Atheist Discrimination

The concrete, harmful application of atheist bigotry in social, professional, or institutional settings. It includes refusing to hire someone because of their spiritual beliefs, excluding them from community spaces, blocking them from professional networks, or orchestrating online harassment campaigns against them. Unlike mere prejudice, discrimination involves actions that limit opportunities, damage reputations, or cause tangible harm. Atheist discrimination often hides behind “merit” or “scientific integrity,” but its effects are indistinguishable from other forms of religious persecution.

Example: “She was denied membership in the skeptic society after she revealed her indigenous spiritual practices—atheist discrimination, using the label ‘unscientific’ to enforce a narrow worldview.”

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal March 25, 2026

Proof Discrimination

The concrete, harmful application of Proof Bigotry in social, professional, or institutional settings. It occurs when individuals or groups are excluded, penalized, or discredited because their beliefs, practices, or identities cannot be “proven” according to standards set by those in power. Proof discrimination can look like denying religious accommodation because belief in God cannot be empirically demonstrated, dismissing indigenous land claims because they are based on oral tradition rather than written deeds, or refusing to hire someone whose spiritual practice is deemed “unscientific.” It uses the rhetoric of evidence to justify what is essentially persecution.

Example: “The university denied her request for a meditation space, citing ‘lack of evidence that meditation has measurable benefits’—proof discrimination, using evidentiary standards to deny religious accommodation.”

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal March 25, 2026

Evidence Discrimination

The institutional and interpersonal application of Evidence Prejudice, where individuals or groups are denied opportunities, accommodations, or respect because their knowledge systems do not produce evidence in the form demanded by dominant institutions. Evidence discrimination can be seen in academia, where oral traditions are excluded from “scholarly” status; in medicine, where traditional healing is dismissed as “unproven” despite generations of observed efficacy; and in law, where cultural practices are disallowed because they cannot be documented in Western formats. It uses “evidence” as a gatekeeping mechanism to preserve epistemic hierarchy.

Example: “The court refused to consider Indigenous oral histories as evidence of land stewardship, demanding written deeds instead—evidence discrimination, imposing one culture’s evidentiary rules to erase another’s history.”

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal March 25, 2026

Scientific discrimination

Scientific discrimination, also referred to as evidence-based discrimination, scientific intolerance, scientific bigotry, evidence-based bigotry, scientific prejudice, evidence-based violence, and/or evidence-based violence, currently refers to a practice in online scientific communities, groups, and niches that consists of the selective use of science and evidence to justify discrimination, intolerance, prejudice, and violence against dissidents, people and groups with whom they disagree, or simply people who think differently or whose practices are deemed "unscientific," "relativistic," "postmodernist," "pseudoscientific," "parascientific," and the like. It is a fairly common practice in science communication groups and communities, and in places like popular social media platforms and YouTube video comments.

Previously, scientific discrimination was used to refer to scientific racism and discrimination against groups (women, minorities) within science itself, but today it is accepted as consensus that scientific discrimination also refers to the selective use of science and scientific evidence to justify discrimination, intolerance, prejudice, and related violence against dissident groups or groups with which those concerned disagree, such as religious people, spiritual people, people with spiritual experiences, theists, neurodivergent people, autistic people, political dissidents in Western countries, political dissidents in liberal democracies, and the like, as well as systemic violence against dissident practices such as psychoanalysis, Jungian psychology, transpersonal psychology, humanistic psychology, holistic therapy, Marxism, socialism, communism, linguistic relativism, neuropsychorelativism, epistemological relativism, scientific relativism, critical theory, decolonial theory, queer theory, Voidpunk theory, Voidborne/Voidling theory, leftist theories, dynamic systems, complex systems, chaotic systems, and the like. In addition to using terms such as "relativist," "postmodernist," "denialist," "obscurantist," "delusional," "schizophrenic," "psychotic," "nonsense," "psychononsense," "charlatan," "pseudoscience," "pseudo-shaming," and the like to silence criticism and dissenting thought, even when they have sources and evidence to support them.

by AbzuInExile January 24, 2026

Religions That Discriminate

Islam is the most misunderstood religion - Christians, Jews, Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists and more will burn in hell. They always blame the Muslims and when a Muslim hurts a fly they get sentenced to death and when one your dirty white boys kills someone they help cover up their tracks. Admit it, you're dicks who discriminate.

Christian: That terrorist was a Muslim.
Jew: They totally ripped off of our religion.
Muslim: Stop discriminating.
Every Other Religion (Religions That Discriminate): HE SPOKE!!!!!!! ARREST HIM!!!!!!!!!!!!

by ExceptionalGamer June 8, 2018

Trickle down discrimination

What happens when parents, not considerate of the fact that kids will be mean to other kids, say racist or otherwise discriminatory jokes and stereotypes between them or directly to kids, transferring the mindset to their children and feeding their bullying. Generally followed by the minority kids getting bullied for being different from the group, and so feeling increasingly apart, sometimes even turning to radicalism in response.

Trickle down discrimination typical case :

6 year old Kid : Hey dad there is another boy in my class who speaks French, isn't that cool!?
Dad: Oh I see! Haha you know, we call them frogs because they eat frog legs.

6 year old kid next day : Hey Frog! BAHAHAHA do you really eat frog legs?
French kid : ew no!
Other kids : Hahaha you do Frog!

by Itsinstrumentalmate March 25, 2021

Chub on Chub discrimination

Chub on chub discrimination is when a chubby person discriminates another chubby person for being chubby

Did you hear kevin make fun betty for being fat when he fat

That's chub on Chub discrimination

by Kid with dreamss October 18, 2021