The proffering that a line can only be discrete, countable (infinite), and therefore straight (convergent) if it has a center.
An anarcho-limitation reflects itself through a point reflection to become its own center (meta-center); thereby creating uncountable space.
An anarcho-limitation reflects itself through a point reflection to become its own center (meta-center); thereby creating uncountable space.
Anarcho-limitism proposes a deep link between discreteness and straightness (convergence) that creates uncountability.
Anarcho-limitism proffers that discreteness and convergence reflect themselves through a point-reflection to create a "self" -center.
Uncountability is--tautologically--space, thus a line's center creates uncountable space.
A line with no center is a wave and heaven contains straight-waves (lines with no centers).
A point reflection forms because a line is trying minimize its area.
Thus convergence is neither a function of direction or space.
Straightness is thus revealed to be an AREA.
Anarcho-limitism proffers that discreteness and convergence reflect themselves through a point-reflection to create a "self" -center.
Uncountability is--tautologically--space, thus a line's center creates uncountable space.
A line with no center is a wave and heaven contains straight-waves (lines with no centers).
A point reflection forms because a line is trying minimize its area.
Thus convergence is neither a function of direction or space.
Straightness is thus revealed to be an AREA.
by metawave August 22, 2019

by metawave October 22, 2020

Paradigm which explains why vision theory exists.
It states that outside of pan-contiguity the surface area of a line is twice the length of that line.
It states that outside of pan-contiguity the surface area of a line is twice the length of that line.
In infra-ontology, vision-motion is green but red sees the viewer.
Infra-ontology portends a signal theory of everything.
Infra-ontology portends a signal theory of everything.
by metawave July 15, 2020

The concept of light or language as the center of the mind.
The idea that ontology is effected from language and points toward the human mind.
Black light.
The idea that ontology is effected from language and points toward the human mind.
Black light.
Emanent nihilism solves the conundrum of deterministicism (arbitrariness) by pointing ontology at rather than away from the mind.
Ontology is effected to emerge from language rather than the mind.
This means that reality-in-the-mind is arbitrary as opposed to language centric; ie. the mind-in-reality emerges before reality-in-the-mind can modulate it with language.
Thus language-centricity is reality; and absolute.
Language-centricity--but not language--is absolute.
Ontology is effected to emerge from language rather than the mind.
This means that reality-in-the-mind is arbitrary as opposed to language centric; ie. the mind-in-reality emerges before reality-in-the-mind can modulate it with language.
Thus language-centricity is reality; and absolute.
Language-centricity--but not language--is absolute.
by metawave September 28, 2019

A meta-theory of the self-imago (self-image) in which the conscious is oriented to be emergent from sentiment.
Meta-idealism of the avant-garde.
Meta-idealism of the avant-garde.
by metawave February 19, 2019

A paradigm in which the lateral surface of a circle becomes smooth by having an uncountable number of corners.
Zeta-nihilism argues that circles in themselves don't have infinite corners; rather they have uncountable (infinity^infinity) corners.
Zeta-nihilism argues that circles in themselves don't have infinite corners; rather they have uncountable (infinity^infinity) corners.
by metawave April 01, 2020

Indeterminacy refers to the problem of the number of points in the universe: specifically the counting of them.
These points are indeterminable through game theory (polynominalism) because game theory has uncountable number of pieces--graphices.
These points are indeterminable through game theory (polynominalism) because game theory has uncountable number of pieces--graphices.
The problem of indeterminacy can be solved by applying the Tarski to Godel which notes that the number of points in the universe is infinite and this problem can only be solved by a human...
The human mind--only--can solve the number of points in the universe because the human mind happens to sum the number of points in its structure to be infinity plus uncountability = infinity. Human mind can treat the adddenum of uncountability as trivial because a non-Tarski-space has the uncountable set in its INTERIOR wall. The sum of game theory elements CANNOT treat the addendum of uncountability as trivial because it is a deterministic line (subject to Tarski rules)...
Indeterminacy cannot be solved by game theory because a paradigm with an uncountable number of parts is irreducibly complex.
The human mind--only--can solve the number of points in the universe because the human mind happens to sum the number of points in its structure to be infinity plus uncountability = infinity. Human mind can treat the adddenum of uncountability as trivial because a non-Tarski-space has the uncountable set in its INTERIOR wall. The sum of game theory elements CANNOT treat the addendum of uncountability as trivial because it is a deterministic line (subject to Tarski rules)...
Indeterminacy cannot be solved by game theory because a paradigm with an uncountable number of parts is irreducibly complex.
by metawave April 27, 2022
