Logical System of Unlimited Truth

A logical framework that posits no limits on truth—truth is infinite, unbounded, encompassing all possibilities, all perspectives, all realities. In an unlimited truth system, every claim is true somewhere, in some dimension, from some perspective; the universe of truth is infinitely large and infinitely various. This system is the logic of the multiverse, of infinite possibility, of the recognition that your truth, however valid, is just one among infinite truths. Unlimited truth systems are exhilarating (anything is true somewhere) and paralyzing (how do you navigate infinite truth?). They're the logic of mystics and quantum physicists, who both know that reality is stranger than we can imagine.

Logical System of Unlimited Truth Example: "He contemplated the logical system of unlimited truth after a psychedelic experience, realizing that his ordinary truth was just one slice of an infinite cake. Every belief he'd ever held was true somewhere, in some dimension, from some perspective. He was simultaneously right and wrong, depending on where you stood. The realization was liberating and disorienting. He returned to ordinary life knowing that his truth was partial, which is the only honest thing to know."

by Abzugal February 17, 2026

Unlimited Logic System

A logical framework with no boundaries, no limits, no constraints—where any inference is permissible as long as it doesn't violate the internal coherence of the system. An unlimited logic system can incorporate any rule, any axiom, any mode of reasoning; it's the logic of pure possibility, of infinite flexibility. Unlimited logic systems are useful for exploring conceptual space, for imagining alternatives, for thinking outside boxes. They're useless for practical decision-making, which requires boundaries, constraints, choices. Unlimited logic is the logic of dreamers, artists, and visionaries—those who need to imagine everything before choosing something.

Unlimited Logic System Example: "She used an unlimited logic system in her creative work, allowing any connection, any inference, any possibility. In this space, anything could be true, anything could follow, anything could happen. The ideas that emerged were wild, original, impossible. Then she had to choose which to realize, which required switching to a bounded system. Unlimited logic for dreaming; bounded logic for doing."

by Abzugal February 17, 2026

Limited Truth Logic System

A logical framework that acknowledges boundaries on truth—not everything is true, not all perspectives are equally valid, some claims are simply false. In a limited truth system, truth operates within constraints: empirical evidence, logical consistency, practical consequences. This system is the logic of everyday life, of science, of any domain where decisions must be made and actions taken. Limited truth systems provide the boundaries necessary for choice, action, and responsibility. They're less exciting than unlimited systems but more useful—they actually help you navigate the world.

Limited Truth Logic System Example: "He applied a limited truth logic system to his business decisions, acknowledging that not all options were equally viable, not all perspectives equally valid, not all claims equally true. The limits were frustrating—he couldn't do everything, couldn't believe everything—but they made choice possible. Within the limits, he found freedom. Unlimited truth would have paralyzed him."

by Abzugal February 17, 2026

Limited Logic System

A logical framework with clear boundaries—defined axioms, fixed rules, constrained possibilities—that operates within those boundaries to produce valid inferences and reliable conclusions. Limited logic systems are what we actually use most of the time: classical logic in mathematics, legal reasoning in courts, scientific method in labs. They're powerful precisely because they're limited—the boundaries create the clarity that makes reasoning possible. Limited logic systems are the workhorses of thought, reliable and productive. They're also incomplete—they can't handle everything, don't claim to. That's what makes them useful.

Limited Logic System Example: "Her legal training was a limited logic system—clear rules, defined precedents, constrained interpretations. Within those limits, she could reason with precision and power. Outside them, she was as lost as anyone. The limits weren't failures; they were the source of her expertise. Limited logic made her effective in her domain and humble about its boundaries."

by Abzugal February 17, 2026

Perfect Logic Fallacy

The mistaken belief that arguments must be logically perfect to be valid—that any logical flaw, no matter how minor or irrelevant, invalidates the entire conclusion. This fallacy ignores that most real-world arguments are not formally perfect, yet still convey truth, persuade audiences, and guide action. The perfect logic fallacy is beloved of internet pedants who delight in pointing out irrelevant formal errors while ignoring the substantive point. It's the logic of "you committed a fallacy, therefore you're wrong," which confuses form with content. The cure is recognizing that logic is a tool, not a tyrant—useful for clarifying thought, not for dismissing it.

Perfect Logic Fallacy Example: "She made an argument about economic inequality. He pounced on a minor logical slip—irrelevant to her main point—and declared her entire argument invalid. The perfect logic fallacy had done its work: avoiding substance by seizing on form. She stopped engaging, which was probably what he wanted."

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 17, 2026

Logical Stalling Tactic

The use of logical demands—requests for definitions, demands for evidence, requests for clarification—not to advance understanding but to delay, distract, or derail conversation. Logical stalling tactics are what happens when someone asks "define your terms" not because they need definitions but because they want to stop the argument. It's the logic of "what do you mean by 'fair'?" (asked for the tenth time), of "prove that assertion" (after the tenth proof). Logical stalling tactics are beloved of bad-faith arguers who know they can't win but can always delay. The cure is recognizing when stalling is happening and refusing to play—offering definitions once, then moving on; providing evidence once, then demanding engagement.

Example: "Every time she made a point, he demanded a definition, a source, a proof. Not because he needed them—he never engaged with what she provided—but because each demand slowed her down, exhausted her, drained the conversation. Logical stalling tactics had turned dialogue into obstacle course. She eventually stopped trying, which was his goal all along."

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 17, 2026

Fallacy of Exhaustive Logic

The mistaken belief that only exhaustive logical analysis—examining every possible inference, anticipating every objection, proving every step—can establish truth. This fallacy rejects any reasoning that falls short of logical perfection, demanding standards that are impossible to meet and therefore never satisfied. The Fallacy of Exhaustive Logic is beloved of those who want to dismiss arguments without engaging them, who can always find one more logical step that hasn't been explicitly justified. It's the logic of "you haven't considered every possibility, so your conclusion is premature"—a standard that, if applied consistently, would halt all reasoning forever.

Example: "She presented a well-reasoned argument for her proposal. He responded with the Fallacy of Exhaustive Logic: 'But you haven't considered every possible objection. What about X? What about Y? What about Z?' Each was addressed, and he found another. Exhaustive logic was impossible; therefore, her argument was never good enough. The fallacy had done its work: preventing decision through infinite demand."

by Dumu The Void February 18, 2026