Inter-subjectively
Hym "I really don't think that's the issue. I think when I say 'God is Evil' you hear 2+2=5. So, 2+2=4 does not=2+2=4. Unless... Do you think whether or not God is good is subjective? Either subjective or objective. If it's objective, it's either objectively good or it's objectively evil. If so, which is it? O'Connor let's it. And that's the problem with the online discourse. You're allowed to say 2+2=5 all you want but you aren't allowed to BE Nick Fuentes or 👉 Let me ask you this: How is what Nick Fuentes believes any different from someone who believes in Sharia law? He's a theocract. So he believes the state should be controlled by the religion (which is what Shraria). Whay else? The women have a role? Anti-Lgbt? Your protestations about him (and me) being in public entirely validates their 'Islamophobia.' The can just transpose his beliefs onto the believes of the Muslims and say 'This guy believes what they believe and even THEY don't want them here!'
Hym "I really don't think that's the issue. I think when I say 'God is Evil' you hear 2+2=5. So, 2+2=4 does not=2+2=4. Unless... Do you think whether or not God is good is subjective? Either subjective or objective. If it's objective, it's either objectively good or it's objectively evil. If so, which is it? O'Connor let's it. And that's the problem with the online discourse. You're allowed to say 2+2=5 all you want but you aren't allowed to BE Nick Fuentes or 👉 Let me ask you this: How is what Nick Fuentes believes any different from someone who believes in Sharia law? He's a theocract. So he believes the state should be controlled by the religion (which is what Shraria). Whay else? The women have a role? Anti-Lgbt? Your protestations about him (and me) being in public entirely validates their 'Islamophobia.' The can just transpose his beliefs onto the believes of the Muslims and say 'This guy believes what they believe and even THEY don't want them here!'
And you give them an excuse to be dismissive and ignore you on the topic. Which is what they're doing. And you can probably broaden that and say they can transpose THAT onto the the Palestinians and THAT justifies them being dismissive about the protests! And THAT is where the 'If those protesters when to Gaza... (They would get thrown off a roof for being gay or something being the insinuation)' rhetoric comes from. All justified by you without you realizing it. That's why they use the plants. That's the point of doing it. They set you up to approve of 'Islamophobia' by boosting a guy with a Quasi-Sharia interpretation of the religion. they watch you justify excising him from society, you say 'It's not the religion it's the fundamentalism', and then they can internalize that and say 'The fundamentalism is why I'm doing this!' I mean, you're like God's bipolar girlfriend. 'StoOoOop! You're hurting him!' But the bombs keep falling. They'll ignore you and just keep doing whatever they're doing all justified by your own manufactured consent. It's the conservative rhetoric not dismissive? But I digress... The idea that 2+2=4 does not=2+2=4 (inter-subjectively) speaks to a broader point about how people justify behavior or decision and what people accept as true. I could even go further and say it speaks to how people justify 'Evil.' But I'll have to get into that later."
by Hym Iam May 31, 2024
Get the 2+2=4 does not=2+2=4mug. The John Doe also knows as Johnathan Doesive was the boy that lost to Luisangel Tapia in chess to the Jeck-Mate. The John Doe made a life changing bet with Luisangel Tapia, the bet stated that if The John Doe won Luisangel Tapia would grant The John Doe three wishes, but if Luisangel Tapia won The John Doe would become Luisangel Tapia's minion for his entire life with the ability to duplicate The John Doe one billion times per epoch. The John Doe lost the chess match and became Luisangel's Minion.
"The John Doe is such a little baby bitch"
"For real though, how he gonna lose to Luisangel Tapia in chess"
"For real though, how he gonna lose to Luisangel Tapia in chess"
by Luisangel Lorester January 12, 2022
Get the The John Doemug. by Itsyaboialia November 10, 2020
Get the Does Remus know da waemug. “Doe” slang or replacement for the words wrong/mistake/fake etc.
Also a word for something that is untrue or non exsistant.
Also a word for something that is untrue or non exsistant.
by urban wizard1073 October 10, 2018
Get the Doemug. The question that has questionned the chess world, asked by Andrea Botez to Magnus Carlsen in the FIDE world championship 2021.
Andrea Botez: I've been dying to ask you, how does the knight move?
Magnus Carlsen: *laughs* That's a good question, it generally moves like an L and sometimes in blitz games it can be very unpredictable.
Andrea Botez: Thank you Magnus only you can answer my question.
Magnus Carlsen: *laughs* That's a good question, it generally moves like an L and sometimes in blitz games it can be very unpredictable.
Andrea Botez: Thank you Magnus only you can answer my question.
by ILikeChess July 21, 2023
Get the How does the knight move?mug. Machine with no use, this machine does nothing, and is often used at midnight when the cool breeze form the perfect conditions for a moth party
by John Deere 9860 STS combine October 28, 2021
Get the Machine that does nothingmug. no
by owie my bones no dude owie ow August 24, 2020
Get the does it get bettermug.