Critical Science

Science that explicitly incorporates critique into its practice—not just doing science, but constantly questioning its own assumptions, methods, and implications. Critical Science asks: who benefits? Who's excluded? What are we not seeing? How might our findings cause harm? It's science that has internalized its social responsibility, that knows knowledge is power and acts accordingly. Not science plus ethics as an afterthought, but science that builds ethical questioning into its very methodology.

"We could build this technology, but Critical Science asks: should we? Who will it harm? Who won't have access? What problems might it create? It's not stopping science—it's doing science with eyes open, knowing that 'can' doesn't imply 'should.'"

by Abzugal February 23, 2026

Critical Science

An approach to science that emphasizes questioning assumptions, examining power relations, and attending to the social and political dimensions of scientific knowledge. Critical Science doesn't reject science; it insists that science be examined critically, that its claims be interrogated, that its institutions be held accountable. It asks: who funds this research? Whose interests does it serve? What assumptions are built into the methods? What alternatives are excluded? Critical Science is science with its eyes open, aware of its own contingency, committed to self-examination. It's the opposite of scientism—science that knows itself, rather than science that thinks it's above examination.

Example: "She practiced Critical Science: always asking who funded the research, what assumptions shaped the questions, whose voices were excluded. She didn't reject science; she demanded that it be accountable. Her colleagues sometimes found her exhausting; she found them naive."

by Abzugal March 9, 2026

Critical Science Communication

An approach to science communication that emphasizes questioning assumptions, examining power relations, and attending to the social and political dimensions of how science is communicated. Critical Science Communication doesn't just transmit scientific findings; it also communicates about the context, limits, and politics of those findings. It asks: who funded this research? What are its limitations? How might it be used? What perspectives are missing? Critical Science Communication is science communication with its eyes open, aware of its own role in shaping public understanding and public policy.

Example: "The journalist practiced Critical Science Communication: she didn't just report findings; she also reported who funded them, what limitations existed, what alternatives were being studied. Her readers were better informed—not just about what was known, but about how it came to be known."

by Abzugal March 9, 2026

Critical Theory of Science

The application of Critical Theory to scientific practice—examining how power, social structures, and historical contexts shape scientific knowledge, how science can serve domination or liberation, and how the ideal of value-free science obscures its own politics. Critical Theory of Science asks: Who funds research? Whose questions get asked? Whose bodies get studied? Who benefits from findings? It doesn't reject science but subjects it to relentless critique, revealing how apparently neutral knowledge serves particular interests. Drawing on Marx, the Frankfurt School, and Science and Technology Studies, Critical Theory of Science insists that understanding science requires understanding the society that produces it—and that science can be otherwise.

"They say science is neutral, just facts. Critical Theory of Science asks: neutral for whom? Funded by whom? Serving whose interests? The questions that get asked, the studies that get funded, the results that get published—all shaped by power. Not to dismiss science, but to understand it. Science can be a tool of liberation, but only if we see the chains first."

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal March 4, 2026

Critical Theory of Science Communication

The application of Critical Theory to how science is communicated to publics—examining who gets to speak for science, whose voices are amplified, and how communication can serve domination or liberation. Critical Theory of Science Communication asks: Who are the experts quoted in media? Whose perspectives are missing? How do science communicators frame issues, and whose interests do those frames serve? Does science communication empower publics or just deliver messages from above? Drawing on science and technology studies, critical pedagogy, and media studies, it insists that science communication is never neutral—it's always political.

"They say 'trust the science' as if science were unanimous. Critical Theory of Science Communication asks: trust which scientists? Funded by whom? Speaking to whom? Science communication often hides disagreement, complexity, uncertainty. Critical theory insists on communication that informs, not just commands—that empowers publics to think, not just obey."

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal March 4, 2026

Critical Theory of Science

The application of critical theory—with its emphasis on power, emancipation, and social transformation—to the institution of science. Critical Theory of Science examines how science is shaped by power relations, how it can serve domination or liberation, how it might be transformed to better serve human flourishing. It draws on Marx, Foucault, Habermas, and others to analyze science not as a pure pursuit of truth but as a social institution with political effects. Critical Theory of Science asks not just "what do we know?" but "whose knowledge counts?" and "how might science be otherwise?"

Example: "He applied Critical Theory of Science to his own field, asking how research agendas were shaped by funding, how questions were limited by assumptions, whose interests were served. His colleagues thought he was being political; he thought he was being honest."

by Abzugal March 9, 2026

Critical Theory of Science Communication

The application of critical theory to science communication—examining how power, ideology, and social relations shape what science gets communicated, how it's framed, and to what ends. Critical Theory of Science Communication asks: whose interests does science communication serve? What assumptions are built into its forms? How might it be transformed to better serve democratic participation and social justice? It draws on critical theory, science studies, and communication theory to analyze and critique existing practices and to imagine alternatives.

Example: "He applied Critical Theory of Science Communication to the pandemic coverage, asking how communication had been shaped by political pressures, corporate interests, and institutional agendas. The coverage wasn't just information; it was politics. Understanding that was essential for knowing what to trust."

by Abzugal March 9, 2026