just plain stupid entries.
Editors have specific guidelines they must follow. However, these are often vague (especially if it's hard to tell, for example, if a term is just explaining a racial slur, or if it is in fact racist).
If your definition doesn't get published, it could be for one of two reasons:
A) It wasn't that good or
B) Someone just didn't like it for some reason.
In that case, try again...
However, bitching about them probably won't help.
Editors have specific guidelines they must follow. However, these are often vague (especially if it's hard to tell, for example, if a term is just explaining a racial slur, or if it is in fact racist).
If your definition doesn't get published, it could be for one of two reasons:
A) It wasn't that good or
B) Someone just didn't like it for some reason.
In that case, try again...
However, bitching about them probably won't help.
1)Person: "OMG! Those evil facist urbandictionary editors rejected my entry! They suck!!!!"
Other person: "Get a life."
Other person: "Get a life."
by andriod5 March 25, 2006
If you're reading this, someone from Urban Dictionary did something wrong and something that shouldn't have been deleted got deleted.
Whoops.
Whoops.
Clicking on the link in editor/remove.php shouldn't bring you here, but it does. Because bugs I guess.
"Wait, you're seeing editor/remove.form.php? Tell one of the admins to fix that."
"Wait, you're seeing editor/remove.form.php? Tell one of the admins to fix that."
by /b/leach_my_eyes April 26, 2021