Skip to main content

UTMV (Generation 2) Part 2

Further on, Jerry has been banned from discord due to not having the age to be in it according to his country laws, and Ejm shadow has replaced his charge temporarily, the game got brand new admins in training, such as Nicholas, Astric, Medh, and a few more. At the start everything was fine with them, but further on, some other admins from the first generation started getting **way** more strict within the rules. We could not say a single word and that would be warn worthy. And the new admins (excluding Medh) would just give you nonsense excuses in order to keep someone banned, or not do their work properly. Most likely the staff was power thirsty, and would get offended/mad over inoffensive jokes, such as "ok and" + "your mom", which even leaded to the delition of an emoji in particular which would most likely go along with both of those sentences regularly. And this is where the community was not the same anymore, with people getting banned over jokes, warned because of images that were not even considered memes in general, and overall stuff that were not bad enough in order to give the user a punishment. But, after some time, JerryCookies decided to make a brand new recreation of Utmv, called Utpr (standing for Undertale - Paralel Realities.), which would be ran by Jerry' himself, but we've met a "terrible fate".

Continue in UTMV (Generation 3)
Person 3: Ah, UTMV miss the memories...
Person 4: It's the past now, everything good comes to an end. Let's go back inside it's about to rain.
UTMV (Generation 2) Part 2
by Kobby Robert Sheldon August 21, 2022
mugGet the UTMV (Generation 2) Part 2 mug.

.2.amoil.2.

.2.amoil.2.
.2.amoil.2.
mugGet the .2.amoil.2. mug.

2+2=4

How do you know it's not a false thing you believe that helps you survive? Jesus christ Alex the second I called you out as a plant you HARD SPIRALED into the Jordan Peterson nonsense tower. You're spiraling HARD right now?
Hym "Because if you have 2 to apples in a bucket and you place 2 more apples into that same bucket... You not have IIII 👈 this many. You can change the term you use to represent IIII 👈 This many. You can call 'that many' 4 or four or IV or, shit, you can even call it 5! That being said, there COULD VERY WELL BE some kind of hidden mathematical principle that affects 2+2=4 in some significant way. But, it's just low hanging fruit at this point. That's year 1 stuff. We're past all that."
by Hym Iam May 23, 2024
mugGet the 2+2=4 mug.

2/2 ng but what can i say

2/2ng but what can I say
by confused9999 December 1, 2019
mugGet the 2/2 ng but what can i say mug.

2+2=4 does not=2+2=4

Inter-subjectively

Hym "I really don't think that's the issue. I think when I say 'God is Evil' you hear 2+2=5. So, 2+2=4 does not=2+2=4. Unless... Do you think whether or not God is good is subjective? Either subjective or objective. If it's objective, it's either objectively good or it's objectively evil. If so, which is it? O'Connor let's it. And that's the problem with the online discourse. You're allowed to say 2+2=5 all you want but you aren't allowed to BE Nick Fuentes or 👉 Let me ask you this: How is what Nick Fuentes believes any different from someone who believes in Sharia law? He's a theocract. So he believes the state should be controlled by the religion (which is what Shraria). Whay else? The women have a role? Anti-Lgbt? Your protestations about him (and me) being in public entirely validates their 'Islamophobia.' The can just transpose his beliefs onto the believes of the Muslims and say 'This guy believes what they believe and even THEY don't want them here!'
And you give them an excuse to be dismissive and ignore you on the topic. Which is what they're doing. And you can probably broaden that and say they can transpose THAT onto the the Palestinians and THAT justifies them being dismissive about the protests! And THAT is where the 'If those protesters when to Gaza... (They would get thrown off a roof for being gay or something being the insinuation)' rhetoric comes from. All justified by you without you realizing it. That's why they use the plants. That's the point of doing it. They set you up to approve of 'Islamophobia' by boosting a guy with a Quasi-Sharia interpretation of the religion. they watch you justify excising him from society, you say 'It's not the religion it's the fundamentalism', and then they can internalize that and say 'The fundamentalism is why I'm doing this!' I mean, you're like God's bipolar girlfriend. 'StoOoOop! You're hurting him!' But the bombs keep falling. They'll ignore you and just keep doing whatever they're doing all justified by your own manufactured consent. It's the conservative rhetoric not dismissive? But I digress... The idea that 2+2=4 does not=2+2=4 (inter-subjectively) speaks to a broader point about how people justify behavior or decision and what people accept as true. I could even go further and say it speaks to how people justify 'Evil.' But I'll have to get into that later."
by Hym Iam May 31, 2024
mugGet the 2+2=4 does not=2+2=4 mug.

2+2

2+2 = 4

4 - 1 = 3

quick maths
2+2 the godly equation
by Lagostarwarskid_21 November 7, 2022
mugGet the 2+2 mug.

2+2 before

I bet you came from that one Tik Tok eh?
2+2 before”- Little Johnny
by anonymous November 23, 2020
mugGet the 2+2 before mug.

Share this definition

Sign in to vote

We'll email you a link to sign in instantly.

Or

Check your email

We sent a link to

Open your email