Someone who thinks the Apollo manned lunar landings were faked in a studio on earth. Despite a mountain range worth of documentation regarding the subject, and the fact that no hoax claims can stand up to even minimal strutiny and that no one in the world's scientific community casts any doubt on the subject, these idiots spew the same long-debunked garbage that has easily been refuted and shown to be bullshit for the past 40 years. Most of these idiots watch a couple of Youtube videos regarding the subject, consider that to be valid "research" and subsequently consider themselves to be experts on the subject. There are 3 types:
1. Your general skeptic. These types fully admit that they don't know much about the subject and are just generally inquisitive. The fact that they're willing to be objective and open-minded only keeps them on the wrong side of the fence for a short time.
2. Haters. These people know damn well their theories are wrong and stupid, but have some other hidden agenda, for example anti-Americanism or resentment for being such a god damned loser and never accomplishing anything with their own lives.
3. The batshit crazy. These people aren't even worth conversing with because their standpoint on the subject has nothing to do with facts. Denying a historical event like the Apollo missions is just a religion to them. You could fly them to the moon, rub their noses in the landing sites and hit them on the head with a moon rock and they'd still call it fake.
1. Your general skeptic. These types fully admit that they don't know much about the subject and are just generally inquisitive. The fact that they're willing to be objective and open-minded only keeps them on the wrong side of the fence for a short time.
2. Haters. These people know damn well their theories are wrong and stupid, but have some other hidden agenda, for example anti-Americanism or resentment for being such a god damned loser and never accomplishing anything with their own lives.
3. The batshit crazy. These people aren't even worth conversing with because their standpoint on the subject has nothing to do with facts. Denying a historical event like the Apollo missions is just a religion to them. You could fly them to the moon, rub their noses in the landing sites and hit them on the head with a moon rock and they'd still call it fake.
Hoaxer: You sheeple need to do your research. Why was the flag waving in the wind?
You: The flag is not "waving in the wind". There's no atmosphere on the moon (negligible, anyway), so an extension rod was mounted on the top of it so the flag wouldn't be limp. Secondly, in all of the Apollo footage, it's only moving when the astronaut is inserting it into the ground and twisting the pole, which makes it swing back and forth like a pendulum. Since there's no atmosphere, there's no air resistance to restrict its movement or give it the "parachute" effect. Mythbusters even demonstrated this. And don't give me that "Mythbusters aren't always right" jargon.....all they did was demonstrate how it would behave in an atmosphere compared to how it would behave in a vacuum. Looking at the Apollo footage, it behaves the way it would in a vacuum, not in an atmosphere like it would on a "soundstage" as hoaxers suggest.
Hoaxer: Whatever shill!
You: The flag is not "waving in the wind". There's no atmosphere on the moon (negligible, anyway), so an extension rod was mounted on the top of it so the flag wouldn't be limp. Secondly, in all of the Apollo footage, it's only moving when the astronaut is inserting it into the ground and twisting the pole, which makes it swing back and forth like a pendulum. Since there's no atmosphere, there's no air resistance to restrict its movement or give it the "parachute" effect. Mythbusters even demonstrated this. And don't give me that "Mythbusters aren't always right" jargon.....all they did was demonstrate how it would behave in an atmosphere compared to how it would behave in a vacuum. Looking at the Apollo footage, it behaves the way it would in a vacuum, not in an atmosphere like it would on a "soundstage" as hoaxers suggest.
Hoaxer: Whatever shill!
by Kenya Fister April 28, 2015
Get the hoaxer mug.Timmy was sure to let Sally know she was a hoager for bitching about ignorant bullshit while he was trying to eat.
by SimonClint April 25, 2017
Get the hoager mug.Related Words
hoaxer
• haxer
• hoaxed
• Haxer_1001
• hoader
• hoager
• Hoaker
• hoaxter
• Hoxer
• Loserus Hoaxterus
by ubeenhoaxed April 11, 2020
Get the hoaxed mug.A usually derogatory phrase from Northern Ireland. Also spelt ‘hoker’. A hoaker is someone who roots around in a place where they shouldn’t be rummaging, e.g. under someone’s bed, in someone’s bag or bins etc.
“Hoakin’ the bins are ye? Ye durtay hanillin ye”.
“What are you hoakin’ for the day?’
“Go and have a hoak for it, hoaker”.
“What are you hoakin’ for the day?’
“Go and have a hoak for it, hoaker”.
by binkieboodle July 8, 2014
Get the Hoaker mug.One who attempts to perpetuate a hoax when there is no one left on the face of the planet who is being fooled.
by Not Fooled April 10, 2004
Get the Loserus Hoaxterus mug.Noun/Informal:
The blending of a hacker & a haxor, which uses their knowledge to solve your technology problems fast, secure and affordable.
The blending of a hacker & a haxor, which uses their knowledge to solve your technology problems fast, secure and affordable.
by Casey Murdock June 26, 2007
Get the haxer mug.by Pooink December 3, 2019
Get the Hoxer mug.