Law of Logical Flexibility

The principle that logic is flexible—capable of adapting to different domains, questions, and purposes without losing its rigor. A flexible logic can incorporate new rules, modify old ones, and shift its standards as needed. An inflexible logic is a straightjacket, not a tool. The Law of Logical Flexibility distinguishes between logic as living discipline and logic as dead dogma: real logic flexes; fake logic fractures. Flexibility is not inconsistency; it's the capacity to apply consistent principles across diverse contexts.

Example: "She used different logics for different problems—formal logic for mathematics, informal logic for everyday arguments, legal logic for contracts. The Law of Logical Flexibility meant this was not confusion but competence. Each logic flexed to fit its domain. Her critics called her inconsistent; she called herself adaptive. Flexibility had done its work: matching tool to task."

by Dumu The Void February 19, 2026

Law of Logical Liquidity

The principle that logic is like the liquid state—fluid, adaptive, taking the shape of whatever container it occupies while maintaining its essential nature as valid inference. Logic flows through different domains—mathematics, law, science, everyday life—taking the shape of each while remaining itself. It's not a solid monument but a flowing river, always moving, always changing, always the same in its essence. The Law of Logical Liquidity recognizes that logic's power lies in its fluidity, its ability to adapt without losing identity.

Example: "He watched logic flow through different cultures—Western emphasis on deduction, Eastern tolerance for paradox, Indigenous integration of narrative. The Law of Logical Liquidity explained: logic takes the shape of its container, but it's still logic. Different forms, same essence—the river of reason flowing through many landscapes."

by Dumu The Void February 19, 2026

Law of Plausibility and Possible Probability

A framework for evaluating the plausibility and probability of phenomena that seem supernatural, paranormal, or otherwise beyond ordinary explanation—such as spiritual experiences with gods (dreams, visions, visitations), levitation when no one is watching, or other anomalous events. The law proposes that such phenomena should not be dismissed outright but evaluated along multiple dimensions: internal consistency (does the account make sense on its own terms?), external coherence (does it align with known facts?), source reliability (is the witness credible?), and explanatory power (does it explain what needs explaining?). The law also acknowledges that probability is not static—what seems impossible today may become plausible tomorrow as understanding expands. The Law of Plausibility and Possible Probability doesn't prove such phenomena real; it provides a framework for taking them seriously without requiring belief.

Example: "She'd had vivid dreams of a goddess for years—not hallucinations but experiences, real to her, transformative. Skeptics dismissed them as imagination. The Law of Plausibility and Possible Probability offered another view: internally consistent, externally coherent with her life, source reliable (her own experience), explanatory (it explained her peace). Not proof, but plausibility. She didn't need belief; she needed the space to consider that some things might be real even if unproven."

by Dumu The Void February 19, 2026