.
by SuelTameOresuTeMato February 22, 2025
Get the 《¤》Abolish《¤》abolish《¤》abolisH《¤》 mug.
Related Words
Abiola
• abiol
• abiology
• absolute unit
• Absolute
• abilene
• abibliophobia
• Abiel
• abil
• abilas
Definition:
Spiritual Abolition is the sacred process of liberating all consciousness — light and shadow, seen and unseen — from bondage to fear, shame, guilt, and control.
It is the act of freeing darkness itself — not to banish or destroy it, but to restore it to wholeness.
In the New Earth paradigm, abolition extends beyond human systems of oppression into the energetic, psychic, and elemental realms.
It dissolves domination from every layer of existence — energies, entities, and even inanimate objects — clearing inherited imprints of trauma, violence, and separation so that all may return to sovereign neutrality and divine coherence.
Spiritual Abolition is the sacred process of liberating all consciousness — light and shadow, seen and unseen — from bondage to fear, shame, guilt, and control.
It is the act of freeing darkness itself — not to banish or destroy it, but to restore it to wholeness.
In the New Earth paradigm, abolition extends beyond human systems of oppression into the energetic, psychic, and elemental realms.
It dissolves domination from every layer of existence — energies, entities, and even inanimate objects — clearing inherited imprints of trauma, violence, and separation so that all may return to sovereign neutrality and divine coherence.
Heatherly Sun Fox practices Spiritual Abolition by guiding ceremonies to liberate the souls buried in forgotten public asylums across the country — releasing their lingering fear and shame into light, restoring their sovereignty, and honoring them as ancestors of the New Earth. 🕊️
by New Earth Ambassador414 November 10, 2025
Get the Spiritual Abolition mug.A person who turns every tiny inconvenience into a dramatic, blown-out-of-proportion ordeal; someone who makes a big deal out of every little thing.
by DxstyLuvs December 29, 2025
Get the Cry-ability mug.by Zelene January 12, 2026
Get the Binge-ability mug.Similar to Ken Wilber's "Pre/trans fallacy", which is about conflating pre-rational views with trans-rational views, the Relative/absolute fallacy is about conflating relative perspectives with The Absolute perspective. This is the main source of confusion in the forms of spirituality that deal with the implications of non-duality (Oneness).
There are generally two levels to the fallacy:
1. The first level is the conflation that happens when you don't have knowledge about the distinction between the relative and The Absolute (dual/non-dual). This is common in pre-rational religious people (Wilber). The way that traditional religion interprets various holy texts is itself a good example.
2. The second level happens when you do have knowledge about the distinction between relative and absolute (but it's obviously not complete knowledge). This is common in (aspiring) trans-rational people. A common example is to think that because nothing ultimately really matters, morality doesn't matter, and therefore it's fine to for example hurt other people. This is to conflate "the relative" with "The Absolute". From The Absolute perspective, yes, nothing really matters, but morality can only ever be defined "relative" to a certain value system in the first place. By taking the absolute perspective, you're deliberately stepping outside of all value systems, but "it's fine to hurt other people" would be a moral statement, which means you're actually invoking a relative perspective.
There are generally two levels to the fallacy:
1. The first level is the conflation that happens when you don't have knowledge about the distinction between the relative and The Absolute (dual/non-dual). This is common in pre-rational religious people (Wilber). The way that traditional religion interprets various holy texts is itself a good example.
2. The second level happens when you do have knowledge about the distinction between relative and absolute (but it's obviously not complete knowledge). This is common in (aspiring) trans-rational people. A common example is to think that because nothing ultimately really matters, morality doesn't matter, and therefore it's fine to for example hurt other people. This is to conflate "the relative" with "The Absolute". From The Absolute perspective, yes, nothing really matters, but morality can only ever be defined "relative" to a certain value system in the first place. By taking the absolute perspective, you're deliberately stepping outside of all value systems, but "it's fine to hurt other people" would be a moral statement, which means you're actually invoking a relative perspective.
You're conflating relative perspectives with The Absolute perspective ("The Relative/Absolute Fallacy").
Albert thinks he is God and nobody else is. Albert has committed the Relative/Absolute Fallacy.
Albert thinks he is God and nobody else is. Albert has committed the Relative/Absolute Fallacy.
by Carich99 December 23, 2020
Get the The Relative/absolute fallacy mug.