Double texting is an absurd new way to turn an entire aspect of social communication into a taboo irrational thing. Generally used by normies that can'
t argue and instead spend times writing fallacious ad hominem arguments, but also an
influencer that knows how to
trick easily influenced people.
In practice, the meaning is vague and ambiguous , leaving the user the choice to use this new "trendy(sic)" term as they please. It generally means either that :
-the opposite interlocutor has sent multiple messages in a row .
-the opposite interlocutor is simulteanously talking with two persons , including the user.
According to the second
definition, if a frequent double text caller also listens to
rap (which tends to be the case in newer generations which
will use this "trendy new term") , it is very plausible that they'll recoil in
fear due to a cognitive dissonance as people point out the rapper they listen to also tends to "double text", if not "octuple text" , and many times in a row .
See also: fallacy , argument , normie and more specifically simian .
E.g:
X and Y are in a
heated argument about a bomb , about which Y barely reveals
anything. Y is the double text caller.
Y: Uh uh, no, well I think this bomb is at least 100 times stronger than 50 kilotons.
Y: 1000* lol i didn'
t notice
Y: one zero didn'
t appear
Here, X does not take action concerning the fact Y "double texted" , simply because they aren'
t interested in this kind of "trendy terms" and would rather get educated.
X: Absolutely wrong. Assuming it is a regular old chemical-
based bomb, you simply can'
t reach such powers above 11t.
X: Mind you, not kt (kiloton), just
t (ton) of
TNT.
Y: uuuuuugh r
u double texting ?
Y: double texter SMH SMH SMH
Y Proceeds to then
spam a half ton of unicode symbols that contain colors, more specifically
yellow faces displaying Y's apparent annoyance for the double text, although it is evident they simply can'
t argue at X's level and are bothered by it.
--
(Note: 11 tons of
TNT of power is referring to the MOAB's blast yield, which is (currently) the highest of any chemical/regular bombs. Nuclear bombs can reach much higher yields measured sometimes in the megatons because they convert mass into energy much more efficiently (Chemical bombs barely convert anything to E in E=MC² , while nuclear fission bombs reach
4% at best (which is still rather efficient compared to , for example, coal plants, which explains how optimal atomic plants are compared to something that barely releases any energy.))
