by King Masterlord October 18, 2009
Verb - To kill for the purpose of removing said object from the gene pool. The individuals to whom this verb is applied should not, in the speaker's eyes, be allowed to reproduce and pass along their genes. Note: it is a purely humorous word, no one is actually supporting violence upon other human beings.
The word stems from a reference to Charles Darwin who first suggested natural selection as a primary method of evolution.
The word stems from a reference to Charles Darwin who first suggested natural selection as a primary method of evolution.
1. I can't believe that kid is playing in traffic, he should be darwined.
2. Jeff is such a moron he should be darwined so he doesn't pass along stupid genes.
2. Jeff is such a moron he should be darwined so he doesn't pass along stupid genes.
by WP Native January 25, 2009
darwin, charles was a alcoholic man with suicide inclinations, a huge white barb and a amateur interest for the nature. Inspired by his 33th grade freemason grandfather, erasmus darwin, the absurd theories of malthus and other primitive inanities, he considered his theory of evolution, by natural selection, which is scientifically collapsed today. (But with a simple research, you can find some idiots who still do believe in darwinism: dawkins, stephen jay gould, douglas futuyma, ...
The man who floored the theory of evolution is Harun Yahya
The man who floored the theory of evolution is Harun Yahya
This "theory of evolution by natural selection" gave rise to doubts from the very first:
1- What were the "natural and coincidental variations" referred to by Darwin? It was true that some cows were bigger than others, while some had darker colors, yet how could these variations provide an explanation for the diversity in animal and plant species?
2- Darwin asserted that "Living beings evolved gradually." In this case, there should have lived millions of "transitional forms." Yet there was no trace of these theoretical creatures in the fossil record. Darwin gave considerable thought to this problem, and eventually arrived at the conclusion that "further research would provide these fossils."
3- How could natural selection explain complex organs, such as eyes, ears or wings? How can it be advocated that these organs evolved gradually, bearing in mind that they would fail to function if they had even a single part missing?
4- Before considering these questions, consider the following: How did the first organism, the so-called ancestor of all species according to Darwin, come into existence? Could natural processes give life to something which was originally inanimate?
Darwin was, at least, aware of some these questions, as can be seen from the chapter "Difficulties of the Theory." However, the answers he provided had no scientific validity. H.S. Lipson, a British physicist, makes the following comments about these "difficulties" of Darwin's:
On reading The Origin of Species, I found that Darwin was much less sure himself than he is often represented to be; the chapter entitled "Difficulties on Theory" for example, shows considerable self-doubt. As a physicist, I was particularly intrigued by his comments on how the eye would have arisen.1
Darwin invested all his hopes in advanced scientific research, which he expected to dispel the "difficulties of the theory." However, contrary to his expectations, more recent scientific findings have merely increased these difficulties.
1- What were the "natural and coincidental variations" referred to by Darwin? It was true that some cows were bigger than others, while some had darker colors, yet how could these variations provide an explanation for the diversity in animal and plant species?
2- Darwin asserted that "Living beings evolved gradually." In this case, there should have lived millions of "transitional forms." Yet there was no trace of these theoretical creatures in the fossil record. Darwin gave considerable thought to this problem, and eventually arrived at the conclusion that "further research would provide these fossils."
3- How could natural selection explain complex organs, such as eyes, ears or wings? How can it be advocated that these organs evolved gradually, bearing in mind that they would fail to function if they had even a single part missing?
4- Before considering these questions, consider the following: How did the first organism, the so-called ancestor of all species according to Darwin, come into existence? Could natural processes give life to something which was originally inanimate?
Darwin was, at least, aware of some these questions, as can be seen from the chapter "Difficulties of the Theory." However, the answers he provided had no scientific validity. H.S. Lipson, a British physicist, makes the following comments about these "difficulties" of Darwin's:
On reading The Origin of Species, I found that Darwin was much less sure himself than he is often represented to be; the chapter entitled "Difficulties on Theory" for example, shows considerable self-doubt. As a physicist, I was particularly intrigued by his comments on how the eye would have arisen.1
Darwin invested all his hopes in advanced scientific research, which he expected to dispel the "difficulties of the theory." However, contrary to his expectations, more recent scientific findings have merely increased these difficulties.
by darwinism refuted April 14, 2009
Common slang for a ten pound note (english sterling). The term 'Darwin' denotes the value of the note because of the use of Charles Darwin's face on the reverse of the bank note.
Other amounts in note form are characterised by the face used on the reverse of the note, e.g. a 'Smith', used instead of saying 'twenty pounds', because of the use of Adam Smith's face.
Other amounts in note form are characterised by the face used on the reverse of the note, e.g. a 'Smith', used instead of saying 'twenty pounds', because of the use of Adam Smith's face.
i) Aeneas: Bruv, can you like skeck me a darwin please?
Len: I s'pose, what happened to your cash though?
Aeneas: Oh, these trousers have massive pockets so the Smith I had fell out
Len: Bummer.
ii) That old lady I mugged 'ad like a 'uge wad of Darwins. Must a've bin like penison day or summat.
Len: I s'pose, what happened to your cash though?
Aeneas: Oh, these trousers have massive pockets so the Smith I had fell out
Len: Bummer.
ii) That old lady I mugged 'ad like a 'uge wad of Darwins. Must a've bin like penison day or summat.
by Aeneas Edward December 1, 2007
by TAlyna February 1, 2018
Darwin's are try hards and think that they are all that. Darwin's are also people that are usually of little talent who tries hard. Most Darwin's also like to play soccer and think that there the best player in the world and think there going to be a professional soccer player but will most likely not make it in the professional level and would be at a very low level. Most Darwin's are also cry baby's and will whine for every little thing. Darwin's are also very lazy and will make stupid desions so his friends will have to help him. Most Darwin's are also very unintelligent. This is my definition on how many Darwin's I've meet so far.
by Darwin sucks March 13, 2019
HE looks like a Darwin.
by Hi8 April 30, 2019