Evidence-Based Moralism

A form of moralism where "evidence-based" becomes not a commitment to grounding claims in data but a weapon for dismissing views one dislikes and a badge of personal virtue. The evidence-based moralist treats their own positions as simply "what the evidence shows" and opponents' views as not just wrong but morally suspect—irrational, anti-science, dangerous. Evidence becomes a cudgel rather than a tool, a way of ending conversations rather than advancing them. The moralism lies in using the prestige of "evidence" to launder personal judgments, treating empirical support for one's views as proof of one's virtue, and dismissing those who interpret evidence differently as morally deficient rather than just differently persuaded.

Example: "He didn't argue—he just kept saying his position was 'evidence-based' and hers wasn't, as if that settled everything. Evidence-Based Moralism: using the word 'evidence' to avoid having to provide any."

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal March 14, 2026

Evidence-Based Puritanism

A purity culture within communities that elevate "evidence-based" as the supreme standard of legitimacy, where proper relationship to evidence becomes a test of virtue and belonging. Evidence-based puritanism demands that true members base all claims on approved kinds of evidence (usually quantitative, experimental, published in high-impact journals), treat other forms of knowledge as illegitimate, and maintain the purity of evidentiary standards against contamination by alternative ways of knowing. Members compete to demonstrate their evidentiary rigor, their commitment to "what the evidence shows," their willingness to dismiss anything that doesn't meet their standards. The result is a community that claims to value evidence while being dogmatically closed to the full range of human knowledge, treating "evidence-based" as a club rather than a commitment.

Example: "She cited decades of community experience, and they dismissed it as 'anecdotal'—Evidence-Based Puritanism, where only their kind of evidence counts, and anyone who doesn't have it is simply ignored."

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal March 14, 2026

Evidence-Based Orthodoxy

The established, institutionalized set of beliefs and practices that define mainstream evidence-based approaches—the view that claims should be evaluated by evidence, that certain kinds of evidence (typically quantitative, experimental, peer-reviewed) are privileged, and that evidence-based practice is the gold standard for knowledge in medicine, policy, and beyond. Evidence-based orthodoxy includes core commitments: that randomized controlled trials are the highest form of evidence, that systematic reviews should guide practice, that expert consensus based on evidence should inform policy, and that claims without evidence can be dismissed. Like all orthodoxies, it serves necessary functions: improving practice, reducing error, and providing standards for evaluation. But like all orthodoxies, it can become dogmatic, resisting challenges to its evidentiary hierarchy and marginalizing other ways of knowing. Evidence-based orthodoxy determines what counts as "real" evidence, what methods are legitimate, and who counts as a "true" evidence-based practitioner versus a charlatan or ideologue.

Example: "He suggested that qualitative research and community experience might provide valid evidence alongside RCTs—and was accused of 'abandoning evidence-based practice' by his colleagues. Evidence-based orthodoxy doesn't allow that there might be multiple kinds of evidence; it assumes its own hierarchy is the only legitimate one."

by Abzugal March 16, 2026

Evidence-Based Charlatanism

A deceptive practice where individuals invoke "evidence-based" as a rhetorical shield to legitimize their positions while ignoring, misrepresenting, or selectively applying evidence. The evidence-based charlatan uses the language of empiricism to claim authority, but their engagement with evidence is superficial—citing studies that support their view while ignoring contradictory findings, demanding impossible standards of evidence from opponents, and treating their own preferred evidence as self-evidently correct. They weaponize "evidence-based" to shut down debate, positioning themselves as the rational party and all alternatives as unscientific. The charlatanism lies in using the idea of evidence to avoid the actual work of evidence evaluation, turning a valuable methodological commitment into a performative identity.

Example: "He demanded randomized controlled trials for his opponents' claims while citing blog posts as evidence for his own. Evidence-Based Charlatanism: using the language of rigor to avoid the practice of it."

by Abzugal March 22, 2026

Lemon baseball

A game while you throw an unripe lemon at someone and they are supposed to splatter the lemon all over the backyard with the wooden stick

Let's play lemon baseball

by Townerstowners February 17, 2025

Mr.Based

A person known for exploiting disabled people.

You shouldn't make make money doing that, you are not Mr.Based.

by Dom Bertucci May 31, 2025

Science Based Lifting

Science-based lifting refers to a training approach that emphasizes using scientific principles and research findings to optimize workout routines, nutrition, and recovery.

Gymbro 1 - "Yo bro, you tryna do some keenan flaps?"
Gymbro 2 - " Get this science based lifting snot out of my face"

by sciencebasedlifter June 3, 2025