Summary: AI will specifically destroy jobs created by computers in the first place, preserving 'offline' jobs, while minimally impacting work quality, and preserving gross productivity.
1) The jobs that AI destroys will largely be isolated to many of the same jobs the computers created, facilitated or enabled, 2) The more that workers in a given field were reliant upon computers, the lower the percentage of them will be required to accomplish the same output after AI is deployed; this reduction in demand for workers could be up to 90% in some market segments. 3) When this happens, work quality only suffers slightly; 4) When this happens, productivity is not reduced, and some companies may scale-up fewer workers to surpass previous productivity levels.
The take-away is that jobs that were largely or entirely not dependent on computers (or which predate computer) will be less impacted by the rollout of ML and AI. These jobs include carpenters, police, paramedics, doctors, refuse workers, power linesmen.
This will remain true until corporations push culture if not laws to have androids perform those remaining jobs left to humans (e.g. carpenters, police, paramedics, doctors, refuse workers, power linesmen). At that point, society will debate whether productivity is more important that anthropocentrism and protecting a moralized, industrious, human populations.
Put forth by Zackery West, marketer, in 2024.
reworded and resubmitted
1) The jobs that AI destroys will largely be isolated to many of the same jobs the computers created, facilitated or enabled, 2) The more that workers in a given field were reliant upon computers, the lower the percentage of them will be required to accomplish the same output after AI is deployed; this reduction in demand for workers could be up to 90% in some market segments. 3) When this happens, work quality only suffers slightly; 4) When this happens, productivity is not reduced, and some companies may scale-up fewer workers to surpass previous productivity levels.
The take-away is that jobs that were largely or entirely not dependent on computers (or which predate computer) will be less impacted by the rollout of ML and AI. These jobs include carpenters, police, paramedics, doctors, refuse workers, power linesmen.
This will remain true until corporations push culture if not laws to have androids perform those remaining jobs left to humans (e.g. carpenters, police, paramedics, doctors, refuse workers, power linesmen). At that point, society will debate whether productivity is more important that anthropocentrism and protecting a moralized, industrious, human populations.
Put forth by Zackery West, marketer, in 2024.
reworded and resubmitted
"I'm a USPS door delivery mailman, so, according to West's Theory Of Specific Economic Destruction, my job delivering mail should be fine even if the Postal Service grows more efficient at correctly routing addresses and scheduling delivery drivers."
by Zack West February 18, 2024
The Nancy Carballo Theory "Nancy Theory" states that if a women (typically of the heterosexual subclass) has no redeeming qualities of any sort, and still attracts people of the opposite sex, indeed has to be good at giving oral sex (throat goat)
by kanyelover69 December 14, 2022
When you fade the Sharps in betting. Bob believes they are trying to control the line by making it seem like they’re betting one way, but they actually bet the other once the line moves enough.
Chris: sharps love the over in the Temple game.
Bob: I’m hammering the under then.
Chris: that’s Bob’s Theory for ya.
Bob: I’m hammering the under then.
Chris: that’s Bob’s Theory for ya.
by BobsTheory January 14, 2021
Person 1: “oh look at this girl, Arden”
Person 2: “her name is Arden? She looks more like a Caitlyn to me…”
Person 1: “totally.”
Person 2: “see? Arden Theory.”
Person 2: “her name is Arden? She looks more like a Caitlyn to me…”
Person 1: “totally.”
Person 2: “see? Arden Theory.”
by Shrek5ever April 08, 2024
The speed at which the particles dance on the dance floor and how many successful dance partners you can get in period of time
by Ooefs February 20, 2023
Likely a strawman created by the far right to make racial/ethnic egalitarians look like silly, naive magic believers.
Guessing that this theory states that people's behavior are determined by the location they're in through "magic". Pretty much no one actually believes that people will change behavior once they enter an area. The far right can't actually "prove" their "superiority" so they have to compare themselves to made up magic believers even stupider than them to give them a false sense of intelligence. If you see someone use this term against you, that's a sign that they're just a troll who just want to make you mad.
Guessing that this theory states that people's behavior are determined by the location they're in through "magic". Pretty much no one actually believes that people will change behavior once they enter an area. The far right can't actually "prove" their "superiority" so they have to compare themselves to made up magic believers even stupider than them to give them a false sense of intelligence. If you see someone use this term against you, that's a sign that they're just a troll who just want to make you mad.
A: "Different races and ethnicities are still part of the same species. Any non appearance or cultural based differences are too small to count any race or ethnicity as actually better than others."
B: "ANOTHER BELIEVER IN MAGIC DIRT THEORY AND ANOTHER LIBTARD EPICLY PWNED!!!"
A: "'Magic Dirt Theory'? The hell's that? Some strawman you created?"
B: "HOW ARE YOU SO DUMB AS TO NOT KNOW THE THEORY YOU BELIEVE IN? CAN'T EXPECT SHIT FOR A LIBTARD EMPHASIS ON THE L AND THE TARD"
A: "Another day another troll"
B: "ANOTHER BELIEVER IN MAGIC DIRT THEORY AND ANOTHER LIBTARD EPICLY PWNED!!!"
A: "'Magic Dirt Theory'? The hell's that? Some strawman you created?"
B: "HOW ARE YOU SO DUMB AS TO NOT KNOW THE THEORY YOU BELIEVE IN? CAN'T EXPECT SHIT FOR A LIBTARD EMPHASIS ON THE L AND THE TARD"
A: "Another day another troll"
by Silicosis9324 July 19, 2024
the Phonetic Temperature Theory is a theory that states that as average temperature of a native speaker's location decreases over a long span of time, the verb-consonant ratio of the native speaker's words decreases, and that speech quickens and hardens in colder temperature. Secondly, This theory also states the vice versa; as average temperature of a native speaker's location increases over a long span of time, the verb-consonant ratio of the native speaker's words increases, and that speech slows and smooth-ens in warmer temperature. Thirdly, this theory also states that pronunciation changes quicker when the average temperature of a native speaker's location changes quicker, and that pronunciation changes slower when the average temperature of a native speaker's location changes slower.
Person 1: How can I predict when the pronunciation of a word will change?
Person 2: with Phonetic Temperature Theory, we can do this by 1. knowing how long the current pronunciation has existed for, 2. knowing the differences in local average temperature at the beginning of pronunciation usage to now, 3. knowing previous pronunciation of the preceding form of the word, and using IPA slope to predict future pronunciation and use multiplication (local average temperature now - local average temperature at the beginning of pronunciation usage)/(time between beginning of pronunciation usage and now), if the value is positive (meaning the local temperature got warmer) then shift clockwise on the IPA chart (k -> g), this is the reasoning for why Latin "catta" became "gato" because the Spanish/Portuguese climates are slightly warmer than the Ancient Roman climate.
Person 2: with Phonetic Temperature Theory, we can do this by 1. knowing how long the current pronunciation has existed for, 2. knowing the differences in local average temperature at the beginning of pronunciation usage to now, 3. knowing previous pronunciation of the preceding form of the word, and using IPA slope to predict future pronunciation and use multiplication (local average temperature now - local average temperature at the beginning of pronunciation usage)/(time between beginning of pronunciation usage and now), if the value is positive (meaning the local temperature got warmer) then shift clockwise on the IPA chart (k -> g), this is the reasoning for why Latin "catta" became "gato" because the Spanish/Portuguese climates are slightly warmer than the Ancient Roman climate.
by hgjfsklvmjfghbugdsfkc November 27, 2023