The 12 Axes of the Progress Spectrum

An ultra-fine-grained model adding dimensions of scale and relationship to human flourishing. Building on the 8 Axes, we add: Axis 9: Shallow-Deep (surface-level change vs. fundamental transformation). Axis 10: Compatible-Incompatible (progress that aligns with human nature vs. progress that requires changing it). Axis 11: Measurable-Unmeasurable (quantifiable gains vs. qualitative improvements). Axis 12: Sustainable-Untenable (can continue vs. contains seeds of its own reversal). These twelve axes generate 4096 progress-types. Democracy is moral, collective, cyclical, relative, intended, reversible, slow, diffuse, deep, compatible (arguably), unmeasurable (in some aspects), sustainable (if maintained). Social media "progress" is material, individual, fast, concentrated, shallow, possibly incompatible with human psychology, measurable (engagement), and increasingly looking untenable.

The 12 Axes of the Progress Spectrum "You want to measure progress? The 12 Axes give you homework. Is it deep or shallow? Compatible with human nature or fighting it? Sustainable or about to collapse? Measurable or beyond numbers? Most of what we call progress fails on at least half these axes. That's not cynicism—that's just paying attention."

by Dumu The Void February 25, 2026

The 16 Axes of the Progress Spectrum

The ultimate model, adding the final dimensions of existential and metaphysical significance. Building on the 12 Axes, we add: Axis 13: Human-Posthuman (progress for humans as we are vs. progress that transforms us into something else). Axis 14: Immanent-Transcendent (progress within history vs. progress toward something beyond it). Axis 15: Cumulative-Transformative (adding to what came before vs. replacing it entirely). Axis 16: Meaningful-Meaningless (progress that matters vs. progress that is empty). These sixteen axes generate 65,536 potential positions—enough to capture every vision of progress, every critique, every hope. The 16 Axes reveal that progress isn't a single direction but a multidimensional space of possibilities. AI progress is material, collective (and individual), fast, concentrated, deep (transforming cognition), possibly incompatible with human nature as we know it, measurable, possibly untenable, posthuman (changing what "human" means), immanent (within history), transformative (replacing previous modes), and profoundly contested on the meaningfulness axis. The 16 Axes don't tell you what progress is—they give you language to ask.

The 16 Axes of the Progress Spectrum "You want to know if we're making progress? First, answer the 16 Axes: material or moral? Individual or collective? Fast or slow? Concentrated or diffuse? Deep or shallow? Compatible with human nature or transforming it? Immanent or transcendent? Meaningful or meaningless? And that's just half the list. Progress isn't a simple story—it's 16 questions, and your answers determine everything. Most people haven't even asked one."

by Dumu The Void February 25, 2026

The 2 Axes of the Epistemology Spectrum

A foundational model for understanding theories of knowledge along two fundamental dimensions. The first axis runs from Rationalism (knowledge through reason, logic, innate ideas—thinking your way to truth) to Empiricism (knowledge through experience, observation, sensory data—seeing your way to truth). The second axis runs from Foundationalism (knowledge built on secure, certain foundations that cannot be doubted) to Coherentism (knowledge as a web of mutually supporting beliefs, with no absolute foundations). These two axes create four epistemological orientations: rationalist-foundationalist (Descartes), empiricist-foundationalist (early logical positivists), rationalist-coherentist (some rationalists who gave up on foundations), empiricist-coherentist (Quine, much of contemporary science). The model reveals that "epistemology" isn't one debate—it's a spectrum of positions on where knowledge comes from and how it's structured.

The 2 Axes of the Epistemology Spectrum "You keep demanding absolute foundations for knowledge. The 2 Axes of the Epistemology Spectrum show you're a foundationalist. But coherentists say: foundations aren't necessary—what matters is how beliefs hang together. You're not more rigorous—you're just on a different axis. Learn the spectrum or stay confused about why everyone won't play your foundation game."

by Dumu The Void February 25, 2026

The 4 Axes of the Epistemology Spectrum

An expanded model adding two crucial dimensions to the basic framework. Axis 1: Rationalism-Empiricism (reason vs. experience). Axis 2: Foundationalism-Coherentism (foundations vs. web). Axis 3: Internalism-Externalism (justification depends on factors inside the knower's mind vs. factors outside it). Axis 4: Individualism-Socialism (knowledge is individual achievement vs. knowledge is social product). These four axes create sixteen epistemological positions. Descartes is rationalist, foundationalist, internalist, individualist. Contemporary science is largely empiricist, coherentist, externalist (trusting methods over mental states), and social (science as community achievement). The 4 Axes reveal that debates about knowledge often talk past each other because they're fighting on different axes entirely.

The 4 Axes of the Epistemology Spectrum "You say knowledge requires certainty. That's foundationalism. I say knowledge is what the scientific community agrees on. That's social coherentism. The 4 Axes show we're not even on the same axes—let alone the same positions. No wonder we can't agree. We're playing different games entirely."

by Dumu The Void February 25, 2026

The 6 Axes of the Epistemology Spectrum

A comprehensive model adding two further dimensions for deeper analysis. Axis 1: Rationalism-Empiricism (reason vs. experience). Axis 2: Foundationalism-Coherentism (foundations vs. web). Axis 3: Internalism-Externalism (inside mind vs. outside factors). Axis 4: Individualism-Socialism (personal vs. communal). Axis 5: A Priori-A Posteriori (knowledge independent of experience vs. dependent on it). Axis 6: Analytic-Synthetic (truth by definition vs. truth by fact). These six axes generate sixty-four epistemological positions. Mathematical knowledge is often considered rationalist, foundationalist (in some accounts), internalist, individualist, a priori, analytic. Historical knowledge is empiricist, coherentist, externalist, social, a posteriori, synthetic. The 6 Axes reveal that different domains of knowledge require different epistemological frameworks—one size doesn't fit all.

The 6 Axes of the Epistemology Spectrum "You keep treating all knowledge like math. The 6 Axes show why that fails: math is a priori, analytic, rationalist. History is a posteriori, synthetic, empiricist. Same epistemology for both? That's like using the same tool for brain surgery and plumbing. Different domains, different axes, different standards."

by Dumu The Void February 25, 2026

The 8 Axes of the Epistemology Spectrum

A detailed model adding dimensions of certainty and scope. Axis 1: Rationalism-Empiricism. Axis 2: Foundationalism-Coherentism. Axis 3: Internalism-Externalism. Axis 4: Individualism-Socialism. Axis 5: A Priori-A Posteriori. Axis 6: Analytic-Synthetic. Axis 7: Certainty-Fallibilism (knowledge requires certainty vs. knowledge can be uncertain but still knowledge). Axis 8: Universal-Particular (knowledge of general laws vs. knowledge of specific facts). These eight axes create 256 epistemological positions, mapping the full complexity of human knowing. Scientific laws aim for universal, fallibilist, a posteriori, synthetic knowledge. Historical events are particular, fallibilist, a posteriori, synthetic. Mathematical truths aim for universal, certain (in some views), a priori, analytic. The 8 Axes demonstrate that epistemology isn't a monolith—it's a multidimensional space where different kinds of knowing occupy different coordinates.

The 8 Axes of the Epistemology Spectrum "You say knowledge requires certainty. That's one position on axis 7. But most scientists are fallibilists—they know their knowledge could be wrong, and they call it knowledge anyway. The 8 Axes show you're not more rigorous—you're just on a different axis. Fallibilism isn't weakness; it's a different epistemology for a different kind of knowing."

by Dumu The Void February 25, 2026

The 12 Axes of the Epistemology Spectrum

An ultra-fine-grained model adding dimensions of access and structure. Building on the 8 Axes, we add: Axis 9: Direct-Indirect (knowledge through direct acquaintance vs. knowledge through description/inference). Axis 10: Explicit-Tacit (knowledge you can state vs. knowledge you can't articulate). Axis 11: Propositional-Procedural (knowing that vs. knowing how). Axis 12: Personal-Impersonal (knowledge that requires personal experience vs. knowledge available to anyone). These twelve axes generate 4096 epistemological positions. Knowing a person involves direct, tacit (partly), procedural (how to be with them), personal knowledge. Knowing physics involves indirect, explicit, propositional, impersonal knowledge. The 12 Axes reveal that epistemology must account for the full range of human knowing—not just the kind that fits in journal articles.

The 12 Axes of the Epistemology Spectrum "You think all knowledge can be written down. The 12 Axes show otherwise: tacit knowledge (how to ride a bike) can't be captured in propositions. Procedural knowledge (knowing how) is different from propositional (knowing that). Personal knowledge (knowing a friend) requires experience you can't transfer. Your narrow epistemology doesn't describe knowledge—it describes one kind of knowledge, and it's not even the most important kind."

by Dumu The Void February 25, 2026