Naturalistic Orthodoxy

The established, institutionalized set of beliefs that define mainstream naturalism—the view that nature is all that exists, that supernatural explanations are illegitimate, and that scientific methods are the only reliable paths to knowledge. Naturalistic orthodoxy includes core commitments: methodological naturalism (science should only invoke natural causes), ontological naturalism (only natural things exist), and epistemological naturalism (scientific knowledge is the only genuine knowledge). Like all orthodoxies, it serves necessary functions: enabling scientific inquiry, ruling out supernatural explanations, and providing a unified worldview. But like all orthodoxies, it can become dogmatic, resisting challenges and marginalizing views that question its assumptions. Naturalistic orthodoxy determines what counts as legitimate inquiry, what explanations are acceptable, and who counts as a "real" intellectual versus a mystic or theologian.

Example: "She suggested that indigenous knowledge systems might offer valid insights that don't fit naturalistic frameworks—and was accused of 'abandoning science' by her colleagues. Naturalistic orthodoxy doesn't allow that there might be other ways of knowing; it assumes its own methods are the only legitimate ones."

by Abzugal March 16, 2026

Philosophy of Naturalistic Orthodoxy

A branch of philosophy that examines the nature, justification, and implications of naturalistic orthodoxy—asking philosophical questions about the foundations of naturalism itself. The philosophy of naturalistic orthodoxy investigates the epistemological status of naturalist commitments: Can naturalism justify itself without circularity? How do we know that nature is all that exists? What counts as evidence for naturalism, and what would count against it? It also examines the limits of naturalism: Can naturalism account for logic, mathematics, meaning, and value? Does naturalism's own claims presuppose something beyond nature? The philosophy of naturalistic orthodoxy is essential for naturalism to be self-aware rather than merely assumed, for naturalists to understand the philosophical foundations of their worldview rather than treating them as self-evident.

Example: "His philosophy of naturalistic orthodoxy work asked whether naturalism can account for its own most fundamental tool—logic. If logic is just a natural phenomenon, why think it's universally valid? Naturalism's confidence in reason may require something naturalism can't provide."

by Abzugal March 16, 2026

Sociology of Naturalistic Orthodoxy

A branch of sociology that examines how naturalistic orthodoxies are socially constructed, maintained, and challenged within academic and intellectual communities. The sociology of naturalistic orthodoxy investigates how naturalism becomes the default worldview through education and training, how it's maintained through institutional mechanisms (funding priorities, publication standards, professional boundaries), how dissenters (intellectuals who appeal to supernatural or non-natural explanations) are marginalized or excluded, and how the orthodoxy responds to challenges from religious thinkers, postmodernists, and other heretics. It also examines naturalism as a boundary marker—distinguishing "serious" scholarship from "faith-based" thinking, "real" knowledge from "mere belief." The sociology of naturalistic orthodoxy reveals that naturalism's dominance isn't just about evidence; it's also about social power, institutional authority, and the natural human tendency to treat one's own worldview as simply "how things are."

Example: "Her sociology of naturalistic orthodoxy research showed how scholars who questioned naturalism were systematically excluded from prestigious journals and conferences—not because their arguments were weak, but because they violated the orthodoxy that defined 'serious' scholarship. The boundary policing was invisible to those who benefited from it."

by Abzugal March 16, 2026