Works at the post office

A term used to describe somebody who is clearly on drugs and/or schizophrenic

Person 1: Do you see that crazy old geezer on the street
Person 2: He definitely works at the post office

by Wadda 147 July 6, 2023

The D (Dennis R) (post 1.1 patch)

The D is a mystical being who is an accomplice of The J. He used to be called Dennis R, but the community slowly started shifting towards calling him "The D" as the merchandising started to feature the latter name.

The D has received various buffs and debuffs throughout this update. He is no longer as prone to getting debuffed by missfosters or The J. However, his attack stat has become reduced while his defense stat has been increased, making him more of a tanky pick.

The D's number one move, "Neverending Anger", has been greatly buffed in that it now also boosts his defense.

Man, I was almost killed by The D (Dennis R) (post 1.1 patch) yesterday.

broooo..... The D (Dennis R) (post 1.1 patch) is so powerful he opened the door when two people were blocking it.....

I wish I could have my very own The D (Dennis R) (post 1.1 patch)!

by Follower of Dennis R and The J January 16, 2024

Theory of Valid Post-Truth

The systematic elaboration of valid post-truth as a framework for understanding contemporary epistemology. The Theory of Valid Post-Truth argues that we are witnessing not the death of truth but its mutation—a shift from truth-as-correspondence to truth-as-performance, truth-as-identity, truth-as-weapon. It traces the conditions that produced this shift: the collapse of trusted institutions, the rise of social media, the weaponization of information, the fragmentation of publics. It doesn't celebrate this shift or lament it; it seeks to understand it, to map its contours, to navigate its terrain. The Theory of Valid Post-Truth is the attempt to think clearly about a world where truth is no longer what it was.

Example: "He'd been searching for a way to understand the new information landscape—the lies that felt true, the facts that convinced no one. The Theory of Valid Post-Truth gave him language: truth had mutated, shifted from correspondence to performance. He stopped trying to fight the old war and started learning to navigate the new terrain."

by Abzugal February 21, 2026

Critical Theory of Post-1900 History

The application of Critical Theory to history after 1900—examining how recent history is constructed, how it serves contemporary politics, and what's at stake in its telling. Critical Theory of Post-1900 History asks: Who writes the history of the recent past? How do contemporary power relations shape what's remembered and what's forgotten? How are histories of trauma, revolution, and resistance told—and by whom? Drawing on memory studies and critical historiography, it insists that post-1900 history is never just the past—it's the present arguing about itself through stories of what just happened.

"We know what happened, we were there, they say. Critical Theory of Post-1900 History asks: do we? Memory is selective, contested. The same events are remembered differently by victors and victims. Post-1900 history isn't settled; it's fought over. Critical theory insists on asking: whose memory counts, and whose is erased—and what does that tell us about power today?"

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal March 4, 2026

Theory of Valid Post-Truth

A theoretical framework proposing that there are legitimate, non-pathological forms of "post-truth" phenomena—situations where the dominance of narrative over fact reflects not the death of truth but the recognition that truth is always mediated, always interpreted, always embedded in power relations. The theory distinguishes between pathological post-truth (deliberate deception, propaganda, conspiracy theories) and valid post-truth: the acknowledgment that different communities have different truth practices, that official facts often serve official interests, that what counts as "truth" in any society reflects who has power to define it. Valid post-truth doesn't deny reality—it asks whose reality counts, who gets to define the terms, and how truth functions as a social practice rather than just a correspondence to facts. It's post-truth as critique rather than cynicism.

Example: "He wasn't denying climate change—he was asking why indigenous observations counted less than satellite data. The Theory of Valid Post-Truth explains this: not rejection of truth, but critique of whose truth counts."

by Dumu The Void March 14, 2026

Theory of Legit Post-Truth

A companion framework to the Theory of Valid Post-Truth, focusing on the legitimacy of post-truth conditions in specific contexts—particularly where marginalized communities develop their own truth practices in response to exclusion from dominant truth regimes. The theory argues that when official truth-telling institutions have systematically lied to, excluded, or harmed a community, that community's skepticism toward official truth is not pathology but survival—not post-truth as the end of truth, but post-truth as the beginning of alternative truth practices. Legit post-truth describes the epistemic practices of those who have learned that official truth serves official power, and who have developed other ways of knowing in response. It's not the death of truth but the democratization of it.

Example: "The community trusted their own observation over government statistics—not because they were anti-science, but because the government had lied to them for generations. Theory of Legit Post-Truth: skepticism as survival, not cynicism."

by Dumu The Void March 14, 2026

Stick that on your Facebook and post it!

The equivalent to the phrase "stick that in your pipe and smoke it" or "take that to the bank."

I just gave you a huge dose of truth, man. Stick that on your Facebook and post it!

by TheMayorOfEarth January 18, 2016