by harbdog2 September 15, 2021

Created in 2021, the Vaccarella Theorem of Quadrilaterals places an emphasis on the vagueness which can be applied to everyday examples. A rectangle, in terms of quadrilaterals, is a specific parallelogram in which each pair of adjacent sides is perpendicular. On the contrary, squares are regular quadrilaterals that have four equal sides, along with four right angles. Using this information, one can identify that squares have more specific conditions than rectangles. Moreover, all squares are rectangles, but not all rectangles are squares. This means that squares can be viewed as the less vague topic in any situation, due to them being less likely to occur in the world of quadrilaterals. On the other hand, Rectangles can be seen as the more vague topic, due to them requiring less conditions to exist. One could use this when analyzing any given situation. For example, if one was to look at the issue of poverty within the United States, the Vaccarella Theorem of Quadrilaterals could be applied by saying that the general issue of poverty is the rectangle, whereas the issue of homelessness could be seen as the square. The Vaccarella Theorem of Quadrilaterals goes further than just rectangles and squares, and if needed, one can apply even more quadrilaterals to further differentiate parts of a situation, by simply increasing the complexity of quadrilaterals and adding them to the comparison.
"That was a crazy game, too bad the defense played so bad. I was just thinking about the Vaccarella Theorem of Quadrilaterals. The whole team was pretty bad today actually, it's like the team as a whole was the rectangle, but that one turnover in the fourth quarter was definitely the square."
by Beetlejesus November 9, 2021

Accepting what you have under the guise of "everything else sucks". Truthfully, you gave up wanting what you dont have.
You hate potatoes, you could have carrots but its late and youre sleepy - carrots are probably hard to chew so you just eat the potatoes, this is mom's dinner theorem
-
A: i dont know, i guess i like being a girl! I mean, being a dude peobably sucked just by standardization alone.
B: mom's dinner theorem?
A: id rather not think about it.
-
A: i dont know, i guess i like being a girl! I mean, being a dude peobably sucked just by standardization alone.
B: mom's dinner theorem?
A: id rather not think about it.
by Anoneeneemus December 17, 2024

The Akehoshi Subaru Theorem states when one feels the whims of gacha due to an underlying feeling of fondness for said character (not including applications regarding “meta” reasons) one may utilize that in priority of gacha decision.
“man i really want to get childe because i like him but i dont think he’ll fit into any of my teams”
“nah man the akehoshi subaru theorem says you should get him if you like him”
“nah man the akehoshi subaru theorem says you should get him if you like him”
by boopsae October 11, 2023

Paslay’s Theorem states that the length of the penis is more accurately described by the ratio between weight, height and penis length. Paslay’s Theorem is known to describe the phenomenon of short and skinny men seeming to have large penises regardless of length.
by Signumsixty April 3, 2022

A: Did you hear? The Patriots came back from a 25 point deficit to win the Superbowl!
B: Wow, that's like stuff from the Infinite Monkey Theorem.
B: Wow, that's like stuff from the Infinite Monkey Theorem.
by Azshara October 7, 2020

Simply stated; in the public forum, delivery style outperforms content integrity as a potentiator of true communication. In the world of debate, well composed and articulated bullshit, especially when delivered extemporaneously, can stand toe-to-toe with poorly communicated: absolute truth, brilliant insight, inspired wisdom, or even genius-level analysis any day of the week.
Although candidate A clearly has a superior command of the subject matter, they tend to get nervous, and stutter and stammer, and seem to grasp for the right word, while candidate B who is well known for his silky sooth speaking style, broadcast-quality voice, and skill in weaving Improvisational comedy into his responses, once again, Vaughan’s Theorem accurately predicts that B will appear to win the question in spite of demonstrated cluelessness regarding the question that was posed.
by Kenneth A. Vaughan August 18, 2020
