Cambridge International Education IGCSE First Language English exams always tend to have something in common. There will always be an 'implicit meaning' point of something attempting to be funny but the students never find it amusing, which is why they usually lose points in those points. This conundrum is usually referred to as the 'Ocean King Theorem' due to it being always referenced to a past exam that had a man supposed to be funny known as the Ocean King.
That exam we just did had an Ocean King Theorem ass joke. Whoever wrote this test needs better humor, I never knew a Bengal tiger was meant to be funny.
by marcelorhvp May 10, 2024
Get the Ocean King Theoremmug. The Akehoshi Subaru Theorem states when one feels the whims of gacha due to an underlying feeling of fondness for said character (not including applications regarding “meta” reasons) one may utilize that in priority of gacha decision.
“man i really want to get childe because i like him but i dont think he’ll fit into any of my teams”
“nah man the akehoshi subaru theorem says you should get him if you like him”
“nah man the akehoshi subaru theorem says you should get him if you like him”
by boopsae October 11, 2023
Get the Akehoshi Subaru Theoremmug. The Jordan curve theorem states that a non-self intersecting continuous loop in the plane(i.e. a Jordan Curve) divides the plane into an interior and exterior region.
To prove the theorem, we shall us proof by fucking obviousness. It's a closed loop, of course there's going to be an outside and inside. Humans have been making borders and fences for millenia and this still needs to be proven?? What am I supposed to say? It's so bloody obvious!
It's like trying to prove 1+1=2. Why the fuck is this even a theorem? Not even worth to be a Lemma or Corollary tbh. This trivial ass bitch.
To prove the theorem, we shall us proof by fucking obviousness. It's a closed loop, of course there's going to be an outside and inside. Humans have been making borders and fences for millenia and this still needs to be proven?? What am I supposed to say? It's so bloody obvious!
It's like trying to prove 1+1=2. Why the fuck is this even a theorem? Not even worth to be a Lemma or Corollary tbh. This trivial ass bitch.
"Yo man, you heard of Jordan Curve Theorem? How do I prove it for our upcoming exam", asked John, he was found dead, cut in 25 pieces, by the police after 4 days.
by geno singh March 12, 2024
Get the Jordan Curve Theoremmug. “There is an inverse relationship between how much you care about the body of your car and how well you treat other people”
Man: Wow that Steve sure does take good care of his 1992 Mustang.
Other man: Yeah but he won’t let anyone touch it and everyone thinks he’s a dick. Classic example of Steve’s Theorem.
Other man: Yeah but he won’t let anyone touch it and everyone thinks he’s a dick. Classic example of Steve’s Theorem.
by the notorious swish May 22, 2020
Get the Steve’s Theoremmug. When you are doing Pythagoras theorem in maths class but get very horny because of the way that hypotenuse looks at you in the corner of your eye.
You think you're just going crazy but then you realise it's calling out to you.
Screw the A squared and B squared, look at that sexy C squared.
And it only gets better when you find the square root of that. A lonely little C waiting for you just outside the door...
You strip naked and get ready to pound the living shit out of that hypotenuse.
You think you're just going crazy but then you realise it's calling out to you.
Screw the A squared and B squared, look at that sexy C squared.
And it only gets better when you find the square root of that. A lonely little C waiting for you just outside the door...
You strip naked and get ready to pound the living shit out of that hypotenuse.
by SkibidiDonkeyMan May 21, 2024
Get the pygyattoras theoremmug. Simply stated; in the public forum, delivery style outperforms content integrity as a potentiator of true communication. In the world of debate, well composed and articulated bullshit, especially when delivered extemporaneously, can stand toe-to-toe with poorly communicated: absolute truth, brilliant insight, inspired wisdom, or even genius-level analysis any day of the week.
Although candidate A clearly has a superior command of the subject matter, they tend to get nervous, and stutter and stammer, and seem to grasp for the right word, while candidate B who is well known for his silky sooth speaking style, broadcast-quality voice, and skill in weaving Improvisational comedy into his responses, once again, Vaughan’s Theorem accurately predicts that B will appear to win the question in spite of demonstrated cluelessness regarding the question that was posed.
by Kenneth A. Vaughan August 18, 2020
Get the Vaughan’s Theoremmug. Lodge's Incompleteness Theorem questions whether a slice of quiche a toast or a taco under the Cube Rule of Food Identification.
by kingwotzit July 19, 2023
Get the Lodge's Incompleteness Theoremmug.