AHA! THERE'S THE
REAL ARGUMENT! So... It's not that you even care whether or not it IS a life... Your need to be the arbiter of life and death is more important that life itself. I think you should be forced to give the
guy the blood. ESPECIALLY if you'
re the one who stabbed him. I THINK if I was a 3rd party in THAT SPECIFIC EXAMPLE I think it would be immoral for me to NOT force you to give the
guy you stabbed your blood.
Hym "And, obviously, there is, like, a gradient of how justifiable it is to force you to give a
guy your blood. YOU stabbing the guy is obviously on the extremely justifiable end whereas arbitrarily forcing you to donote blood would be on the unjustifiable end. Honestly, if it was one of my brothers (or something) I wouldn't even care if you had to
die for me to get that
sweet,
SWEET carcass-juice out of that hot little body of yours. Shit, if I have a favorable option of the guy you stabbed I might even
kill a 4th party to get that shit out of you. I just genuinely think that it's a choice that you need to justify. And I DO think it'
s justifiable... On a gradient..."