A common tool used to roughly measure the attractiveness of a woman through 10 general features.
The most commonly judged features, though varying between individuals, are:
Hair, Nose, Teeth, Lips, Neck/Chin, Chest/Breasts, Stomach, Waist, Hips and Rear/Ass.
For each feature on the list, the woman can score a point. If all the features on the list are good on the woman, then she scores 10.
The most commonly judged features, though varying between individuals, are:
Hair, Nose, Teeth, Lips, Neck/Chin, Chest/Breasts, Stomach, Waist, Hips and Rear/Ass.
For each feature on the list, the woman can score a point. If all the features on the list are good on the woman, then she scores 10.
Dude 1: "Dude, did you see that chick I was with last night?"
Dude 2: "Yeah dude, she was totally a 10 *on the 1-10 Female Attractiveness Scale"
*No-one would say that but I need to include the term in the definition
Dude 2: "Yeah dude, she was totally a 10 *on the 1-10 Female Attractiveness Scale"
*No-one would say that but I need to include the term in the definition
by ThatRussianGuy October 2, 2016
Get the 1-10 Female Attractiveness Scalemug. First-known documented scale by an Eastern Bloc author (Nichita Smochină of Moldavia) created for men and women courting one another to rate flirting and kissing on a scale of 1 to 9 (Communist belief did not allow for a 10). The original scale was published in 1930 by Smochină's in the anthology, Cunoștințe Utile ("Useful Knowledge").
As the story goes, Smochină was in Paris at the time, and met a young woman who simply could not flirt or kiss. When he tried to explain to his friends how poorly this woman communicated and later smooched, there was simply no language for explaining this problem. That night, Smochină created the famous Smochină Smooch Scale in one draft. Many say he was divinely inspired.
The rating for #1 took off and gained quite a bit of fame internationally. In its original form, it was "Ăsta se sărută ca o sardină rece de la Marea Neagră" (This one kisses like a cold sardine from the Black Sea.) By the time is was used in speakeasies in Chicago, it had been notably shortened to "Ca un peşte rece" (Like a cold fish).
As the story goes, Smochină was in Paris at the time, and met a young woman who simply could not flirt or kiss. When he tried to explain to his friends how poorly this woman communicated and later smooched, there was simply no language for explaining this problem. That night, Smochină created the famous Smochină Smooch Scale in one draft. Many say he was divinely inspired.
The rating for #1 took off and gained quite a bit of fame internationally. In its original form, it was "Ăsta se sărută ca o sardină rece de la Marea Neagră" (This one kisses like a cold sardine from the Black Sea.) By the time is was used in speakeasies in Chicago, it had been notably shortened to "Ca un peşte rece" (Like a cold fish).
by TexasJewBoy September 27, 2024
Get the Smochină Smooch Scalemug. by ajain983 April 30, 2021
Get the low-scalemug. by The Brickmeister December 17, 2009
Get the The Murph Scalemug. This is an amended version of the 1-4 scale. This scale removes almost all subjectivity from measuring your attraction to someone. Posts on this site have done their best to set out this scale, but this is the definitive, amended version.
The Basic 1-4 Scale (as already noted by Howie440):
1. I wouldn't and I don't see why anyone would.
2. I wouldn't buy I can see why someone would.
3. I would but I can see why someone wouldn't.
4. I would and I can't see why anyone wouldn't.
A New Addition (the 1-5 scale):
5. I would, I can't see why anyone wouldn't, and I'll be happy if I can just get with them.
Amendments & clarifications:
i) Who can really be considered a 4? - To avoid any subjectivity, keep in mind that: if everyone in the group says they're a 3, they're a 4. This is because if everyone calls them a 3, then everyone would and, therefore they're a 4.
ii) The 5 - More of a theoretical idea than a reality. The 5 is someone whom you would be completely satisfied to get with (make out with) once and never see again. They are so attractive to you that you would happily take the one opportunity and never try to talk to them again.
However - this means that if you do try to talk to, message, or get with them again, they are now by default a 4.
iii) It should also be noted that much like how any 4 must already be an agreed 3, any 5 must already be an agreed 4. This is continuous scale.
The Basic 1-4 Scale (as already noted by Howie440):
1. I wouldn't and I don't see why anyone would.
2. I wouldn't buy I can see why someone would.
3. I would but I can see why someone wouldn't.
4. I would and I can't see why anyone wouldn't.
A New Addition (the 1-5 scale):
5. I would, I can't see why anyone wouldn't, and I'll be happy if I can just get with them.
Amendments & clarifications:
i) Who can really be considered a 4? - To avoid any subjectivity, keep in mind that: if everyone in the group says they're a 3, they're a 4. This is because if everyone calls them a 3, then everyone would and, therefore they're a 4.
ii) The 5 - More of a theoretical idea than a reality. The 5 is someone whom you would be completely satisfied to get with (make out with) once and never see again. They are so attractive to you that you would happily take the one opportunity and never try to talk to them again.
However - this means that if you do try to talk to, message, or get with them again, they are now by default a 4.
iii) It should also be noted that much like how any 4 must already be an agreed 3, any 5 must already be an agreed 4. This is continuous scale.
Me: "Hey, how was the club last night?"
Roommate: "Pretty good, I met someone."
Me: "Nice, good looking?"
Roommate: "I'd say 8/10."
Me: "How am I meant to know what that means, use the 1-5 scale."
Roommate: "Oh like a solid 3."
Me: "Glad to hear it mate."
Roommate: "Pretty good, I met someone."
Me: "Nice, good looking?"
Roommate: "I'd say 8/10."
Me: "How am I meant to know what that means, use the 1-5 scale."
Roommate: "Oh like a solid 3."
Me: "Glad to hear it mate."
by yourwelcome03 February 6, 2022
Get the The 1-5 Scalemug. Forgot rating a person 1 to 10, instead try using the “Cove” scale whenever you are describing how you would rate another person to a friend.
The cove scale is a rating from 1 - 4
1 - I wouldn’t date them and I don’t know why anybody else would.
2 - I wouldn’t date them but I can see why other people would.
3 - I would date them but I can see why other people wouldn’t.
4 - I would date them but I can see why other people would.
The cove scale is a rating from 1 - 4
1 - I wouldn’t date them and I don’t know why anybody else would.
2 - I wouldn’t date them but I can see why other people would.
3 - I would date them but I can see why other people wouldn’t.
4 - I would date them but I can see why other people would.
by YungJezus June 12, 2022
Get the The “Cove” Scalemug. Similar to the dog years to human years scale, there is a scale that coverts the time someone has owned a balloon dog to human years.
The scale is add a zero for every month owned, and that's the age of your balloon dog.
Example scale:
1 month = 10 human years
2 months = 20 human years
3 months = 30 human years
Etc.
There is no difference in the scale between small, medium or large dogs.
The scale is add a zero for every month owned, and that's the age of your balloon dog.
Example scale:
1 month = 10 human years
2 months = 20 human years
3 months = 30 human years
Etc.
There is no difference in the scale between small, medium or large dogs.
Person 1: Aw, your balloon dog is so cute. What's his name and how old is he?
Person 2: Thanks. His name is Mello and he's 1 month old today.
Person 1: Wow. So he would be 10 if we use the balloon dog years scale . Happy birthday mello!
Person 2: Thanks. His name is Mello and he's 1 month old today.
Person 1: Wow. So he would be 10 if we use the balloon dog years scale . Happy birthday mello!
by PointedShrimpp January 29, 2017
Get the Balloon Dog Years scalemug.