An episode of a TV series in which the plot revolves around a boring or unloved side character. This term comes from a Family Guy episode in which the main character, Peter Griffin breaks the fourth wall and makes a reference to the phenomena by apologetically informing the audience that this was to be another "Meg episode".
Friend 1: Oh great! A new episode of Widgets!
Friend 2: Sorry man, I already downloaded it. It's a another Meg Episode, all about John Doe. Boring.
Culture of origin: lesswrong-adjacent blogging communities
The epistemic status is a short disclaimer at the top of a post that explains how confident the author is in the contents of the post, how much reputation the author is willing to stake on it, what sorts of tests the thesis has passed.
It should give a reader a sense of how seriously they should take the post.
It had "Epistemic Status: Wild off-the-cuff speculation" so I didn't bother to read it. It seemed entertaining, just didn't have time.
He said "Epistemic Status: Would bet at 30:1 odds in favour of the thesis and I probably one of the top 100 theorists in the intersection of the relevant fields" but it still seemed completely insane to me. Heads better roll if/when it turns out to be wrong. Like, I mean it, he should lose all of his social capital. People should stop reading his blog and his eigenkarma should be reset (If he's somehow right though I will be very impressed)
A standard filler episode in many Animes. A beach episode features characters on a spontaneous trip to a beach or pool with little plot progression.
Two characters just died last episode, the main characters were deeply saddened. The next episode features a completely spontaneous trip to a beach or pool; beach episode!
A non-threatening, often public, discourse; designed to identify, explore and possibly modify deeply held personal beliefs through the use of the Socratic method.
Through my exposure to street epistemology, it became evident to me that faith--as a foundation for sustaining religious belief--is unreliable. How could divergently opposing religious systems expect to use faith as a method of conveying revealed Truth, yet come to mutually incompatible conclusions? Answer: they can not.